Marine Biology

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 353–365 | Cite as

The value of patches of intertidal seagrass to prawns depends on their proximity to mangroves

  • Greg A. SkilleterEmail author
  • Andrew Olds
  • Neil R. Loneragan
  • Yuri Zharikov
Research Article


Penaeid prawns were sampled with a small seine net to test whether catches of postlarvae and juveniles in seagrass were affected by the distance of the seagrass (mainly Zostera capricorni) from mangroves and the density of the seagrass in a subtropical marine embayment. Sampling was replicated on the western and eastern sides of Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Information on catches was combined with broad-scale spatial information on the distribution of habitats to estimate the contribution of four different categories of habitat (proximal dense seagrass, distal dense seagrass, proximal sparse seagrass, distal sparse seagrass) to the overall population of small prawns in these regions of Moreton Bay. The abundance of Penaeus plebejus and Metapenaeus bennettae was significantly and consistently greater in dense seagrass proximal to mangroves than in other types of habitat. Additionally, sparse seagrass close to mangroves supported more of these species than dense seagrass farther away, indicating that the role of spatial arrangement of habitats was more important than the effects of structural complexity alone. In contrast, the abundance of P. esculentus tended to be greatest in sparse seagrass distal from mangroves compared with the other habitats. The scaling up of the results from different seagrass types suggests that proximal seagrass beds on both sides of Moreton Bay provide by far the greatest contribution of juvenile M. bennettae and P. plebejus to the overall populations in the Bay.


Carapace Length Oyster Reef Seagrass Coverage Dense Seagrass Juvenile Blue Crab 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was funded by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, Project 2001/023, to GAS and NRL. The research was conducted under Animal Ethics Approval Zoo/Ent/383/03/FRDC. We would like to thank R. Baynes, T. Boggon, B. Cameron, A. Fargher, W. Holtzhauer, T. Lavery, M. Olds, M. Patenaude, J. Rueda, I. Shaw-McGill, J. Toon, and S. Walker for assistance with field sampling and B. Cameron, J. Toon, and S. Walker for assistance with laboratory work. The manuscript was improved by constructive comments from Kate Skilleter, Rob Kenyon, and three anonymous reviewers.


  1. Acosta CA (1999) Benthic dispersal of Caribbean spiny lobsters among insular habitats: implications for the conservation of exploited marine species. Conserv Biol 13:603–612Google Scholar
  2. Alongi DM (1990) Effect of mangrove detrital outwelling on nutrient regeneration and oxygen fluxes in coastal sediments of the central Great Barrier Reef Lagoon. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 31:581–588Google Scholar
  3. Arnold WS (1984) The effect of prey size, predator size, and sediment composition on the role of predation of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus Rothbun, on the hard clam, Mercenaria mercenaria (Linné). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 80:207–219Google Scholar
  4. Beck MW, Heck KL Jr, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ, Sheridan PF, Weinstein MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51:633–641Google Scholar
  5. Bell SS, Hall MO, Robbins BD (1995) Toward a landscape approach in seagrass beds: using macroalgal accumulation to address questions of scale. Oecologia 104:163–168Google Scholar
  6. Bishop JM, Khan MH (1999) Use of intertidal and adjacent mudflats by juvenile penaeid shrimps during 24-h tidal cycles. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 232:39–60Google Scholar
  7. Blaber SJM, Brewer DT, Salini JP, Kerr JD, Conacher C (1992) Species composition and biomass of fishes in tropical seagrasses at Grooyte Eylandt, Northern Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 29:509–531Google Scholar
  8. Branford JR (1981) Sediment and the distribution of penaeid shrimp in the Sudanese Red Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 13:349–354Google Scholar
  9. Bowden DA, Rowden AA, Attrill MJ (2001) Effect of patch size and in-patch location on the infaunal macroinvertebrate assemblages of Zostera marina seagrass beds. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 259:133–154Google Scholar
  10. Chong VC, Sasekumar A, Leh MUC, Cruz RD (1990) The fish and prawn communities of a Malaysian coastal mangrove system, with comparisons to adjacent mudflats and inshore waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 31:703–722Google Scholar
  11. Coles RG, Greenwood JG (1983) Seasonal movement and size distribution of three commercially important Australian prawn species (Crustacea: Penaeidae) within an estuarine system. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 34:727–744Google Scholar
  12. Coles RG, Lee Long WJ (1985) Juvenile prawn biology and the distribution of seagrass prawn nursery grounds in the southeastern Gulf of Carpentaria. In: Rothlisberg PC, Hill BJ, Staples DJ (eds) Second Australian national prawn seminar. CSIRO, Cleveland, Queensland, pp 55–60Google Scholar
  13. Dall W (1958) Observations on the biology of the greentail prawn, Metapenaeus mastersii (Haswell) (Crustacea Decapoda: Penaeidae). Aust J Mar Freshw Res 9:111–134Google Scholar
  14. Dall W, Hill BJ, Rothlisberg PC, Staples DJ (1990) The biology of the Penaeidae. In: Blaxter JHS, Southward AJ (ed) Advances in marine biology, vol 27. Academic Press, London, pp 333–356Google Scholar
  15. Daniel PA, Robertson AI (1990) Epibenthos of mangrove waterways and open embayments: community structure and the relationship between exported mangrove detritus and epifaunal standing stocks. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 31:599–619Google Scholar
  16. Dennison WC, Abal EG (1999) Moreton Bay study: a scientific basis for the healthy waterways campaign. South East Queensland Regional Water Quality Management Strategy, Brisbane, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorenbosch M, Riel MC van, Nagelkerken I, Velde G van der (2004) The relationship of reef fish densities to the proximity of mangrove and seagrass nurseries. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 60:37–48Google Scholar
  18. Dumbauld BR, Armstrong DA, McDonald TL (1993) Use of oyster shell to enhance intertidal habitat and mitigate loss of Dungeness crab (Cancer magister) caused by dredging. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:381–390Google Scholar
  19. Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175Google Scholar
  20. Eggleston DB, Etherington LL, Elis WE (1998) Organism response to habitat patchiness: species and habitat-dependent recruitment of decapod crustaceans. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 223:111–132Google Scholar
  21. Eggleston DB, Elis WE, Etherington LL, Dahlgren CP, Posey MH (1999) Organism responses to habitat fragmentation and diversity: habitat colonization by estuarine macrofauna. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236:107–132Google Scholar
  22. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Gabric AJ, McEwan J, Bell PRF (1998) Water quality and phytoplankton dynamics in Moreton Bay, south-eastern Queensland I. Field survey and satellite data. Mar Freshw Res 49:215–225Google Scholar
  24. Gong WK, Ong JE, Wong CH, Dhanarajah G (1984) Productivity of mangrove trees and its significance in managed mangrove ecosystem in Malaysia. In: Soepadmo E, Rao AN, MacIntosh DJ (eds) Proceedings of the Asian symposium on mangrove environment: research and management. Ardyas, Kuala Lumpur, pp 216–225Google Scholar
  25. Guest MA, Connolly RM, Loneragan NR (2003) Seine nets and beam trawls compared by day and night for sampling fish and crustaceans in shallow seagrass habitat. Fish Res 64:185–196Google Scholar
  26. Gunter G, Christmas JY, Killebrew R (1964) Some relations of salinity to population distributions of motile estuarine organisms, with special reference to penaeid shrimp. Ecology 45:181–185Google Scholar
  27. Halpern BS (2004) Are mangroves a limiting resource for two coral reef fishes? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 272:93–98Google Scholar
  28. Hansen AJ, di Castri F (1992) Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanski I, Gilpin M (1997) Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  30. Haywood MDE, Vance DJ, Loneragan NR (1995) Seagrass and algal beds as nursery habitats for tiger prawns (Penaeus semisulcatus and P. esculentus) in a tropical Australian estuary. Mar Biol 122:213–223Google Scholar
  31. Hill BJ, Wassenberg TJ (1993) Why are some prawns found in seagrass: an experimental study of brown (Penaeus esculentus) and grooved (P. semisulcatus) tiger prawns. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 44:221–227Google Scholar
  32. Hovel KA, Lipcius RN (2001) Habitat fragmentation in a seagrass landscape: patch size and complexity control blue crab survival. Ecology 82:1814–1829Google Scholar
  33. Hovel KA, Lipcius RN (2002) Effects of seagrass habitat fragmentation on juvenile blue crab survival and abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 271:75–98Google Scholar
  34. Hyland SJ, Courtney AJ, Butler CT (1989) Distribution of seagrass in the Moreton Region from Coolangatta to Noosa. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland Government Printers, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  35. Irlandi EA (1996) The effects of seagrass patch size and energy regime on growth of a suspension-feeding bivalve. J Mar Res 54:161–185Google Scholar
  36. Irlandi EA (1997) Seagrass patch size and survivorship of an infaunal bivalve. Oikos 78:511–518Google Scholar
  37. Irlandi EA, Crawford MK (1997) Habitat linkages: the effects of intertidal saltmarshes and adjacent subtidal habitats on abundance, movement, and growth of an estuarine fish. Oecologia 110:222–230Google Scholar
  38. Irlandi EA, Ambrose WG Jr, Orlando BA (1995) Landscape ecology and the marine environment: how seagrass landscapes influence growth and survival of juvenile bay scallops. Oikos 72:307–313Google Scholar
  39. Irlandi EA, Orlando BA, Ambrose WG (1999) Influence of seagrass habitat patch size on growth and survival of juvenile bay scallops, Argopecten irradians concentricus (Say). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:21–43Google Scholar
  40. Johnson AR, Milne BT, Wiens JA, Crist TO (1992) Animal movements and population dynamics in heterogeneous landscapes. Landscape Ecol 7:63–75Google Scholar
  41. Joshi PK, Kulkarni GK, Nagabhushanam R (1979) Studies on the behaviour and substratum preference in juveniles of the marine prawn Metapenaeus monoceros (Fabricius). Hydrobiologia 65:195–198Google Scholar
  42. Kareiva P (1990) Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 330:175–190Google Scholar
  43. Kenyon RA, Loneragan NR, Hughes JM (1995) Habitat type and light affect sheltering behaviour of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus Haswell) and success rates of their fish predators. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 192:87–105Google Scholar
  44. Kenyon RA, Loneragan NR, Hughes JM, Staples DJ (1997) Habitat preference of juvenile tiger prawns Penaeus esculentus and Penaeus semisulcatus in the western Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 45:393–403Google Scholar
  45. Kneib RT, Wagner SL (1994) Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 106:227–238Google Scholar
  46. Koch MS, Madden CJ (2001) Patterns of primary production and nutrient availability in a Bahamas lagoon with fringing mangroves. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 219:109–119Google Scholar
  47. Laegdsgaard P, Johnson CR (1995) Mangrove habitats as nurseries: unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 126:67–81Google Scholar
  48. Laegdsgaard P, Johnson CR (2001) Why do fish utilise mangrove habitats? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 257:229–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu H, Loneragan NR (1997) Size and time of day affect the response of postlarvae and early juvenile grooved tiger prawns Penaeus semisulcatus De Haan (Decapoda: Penaeidae) to natural and artificial seagrass in the laboratory. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:263–277Google Scholar
  50. Loneragan NR, Kenyon RA, Haywood MDE, Staples DJ (1994) Population dynamics of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus and P. semisulcatus) in seagrass habitats of the western Gulf of Carpentaria. Mar Biol 119:133–143Google Scholar
  51. Loneragan NR, Kenyon RA, Staples DJ, Poiner IR, Conacher CA (1998) The influence of seagrass type on the distribution and abundance of postlarval and juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus and P. semisulcatus) in the western Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 228:175–195Google Scholar
  52. Loneragan NR, Haywood MDE, Heales DS, Kenyon RA, Pendrey RP, Vance DJ (2001) Estimating the influence of prawn stocking density and seagrass type on the growth of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus semisulcatus): results from field experiments in small enclosures. Mar Biol 139:343–354Google Scholar
  53. Lucas C (1974) Preliminary estimates of stocks of the king prawn Penaeus plebejus, in south-east Queensland. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 25:35–47Google Scholar
  54. Manson FJ, Loneragan NR, Skilleter GA, Phinn SR (2005) An evaluation of the evidence for linkages between mangroves and fisheries: a synthesis of the literature and identification of research directions. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev (in press)Google Scholar
  55. Masel JM, Smallwood DG (2000) Habitat usage by postlarval and juvenile prawns in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Proc R Soc Qld 109:107–117Google Scholar
  56. McIvor CC, Rozas LP (1999) Direct nekton use of intertidal saltmarsh habitat and linkage with adjacent habitats: a review from the southeastern United States. In: Nordstrom KF, Roman CT (eds) Estuarine shores: evolution, environments and human alterations. Wiley, West Sussex, England, pp 311–334Google Scholar
  57. Micheli F, Peterson CH (1999) Estuarine vegetated habitats as corridors for predator movements. Conserv Biol 13:869–881Google Scholar
  58. Montgomery SS (1990) Movements of juvenile eastern king prawns, Penaeus plebejus, and identification of stock along the east coast of Australia. Fish Res 9:189–208Google Scholar
  59. Mumby PJ, Edwards AJ, Arias-Gonzalez JE, Lindeman KC, Blackwell PG, Gall A, Gorczynska MI, Harborne AR, Pescod CL, Renken H, Wabnitz CCC, Llewellyn G (2004) Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean. Nature 427:533–536Google Scholar
  60. Nagelkerken I, Kleijnen S, Klop T, Brand RACJ van den, Cocheret de la Morinière E, Velde G van der (2001) Dependence of Caribbean reef fishes on mangroves and seagrass beds as nursery habitats: a comparison of fish faunas between bays with and without mangroves/seagrass beds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:225–235Google Scholar
  61. O’Brien CJ (1994) Population dynamics of juvenile tiger prawns Penaeus esculentus in south Queensland, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 104:247–256Google Scholar
  62. Parish JD (1989) Fish communities of interacting shallow-water habitats in tropical oceanic regions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:143–160Google Scholar
  63. Puth LM, Wilson KA (2001) Boundaries and corridors as a continuum of ecological flow control: lessons from rivers and streams. Conserv Biol 15:21–30Google Scholar
  64. Raposa KB, Oviatt CA (2000) The influence of contiguous shoreline type, distance from shore and vegetation biomass on nekton community structure in eelgrass beds. Estuaries 23:46–55Google Scholar
  65. Robbins BD, Bell SS (1994) Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. Trends Ecol Evol 9:301–304Google Scholar
  66. Robertson AI (1988) Abundance, diet and predators of juvenile banana prawns, Penaeus merguiensis, in a tropical mangrove estuary. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 39:467–478Google Scholar
  67. Robertson AI, Blaber SJM (1992) Plankton, epibenthos and fish communities. In: Robertson AI, Alongi DM (ed) Tropical mangrove ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 173–224Google Scholar
  68. Robertson AI, Duke NC (1987) Mangroves as nursery sites: comparisons of the abundance and species composition of fish and crustaceans in mangroves and other nearshore habitats in tropical Australia. Mar Biol 96:193–206Google Scholar
  69. Robertson AI, Daniel PA, Dixon P (1991) Mangrove forest structure and productivity in the Fly River estuary, Papua New Guinea. Mar Biol 111:147–155Google Scholar
  70. Rönnbäck P, Macia A, Almqvist G, Schultz L, Troell M (2002) Do penaeid shrimps have a preference for mangrove habitats? Distribution pattern analysis on Inhaca island, Mozambique. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 55:427–436Google Scholar
  71. Rozas LP, Odum WE (1987) The role of submerged aquatic vegetation in influencing the abundance of nekton on contiguous tidal fresh-water marshes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 114:289–300Google Scholar
  72. Ruello NV (1973) Burrowing, feeding and spatial distribution of the school prawn Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell) in the Hunter River region, Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 13:189–206Google Scholar
  73. Rulifson RA (1981) Substrate preferences of juvenile penaeid shrimps in estuarine habitats. Contrib Mar Sci 24:35–52Google Scholar
  74. Sheaves M, Molony B (2000) Short-circuit in the mangrove food chain. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 199:97–109Google Scholar
  75. Skilleter GA, Loneragan NR (2003) Assessing the importance of coastal habitats for fisheries, biodiversity and marine reserves: a new approach taking into account “habitat mosaics”. In: Beumer JP, Grant A, Smith DC (eds) Aquatic protected areas—what works best and how do we know? University of Queensland Printery, St Lucia, Queensland, pp 240–249Google Scholar
  76. Somers IF (1987) Sediment type as a factor in the distribution of the commercial prawn species of the western Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 38:133–150Google Scholar
  77. Somers IF, Kirkwood GP (1984) Movements of tagged tiger prawns, Penaeus spp. in the western Gulf of Carpentaria. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 35:713–723Google Scholar
  78. Staples DJ, Vance DJ, Heales DS (1985) Habitat requirements of juvenile penaeid prawns and their relationship to offshore fisheries. In: Rothlisberg PC, Hill BJ, Staples DJ (ed) Second Australian national prawn seminar NPS2. CSIRO, Cleveland, Queensland, pp 47–54Google Scholar
  79. Stockhausen WT, Lipcius RN (2003) Simulated effects of seagrass loss and restoration on settlement and recruitment of blue crab postlarvae and juveniles in the York River, Chesapeake Bay. Bull Mar Sci 72:409–422Google Scholar
  80. Thayer GW, Colby DR, Hettler WF Jr (1987) Utilization of the red mangrove prop root habitat by fishes in south Florida. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 35:25–38Google Scholar
  81. Thomas BE, Connolly RM (2001) Fish use of subtropical saltmarshes in Queensland, Australia: relationships with vegetation, water depth and distance onto the marsh. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 209:275–288Google Scholar
  82. Trainor N (1990) Review of the east coast otter trawl fishery. Qld Fisherman 8:25–32Google Scholar
  83. Trainor N (1991) Longterm changes in the Moreton Bay prawn trawl fishery. Qld Fisherman 9:21–28Google Scholar
  84. Turner SJ, Hewitt JE, Wilkinson MR, Morrisey DJ, Thrush SF, Cummings VJ, Funnel G (1999) Seagrass patches and landscapes: the influence of wind-wave dynamics and hierarchical arrangements of spatial structure on macrofaunal seagrass communities. Estuaries 22:1016–1032Google Scholar
  85. Underwood AJ (1981) Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 19:513–605Google Scholar
  86. Vance DJ, Haywood MDE, Heales DS, Kenyon RA, Loneragan NR, Pendrey RC (1996) How far do prawns and fish move into mangroves? Distribution of juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and fish in a tropical mangrove forest in northern Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 131:115–124Google Scholar
  87. Vance DJ, Haywood MDE, Heales DS, Kenyon RA, Loneragan NR (1998) Seasonal and annual variation in abundance of postlarval and juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and environmental variation in two estuaries in tropical northeastern Australia: a six year study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163:21–36Google Scholar
  88. Vance DJ, Haywood MDE, Heales DS, Kenyon RA, Loneragan NR, Pendrey RC (2002) Distribution of juvenile penaeid prawns in mangrove forests in a tropical Australian estuary, with particular reference to Penaeus merguiensis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 228:165–177Google Scholar
  89. Wassenberg TJ, Hill BJ (1987) Natural diet of the tiger prawns Penaeus esculentus and P. semisulcatus. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 38:169–182Google Scholar
  90. Williams AB (1958) Substrates as a factor in shrimp distribution. Limnol Oceanogr 3:283–290Google Scholar
  91. Williams L (1991) Moreton Bay a productive fishery. Qld Fisherman 9:23–26Google Scholar
  92. Yáñez-Arancibia A, Lara-Domínguez AL, Day JW (1993) Interactions between mangrove and seagrass habitats mediated by estuarine nekton assemblages: coupling of primary and secondary production. Hydrobiologia 264:1–12Google Scholar
  93. Young PC (1975) Preliminary observations on the environment and biology of juvenile king prawns (Penaeus plebejus) in Moreton Bay, Queensland. In: Young PC (ed) First Australian national prawn seminar. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, pp 18–36Google Scholar
  94. Young PC (1978) Moreton Bay, Queensland: a nursery area for juvenile penaeid prawns. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 29:55–75Google Scholar
  95. Young PC, Carpenter SM (1977) Recruitment of postlarval prawns to nursery areas in Moreton Bay, Queensland. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 28:745–773Google Scholar
  96. Zharikov Y, Skilleter GA, Loneragan NR, Taranto T, Cameron BE (2005) Mapping and characterising subtropical estuarine landscapes using aerial photography and GIS for potential applications in wildlife conservation and management. Biol Conserv (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg A. Skilleter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew Olds
    • 1
  • Neil R. Loneragan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yuri Zharikov
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine and Estuarine Ecology Unit, School of Integrative BiologyUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Cleveland Marine LaboratoriesCSIRO Division of Marine ResearchClevelandAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Fish and Fisheries, Division of Science and EngineeringMurdoch UniversityMurdochAustralia

Personalised recommendations