Marine Biology

, Volume 152, Issue 1, pp 129–133 | Cite as

Scarred limpets at hydrothermal vents: evidence of predation by deep-sea whelks

Research Article

Abstract

The chaotic physical and chemical environment at deep-sea hydrothermal vents has been associated with an ecosystem with few predators, arguably allowing the habitat to provide refuge for vulnerable species. The dominance of endemic limpets with thin, open-coiled shells at north Pacific vents may support this view. To test their vulnerability to predation, the incidence of healed repair scars, which are argued to reflect non-lethal encounters with predators, were examined on the shells of over 5,800 vent limpets of Lepetodrilus fucensis McLean (1988) that were collected from 13 to 18 August 1996. Three vent fields on the Juan de Fuca Ridge at ca. 2,200 m depth were sampled, two within 70 m of 47°56.87′N 129°05.91′W, and one at 47°57.85′N 129°05.15′W with the conspicuous potential limpet predators, the zoarcid fish Pachycara gymninium Anderson and Peden (1988), the galatheid crab Munidopsis alvisca Williams (1988), and the buccinid snail Buccinum thermophilum Harasewych and Kantor (2002). Limpets from the predator-rich vent were most often scarred, a significant difference created by the high incidence of scars on small (<4 mm long) limpets in this sample. Collected with the limpets were small (median shell diameter 4.4 mm) buccinids. They, rather than the larger, more conspicuous mobile fishes and crabs are argued to be the shell-damaging predator.

Supplementary material

227_2007_669_MOESM1_ESM.doc (24 kb)
Supplementary Information 1. List of all non-meiofaunal taxa collected from the three vent fields, with Field Museum catalogue numbers, and number of individuals (n) for gastropod taxa. (doc 25 kb)

References

  1. Alexander RR, Dietl GP (2003) The fossil record of shell-breaking predation on marine bivalves and gastropods. In: Kelley PH, Kowalewski M, Hansen TA (eds) Predator-prey interactions in the fossil record. Kluwer, New York, pp 141–176Google Scholar
  2. Bates AE, Tunnicliffe V, Lee RW (2005) Role of thermal conditions in habitat selection by hydrothermal vent gastropods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 305:1–15Google Scholar
  3. Cadée GC (1999) Shell damage and shell repair in the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna from King George Island. J Sea Res 41:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadée GC, Walker SE, Flessa KW (1997) Gastropod shell repair in the intertidal of Bahia la Choya (N. Gulf of California). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 136:67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Childress JJ, Fisher CR (1992) The biology of hydrothermal vent animals: physiology, biochemistry, and autotrophic symbioses. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 30:337–441Google Scholar
  6. Cohen DM, Haedrich RL (1983) The fish fauna of the Galapagos thermal vent region. Deep-Sea Res 30:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen DM, Rosenblatt RH, Moser HG (1990) Biology and description of a bythitid fish from deep-sea thermal vents in the tropical eastern Pacific. Deep-Sea Res 37:267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher CR, Childress JJ, Macko SA, Brooks JM (1994) Nutritional interactions in Galapagos Rift hydrothermal vent communities: inferences from stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 103:45–55Google Scholar
  9. Harasewych MG, Kantor YI (2002) Buccinum thermophilum (Gastropoda: Neogastropoda: Buccinidae), a new species from the Endeavour vent field of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. J Moll Stud 68:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson SB, Young CR, Jones WJ, Warén A, Vrijenhoek RC (2006) Migration, isolation, and speciation of hydrothermal vent limpets (Gastropoda; Lepetodrilidae) across the Blanco Transform Fault. Biol Bull 210:140–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kropp RK (1992) Repaired shell damage among soft-bottom mollusks on the continental shelf and upper slope north of Point Conception, California. Veliger 35:36–51Google Scholar
  12. Martell KA, Tunnicliffe V, McDonald IR (2002) Biological features of a buccinid whelk (Gastropoda, Neogastropoda) at the Endeavour vent fields of Juan de Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. J Moll Stud 68:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McLean JH (1988) New archaeogastropod limpets from hydrothermal vents: superfamily Lepetodrilacea I. Systematic descriptions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 319:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mensinck B, Fischer CV, Cadée GC, Fonds M, Ten Hallers-Tjabbes CC (2000) Shell damage and mortality in the common whelk Buccinum undatum, caused by the beam trawl fishery. J Sea Res 43:177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Micheli F, Mullineaux LS, Mills SW, Peterson CH, Fisher CR, Sancho G, Johnson GA, Lenihan HS (2002) Species interactions at deep-sea hydrothermal vents: the role of predation in structuring communities in an extreme environment. Ecol Monogr 73:523–542Google Scholar
  16. Robigou V, Delaney JR, Stakes DS (1993) Large massive sulfide deposits in a newly discovered active hydrothermal system, the High-Rise field, Endeavour segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge. Geophys Res Lett 20:1887–1890Google Scholar
  17. Sancho G, Fisher CR, Mills S, Micheli F, Johnson GA, Lenihan HS, Peterson CH, Mullineaux LS (2005) Selective predation by the zoarcid fish Thermarces cerberus at hydrothermal vents. Deep-Sea Res I 52:837–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schoeninger MJ, DeNiro MJ (1984) Nitrogen and carbon isotopic composition of bone collagen from marine and terrestrial animals. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsurumi M, Tunnicliffe V (2001) Characteristics of a hydrothermal vent assemblage on a volcanically active segment of Juan de Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:530–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tsurumi M, Tunnicliffe V (2003) Tubeworm-associated communities at hydrothermal vents on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. Deep-Sea Res I 50:611–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tunnicliffe V (1991) The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 29:319–407Google Scholar
  22. Turner RD (1985) Notes on mollusks of deep-sea vents and reducing sediments. Am Malacol Bull Spec Ed 1:23–34Google Scholar
  23. Vale FK, Rex MA (1988) Repaired shell damage in deep-sea prosobranch gastropods from the western north Atlantic. Malacologia 28:65–79Google Scholar
  24. Vermeij GJ (1982) Environmental change and the evolutionary history of the Periwinkle (Littorina littorea) in North America. Evolution 36:561–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vermeij GJ (1987) Evolution and escalation: an ecological history of life. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Vermeij GJ, Schindel DE, Zipster E (1981) Predation through geological time: evidence from gastropod shell repair. Science 214:1024–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Voight JR (2000) A review of predators and predation at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Cah Biol Mar 41:155–166Google Scholar
  28. Walker SE, Voight JR (1994) Paleoecologic and taphonomic potential of deepsea gastropods. Palaios 9:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Warén A, Bouchet P (1989) New gastropods from East Pacific Rise hydrothermal vents. Zool Scripta 18:67–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Field Museum of Natural HistoryChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Illinois Mathematics and Science AcademyAuroraUSA
  3. 3.Natural History DivisionNational Museum of IrelandDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations