Marine Biology

, Volume 145, Issue 1, pp 121–132 | Cite as

Community structure in Florida Escarpment seep and Snake Pit (Mid-Atlantic Ridge) vent mussel beds

Research Article


Comparisons between invertebrate communities hosted by similar foundation species under different environmental conditions permit identification of patterns of species distributions that might be characteristic of the different ecosystems. Similarities and differences in community structure between two major types of chemosynthetic ecosystems were assessed by analyzing samples of invertebrates associated with Bathymodiolus heckerae Gustafson et al. mussel beds at the Florida Escarpment seep (Gulf of Mexico, 26°01.8′N; 84°54.9′W; October 2000) and B. puteoserpentis von Cosel et al. mussel beds at the Snake Pit vent (Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 23°22.1′N; 44°56.9′W; July 2001). Macrofaunal species richness was nearly twice as high in the seep mussel bed compared to the vent mussel bed, and only a single morphospecies, the ophiuroid Ophioctenella acies Tyler et al., was shared between the sites. Similarities between the two faunas at higher taxonomic levels (genus and family) were evident for only a small percentage of the total number of taxa, suggesting that evolutionary histories of many of these seep and vent macrofaunal taxa are not shared. The taxonomic distinctiveness of the seep and vent mussel-bed macrofaunal communities supports the hypothesis that environmental and oceanographic barriers prevent most taxa from occupying both types of habitats. Macrofaunal community heterogeneity among samples was similar in seep and vent mussel beds, indicating that spatial scales of processes regulating community variability may be similar in the two types of ecosystems. Suspension feeders were not represented in the macrofauna of seep or vent mussel beds. Primary consumers (deposit feeders and grazers) contributed more to the total abundance of macrofauna of seep mussel beds than vent mussel beds; secondary consumers (polychaetes and shrimp) were more abundant in the vent mussel beds.



We thank the captain and crew of the R.V. “Atlantis”, the pilots and crew of the D.S.V. “Alvin”, and the shipboard scientific parties for assistance in collecting and processing samples. We also thank M. Doerries, K. Knick, S. Rapaport, E. Raulfs, M. Ward, and C. Zoon for assistance in sorting samples and are grateful to A. Warén, P. Tyler, K. Fauchald, M. Hooge, and S. Tyler, who helped us with identifications. R. Lipcius and S. Ware contributed to the development of this manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers provided valuable critiques of the original manuscript. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Division of Biological Oceanography; OCE-988550, OCE-9982999), NOAA’s National Undersea Research Program—University of North Carolina, Wilmington, and the College of William and Mary. Work completed in this study complied with the current laws of the country in which they were undertaken.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material

app.pdf (85 kb)
(PDF 80 KB)


  1. Biscoito M, Segonzac M, Almeida AJ, Desbruyères D, Geistdoerfer P, Turnipseed M, Van Dover CL (2002) Fishes from the hydrothermal vents and cold seeps—an update. Cah Biol Mar 43:359–362Google Scholar
  2. Boulègue J, Iiyama JT, Charlou JL, Jedwab J (1987) Nankai Trough, Japan Trench and Kuril Trench: geochemistry of fluids sampled by submersible ‘Nautile’. Earth Planet Sci Lett 10:177–181Google Scholar
  3. Brusca RC, Brusca GJ (2003) Invertebrates, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Carney RS (1994) Consideration of the oasis analogy for chemosynthetic communities at Gulf of Mexico hydrocarbon vents. Geo-Mar Lett 14:149–159Google Scholar
  5. Cavanaugh CM (1983) Symbiotic chemoautotrophic bacteria in marine invertebrates from sulphide-rich habitats. Nature 302:58–61Google Scholar
  6. Cavanaugh CM, Levering PR, Maki JS, Mitchell R, Lidstrom M (1987) Symbiosis of methylotrophic bacteria and deep-sea mussels. Nature 325:346–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavanaugh CM, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW (1992) Evidence for methylotrophic symbionts in a hydrothermal vent mussel (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3799–3803Google Scholar
  8. Chanton JP, Martens CS, Paull CK, Coston JA (1993) Sulfur isotope and porewater geochemistry of Florida Escarpment seep sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:1253–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chevaldonné P, Jollivet D, Feldman RA, Desbruyères D, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC (1998) Commensal scale-worms of the genus Branchipolynoe (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) at deep-sea hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. Cah Biol Mar 39:347–350Google Scholar
  10. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Primer-E, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. Colaço A, Dehairs F, Desbruyères D (2002) Nutritional relations of deep-sea hydrothermal fields at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: a stable isotope approach. Deep-Sea Res I 49:395–412Google Scholar
  13. Colwell RK (1997) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, version 5. User’s guide and application. Available at
  14. Cosson-Sarradin N, Sibuet M, Paterson GLJ, Vangriesheim A (1998) Polychaete diversity at tropical Atlantic deep-sea sites: environmental effects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 165:173–185Google Scholar
  15. Craddock C, Hoch WR, Gustafson RG, Lutz RA, Hashimoto J, Vrijenhoek RC (1995) Evolutionary relationships among deep-sea mytilids (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) from hydrothermal vents and cold-water methane/sulfide seeps. Mar Biol 121:477–485Google Scholar
  16. Desbruyères D, Almeida A, Biscoito M, Cometet T, Khripounoff A, Le Bris N, Sarradin PM, Segonzac M (2000) A review of the distribution of hydrothermal vent communities along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge: dispersal vs. environmental controls. Hydrobiologia 440:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felbeck H, Childress JJ, Somero GN (1981) Calvin–Benson cycle and sulfide oxidation enzymes in animals from sulfide-rich habitats. Nature 293:291–293Google Scholar
  18. Fisher CR, Urcuyo IA, Simpkins MA, Nix E (1997) Life in the slow lane: growth and longevity of cold-seep vestimentiferans. Mar Ecol 18:83–94Google Scholar
  19. Fouquet Y, Wafik A, Cambon P, Mevel C, Meyer G, Gente P (1993) Tectonic setting and mineralogical and geochemical zonation in the Snake Pit sulfide deposit (Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 23°N). Econ Geol Bull Soc Econ Geol 88:2018–2036Google Scholar
  20. Frouin P, Hutchings P (2001) Macrobenthic communities in a tropical lagoon (Tahiti, French Polynesia, Central Pacific). Coral Reefs 19:277–285Google Scholar
  21. Gebruk AV, Chevaldonne P, Shank TM, Vrijenhoek RC, Lutz RA (2000) Deep-sea hydrothermal communities of the Logatchev area (14°45′N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge): diverse biotopes and high biomass. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grassle JF, Brown-Leger LS, Morse-Porteous L, Petrecca R, Williams I (1985) Deep-sea fauna of sediments in the vicinity of hydrothermal vents. Biol Soc Wash Bull 6:443–452Google Scholar
  23. Guinot D (1989) Description de Segonzacia mesatlantica (Williams): campagne HYDROSNAKE 1988 sur la dorsale médio-Atlantique (Crustacea Decapoda Brachyura). Bull Mus Natn Hist Nat Sect A Zool Biol Ecol Anim 11:203–231Google Scholar
  24. Hashimoto J, Ohta S, Fujikura K, Miura T (1995) Microdistribution pattern and biogeography of the hydrothermal vent communities of the Minami-Ensei Knoll in the Mid-Okinawa Trough, western Pacific. Deep-Sea Res I 42:577–598Google Scholar
  25. Hayek LC, Buzas MA (1997) Surveying natural populations. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hecker B (1985) Fauna from a cold sulfur-seep in the Gulf of Mexico: comparison with hydrothermal vent communities and evolutionary implications. Bull Biol Soc Wash 6:465–473Google Scholar
  27. Hoeisaeter T, Johannessen PJ (2001) Xylodiscula planata sp. nov., a “lower” heterobranch gastropod from Norwegian waters. Sarsia 86:325–332Google Scholar
  28. Karson JA, Brown JR (1988) Geologic setting of the Snake Pit hydrothermal site: an active vent field on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Mar Geophys Res 10:91–107Google Scholar
  29. Kulm LD, Suess E, Moore JC, Carson B, Lewis BT, Ritger SD, Kadko DC, Thornburg TM, Embley RW, Rugh WD, Massoth GJ, Langseth MG, Cochrane GR, Scamman RL (1986) Oregon subduction zone: venting, fauna and carbonates. Science 231:561–566Google Scholar
  30. Lalou C, Reyss JL, Brichet E, Arnold M, Thompson G, Fouquet Y, Rona PA (1993) New age data for Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal sites—TAG and Snake Pit chronology revisited. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 98B:9705–9713Google Scholar
  31. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. Levin LA, Huggett CL, Wishner KF (1991) Control of deep-sea benthic community structure by oxygen and organic-matter gradients in the eastern Pacific Ocean. J Mar Res 49:763–800Google Scholar
  33. Luther GW III, Rozan TF, Taillefert M, Nuzzio DB, Di Meo C, Shank TM, Lutz RA, Cary SC (2001) Chemical speciation drives hydrothermal vent ecology. Nature 410:813–816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall BA (1994) Deep-sea gastropods from the New Zealand region associated with recent whale bones and an Eocene turtle. Nautilus 108:1–8Google Scholar
  35. Martens CS, Chanton JP, Paull CK (1991) Biogenic methane in the Florida Escarpment brine seeps. Geology (Boulder) 19:851–857Google Scholar
  36. Menge BA, Branch GM (2001) Rocky intertidal communities. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., USA, pp 221–251Google Scholar
  37. Mevel C, Auzende J-M, Cannat M, Donval J-P, Dubois J, Fouquet Y, Gente P, Grimaud D, Karson J, Segonzac M, Stievenard M (1989) La ride du Snake Pit (dorsale médio-Atlantique 23°22′N): résultats préliminaires de la campagne HYDROSNAKE. C R Acad Sci Ser II A Sci Terre Planetes 308:545–552Google Scholar
  38. Micheli F, Peterson CH, Mullineaux LS, Fisher CR, Mills SW, Sancho G, Johnson G, Lenihan HS (2002) Predation structures communities at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Ecol Monogr 72:365–382Google Scholar
  39. Paull CK, Hecker B, Commeau R, Freeman-Lynde RP, Newmann C, Corso WP, Golubie S, Hook JE, Sikes E, Curray J (1984) Biological communities at the Florida Escarpment resemble hydrothermal vent taxa. Science 226:965–967Google Scholar
  40. Paull CK, Chanton JP, Martens CS, Fullagar PD, Neumann AC, Coston JA (1991) Seawater circulation through the flank of the Florida Platform: evidence and implications. Mar Geol 102:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peek AS, Gaut BS, Feldman RA, Barry JP, Kochevar RE, Lutz RA, Vrijenhoek RC (2000) Neutral and non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation in deep-sea clams from the family Vesicomyidae. J Mol Evol 50:141–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rex MA, Stuart CT, Coyne G (2000) Latitudinal gradients of species richness in the deep-sea benthos of the North Atlantic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4082–4085PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson JJ, Polz MF, Fiala-Medioni A, Cavanaugh CM (1998) Physiological and immunological evidence for two distinct C1-utilizing pathways in Bathymodiolus puteoserpentis (Bivalvia: Mytilidae), a dual endosymbiotic mussel from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Mar Biol 132:625–633Google Scholar
  44. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Rouse GW, Pleijel F (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Sahling H, Rickert D, Lee RW, Linke P, Suess E (2002) Macrofaunal community structure and sulfide flux at gas hydrate deposits from the Cascadia convergent margin, NE Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:121–138Google Scholar
  47. Scheltema AH (1991) Helicoradomenia juani gen. et sp. nov., a Pacific hydrothermal vent Aplacophora (Mollusca: Neomeniomorpha). Veliger 34:195–203Google Scholar
  48. Scott KM, Fisher CR (1995) Physiological ecology of sulfide metabolism in hydrothermal vent and cold seep vesicomyid clams and vestimentiferan tube worms. Am Zool 35:102–111Google Scholar
  49. Segonzac M (1992) The hydrothermal vent communities of Snake Pit area (Mid-Atlantic Ridge 23°N, 3480 m)—megafaunal composition and microdistribution. C R Acad Sci Ser III Life Sci 314:593–600Google Scholar
  50. Segonzac M, de Saint Laurent M, Casanova B (1993) L’énigme du comportement trophique des crevettes Alvinocarididae des sites hydrothermaux de la dorsale médio-Atlantique. Cah Biol Mar 34:535–571Google Scholar
  51. Sibuet M, Olu K (1998) Biogeography, biodiversity, and fluid dependence of deep-sea cold-seep communities at active and passive margins. Deep-Sea Res II 45:517–567Google Scholar
  52. Smirnov AV, Gebruk AV, Galkin SV, Shank T (2000) New species of holothurian (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) from hydrothermal vent habitats. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 80:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sudarikov SM, Galkin SV (1995) Geochemistry of the Snake Pit vent field and its implications for vent and non-vent fauna. In: Parson LM, Walker CL, Dixon DR (eds) Hydrothermal vents and processes. Special publication 87, Geological Society, London, pp 249–256Google Scholar
