Ingestion of pico- and nanoplankton by the Mediterranean red coral Corallium rubrum
- 190 Downloads
This study investigates the feeding behaviour of the precious red coral Corallium rubrum on bacterioplankton. The effects of flow rate, prey concentration, and seawater temperature were tested. The results obtained show that C. rubrum was able to prey on both pico- and nanoplankton cells. Flagellates constituted the major bacterioplankton food source in terms of carbon and nitrogen, representing from 43 to 70% of the C and N ingested. Flow speed (2, 6, and 11 cm s−1) had no effect on grazing rates, maybe due to the small size of the ingested particles. Conversely, feeding rates increased with prey concentration and seawater temperature. There was a doubling of the picoplankton ingestion rate for a sixfold increase in its concentration. The ingestion of autotrophic flagellates, however, increased at the same time as their concentration, indicating a preference for this type of food. Considering the range of concentrations typically found in the Ligurian Sea, the ingestion of pico- and nanoplankton brings 148 ng C polyp−1 day−1 and 28 ng N polyp−1 day−1. This type of food represents only ca. 4.5% of the total carbon gained by C. rubrum from the different sources, but might be the most important in terms of nitrogen, phosphorus, and other essential elements.
KeywordsIngestion Rate Heterotrophic Bacterium Experimental Chamber Seawater Temperature Soft Coral
We would like to thank Prof. D. Allemand (CSM) and Prof. L. Montaggioni (Univ. Aix-Marseille I) for their support in this work, which is part of the PhD thesis of M.P. funded by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Centre Scientifique de Monaco. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
- Bouillon J (1995) Classe des hydrozoaires. In: Grassé PP (ed) Traité de Zoologie: Cnidaires, Hydrozoaires, Scyphozoaires, Cubozoaires, Cténaires. Masson, Paris, pp 29–416Google Scholar
- Fabricius KE, Genin A, Benayahu Y (1995) Flow-dependent herbivory and growth in zooxanthellae-free soft corals. Limnol Oceanogr 31:878–887Google Scholar
- Grémare A, Amouroux JM, Charles F, Dinet A, Riaux-Gobin C, Baudart J, Medernach L, Bodiou JY, Vétion G, Colomines JC, Albert P (1997) Temporal changes in the biochemical composition and nutritional value of the particulate organic matter available to surface deposit-feeders: a two-year study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 150:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pile AJ, Patterson MR, Witman JD (1996) In situ grazing on plankton < 10 μm by the boreal sponge Mycale lingua. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 88:9–17Google Scholar
- Santangelo G, Abbiati M, Giannini F, Cicogna F (1993) Red coral fishing trends in the western Mediterranean Sea. Sci Mar 57:139–143Google Scholar
- Sheldon RW, Rassoulzadegan F (1987) A method for measuring plankton production by particle counting. Mar Microbiol Food Webs 2(1):29–44Google Scholar
- Shimeta J, Jumars PA (1991) Physical mechanisms and rates of particle capture by suspension-feeders. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 29:191–257Google Scholar
- True MA (1970) Etude quantitative de quatre peuplements sciaphiles sur substrat rocheux dans la region marseillaise. Bull Inst Oceanogr Monaco 69:1–48Google Scholar
- Tsounis G, Rossi S, Laudien J, Bramanti L, Fernàndez N, Gili J-M, Arntz W (2005) Diet and seasonal prey capture rates in the Mediterranean red coral (Corallium rubrum L.). Mar Biol (online first)Google Scholar
- Zibrowius H, Montero M, Grashoff M (1984) La repartition de Corallium rubrum dans l’Atlantique. Thetis 11:163–170Google Scholar