Differences in kelp morphology between wave sheltered and exposed localities: morphologically plastic or fixed traits?
- 943 Downloads
The ability of algae to change the shape of their thallus in response to the environment may be of functional and ecological importance to the alga, with many species of macroalgae exhibiting a great range of morphological variation across wave exposure gradients. However, differences in morphology detected between sheltered and exposed environments cannot determine whether such differences represent plastic responses to the local environment or whether morphology is genetically fixed. This study tested for differences in the morphology of the common kelp, Ecklonia radiata, between wave sheltered and exposed environments, and reciprocally transplanted juveniles to distinguish the nature of such differences (i.e. plastic vs fixed traits). Differences between exposure environments were consistent with known effects of exposure (i.e. a wide, thin thallus at sheltered sites and a narrow, thick thallus with a thick stipe at exposed sites). The reciprocal transplant experiment confirmed that morphological plasticity was the mechanism enabling this alga to display different patterns in morphology between exposure environments. Individuals transplanted to the exposed environment underwent a rapid and extreme response in morphology, which was not apparent in individuals transplanted to the sheltered environment that responded more slowly. These results suggest that stressors typical of sheltered environments (i.e. diffusion stress) may not be as influential (if at all) compared to stressors typical of exposed environments (i.e. breakage, dislodgement) in differentiating morphological characters between exposure environments.
KeywordsWave Height Plastic Response Wave Exposure Recipient Site Exposed Site
This work could not have been completed without the logistical support of B. Russell, S. Hart and D. Gorman. This work was supported by a postgraduate award to M.J.F and an ARC grant to S.D.C.
- Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46Google Scholar
- Baardseth E (1970) A square-scanning, two-stage sampling method of estimating seaweed quantities, vol 20. Report of the Norwegian Institute of Seaweed Research, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Bäck S (1993) Morphological variation of northern Baltic Fucus vesiculosus along the exposure gradient. Annu Bot Fenn 30:275–283Google Scholar
- Cheshire AC, Hallam ND (1989) Morphological differences in the Southern Bull-Kelp (Durvillaea potatorum) throughout South-Eastern Australia. Bot Mar 32:191–197Google Scholar
- Johnson AS, Koehl MAR (1994) Maintenance of dynamic strain similarity and environmental stress factor in different flow habitats: thallus allometry and material properties of a giant kelp. J Environ Biol 195:381–410Google Scholar
- Koehl MAR (1986) Seaweeds in moving water: Form and mechanical function. In: Gavinish T (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 603–634Google Scholar
- Molloy FJ, Bolton JJ (1996) The effects of wave exposure and depth on the morphology of inshore populations of the Namibian kelp, Laminaria schinzii Foslie. Bot Mar 39:525–531Google Scholar
- Sultan SE (2001) Phenotypic plasticity and ecological breadth in plants. Am Zool 41:1599Google Scholar
- Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology. Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 504Google Scholar