  54. Suess E, Bohrmann G, von Huene R, Linke P, Wallmann K, Winckler G, Lutz RA, Orange D (1998) Fluid venting in the Aleutian subduction zone. J Geophys Res 103:2597–2614Google Scholar
  55. Sysoev AV, Kantor YI (1995) Two new species of Phymorhynchus (Gastropoda, Conoidea, Conidae) from the hydrothermal vents. Ruthenica 5:17–26Google Scholar
  56. Tsuchiya M, Nishihira M (1986) Islands of Mytilus edulis as a habitat for small intertidal animals; effect of Mytilus age structure on the species composition of the associated fauna and community organization. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 31:171–178Google Scholar
  57. Tsurumi M (2003) Diversity at hydrothermal vents. Global Ecol Biogeogr Lett 12:181–190Google Scholar
  58. Tsurumi M, Tunnicliffe V (2003) Tubeworm-associated communities at hydrothermal vents on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. Deep-Sea Res I 50:611–629Google Scholar
  59. Tsurumi M, de Graaf RC, Tunnicliffe V (2003) Distributional and biological aspects of copepods at hydrothermal vents on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific ocean. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tunnicliffe V (1991) The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 29:319–417Google Scholar
  61. Tunnicliffe V, Fowler CMR (1996) Influence of sea-floor spreading on the global hydrothermal vent fauna. Nature 379:531–533Google Scholar
  62. Tunnicliffe V, McArthur AG, McHugh D (1998) A biogeographical perspective of the deep-sea hydrothermal vent fauna. Adv Mar Biol 34:353–442Google Scholar
  63. Turnipseed M, Knick KE, Lipcius RN, Dreyer J, Van Dover CL (2003) Diversity in mussel beds at deep-sea hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. Ecol Lett 6:518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tyler PA, Paterson GJL, Sibuet M, Guille A, Murton BJ, Segonzac M (1995) A new genus of ophiuroid (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from hydrothermal mounds along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 75:977–986Google Scholar
  65. Van Dover CL (1995) Ecology of Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vents. In: Parson LM, Walker CL, Dixon DR (eds) Hydrothermal vents and processes. Special publication 87, Geological Society, London, pp 257–294Google Scholar
  66. Van Dover CL (2000) The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., USAGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Dover CL (2002) Community structure of mussel beds at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 230:137–158Google Scholar
  68. Van Dover CL (2003) Variation in community structure within hydrothermal-vent mussel beds of the East Pacific Rise. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:55–66Google Scholar
  69. Van Dover CL, Trask JL (2000) Diversity at deep-sea hydrothermal vent and intertidal mussel beds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 195:169–178Google Scholar
  70. Van Dover CL, German CR, Speer KG, Parson LM, Vrijenhoek RC (2002) Evolution and biogeography of deep-sea vent and seep invertebrates. Science 295:1253–1257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Van Dover CL, Aharon P, Bernhard JM, Caylor E, Doerries M, Flickinger W, Gilhooly W, Goffredi SK, Knick K, Macko SA, Rapoport S, Raulfs EC, Ruppel C, Salerno J, Seitz RD, Sen Gupta BK, Shank T, Turnipseed M, Vrijenhoek R (2003) Blake Ridge methane seeps: characterization of a soft-sediment, chemosynthetically based ecosystem. Deep-Sea Res I 50:281–300Google Scholar
  72. Voight JR (2000) A review of predators and predation at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Cah Biol Mar 41:155–166Google Scholar
  73. von Cosel R, Olu K (1998) Gigantism in Mytilidae. A new Bathymodiolus from cold seep areas on the Barbados Accretionary Prism. C R Acad Sci Ser III Life Sci 321:655–663Google Scholar
  74. Von Damm KL (1995) Controls on the chemistry and temporal variability of seafloor hydrothermal fluids. In: Humphris SE, Zierenberg RA, Mullineaux LS, Thomson RE (eds) Seafloor hydrothermal systems. Geophysical monograph 91, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp 222–247Google Scholar
  75. Ward ME, Jenkins CD, Van Dover CL (2003) Functional morphology and feeding strategy of the hydrothermal-vent polychaete Archinome rosacea (family Archinomidae). Can J Zool 81:582–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Warén A, Bouchet P (1989) New gastropods from East Pacific hydrothermal vents. Zool Scr 18:67–102Google Scholar
  77. Warén A, Bouchet P (1993) New records, species, genera, and a new family of gastropods from hydrothermal vents and hydrocarbon seeps. Zool Scr 22:1–90Google Scholar
  78. Warén A, Bouchet P (2001) Gastropoda and Monoplacophora from hydrothermal vents and seeps; new taxa and records. Veliger 44:116–231Google Scholar
  79. Warwick RM, Clarke KR (1995) New ‘biodiversity’ measures of community stress reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 129:301–305Google Scholar
  80. Williams AB (1988) New marine decapod crustaceans from waters influenced by hydrothermal discharge, brine, and hydrocarbon seepage. Fish Bull (Wash DC) 86:263–287Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Turnipseed
    • 1
  • C. D. Jenkins
    • 1
  • C. L. Van Dover
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentThe College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations