Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 144, Issue 5, pp 1019–1027 | Cite as

The effects of light and thallus scour from Ecklonia radiata canopy on an associated foliose algal assemblage: the importance of photoacclimation

  • Benjamin TooheyEmail author
  • Gary A. Kendrick
  • Thomas Wernberg
  • Julia C. Phillips
  • Sairah Malkin
  • Jane Prince
Research Article

Abstract

Kelp canopies have long been recognised for their influence on the structure of algal assemblages on sublittoral reefs. In Marmion Lagoon, Western Australia, we investigated how a canopy of the small kelp Ecklonia radiata affected the associated foliose algal assemblage and what potential mechanisms were responsible for the effects we observed. Light levels and physical abrasion (thallus scour) by an E. radiata canopy were manipulated in an orthogonal fixed-factor experiment that revealed that changes in light, but not thallus scour, had a significant effect on the composition of the algal assemblage. Reduced light levels were associated with a decrease in the Shannon-Wiener diversity index and an increased dominance of the foliose algae Pterocladia lucida and Rhodymenia sonderi. Photobiological investigations of three foliose species, P. lucida, R. sonderi and Chauviniella coriifolia indicated that they were able to photoacclimate to low light levels by increasing thallus absorption by up to 11%. Photoacclimation was also evident by an increase in the maximum rate of electron transport under low-light conditions. We conclude that the E. radiata canopy in Marmion Lagoon structures the foliose algal assemblage through the modification of the light environment and that this effect may be mediated by differences in the ability of different species of foliose algae to photoacclimate.

Keywords

Kelp Forest Algal Assemblage Pulse Amplitude Modulate Light Climate Canopy Shading 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

For their assistance, we thank A. Smit, M. Vanderklift, D. Gull, N. Harman, S. Whalan, F. Tomàs Nash and M. Kleczkowski. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved our manuscript. Financial support was provided through a small Australian Research Council grant to G. Kendrick and a BSc (Honours) grant to B. Toohey from the Schools of Plant and Animal Biology, University of Western Australia. We declare that the experiments described in this manuscript comply with the current laws of Australia.

References

  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austr Ecol 26:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer S, Bjork M (2000) Measuring rates of photosynthesis of two tropical seagrasses by pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry. Aquat Bot 66:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer S, Larsson C, Poryan O, Axelsson L (2000) Photosynthetic rates of Ulva (Chlorophyta) measured by pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorometry. Eur J Phycol 35:69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beer S, Biork M, Gademann R, Ralph P (2001) Measurement of photosynthetic rates in seagrasses. In: Short FT, Coles RG, Short CA (eds) Global seagrass research methods. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 190–198Google Scholar
  5. Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1984) Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter RC (1990) Competition among marine macroalgae: a physiological perspective. J Phycol 26:6–12Google Scholar
  7. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell SD (2003a) The monopolization of understorey habitat by subtidal encrusting coralline algae: a test of the combined effects of canopy-mediated light and sedimentation. Mar Biol 142:1065–1071Google Scholar
  9. Connell SD (2003b) Negative effects overpower the positive of kelp to exclude invertebrates from the understorey community. Oecologia (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Cowen RK, Agegian CR, Foster MS (1982) The maintenance of community structure in a central California giant kelp forest. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 64:189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dayton PK, Currie V, Gerrodette T, Keller BD, Rosenthal R, Ven Tresca D (1984) Patch dynamics and stability of some California kelp communities. Ecol Monogr 54:253–289Google Scholar
  12. Dayton PK, Tegner MJ, Parnell PE, Edwards PB (1992) Temporal and spatial patterns of disturbance and recovery in kelp forest community. Ecol Monogr 62:421–445Google Scholar
  13. Doty MS (1971) Measurement of water movement in reference to benthic algal growth. Bot Mar XIV:32–35Google Scholar
  14. Fletcher WJ, Day RW (1983) The distribution of epifauna on Ecklonia radiata (C. Agardh) J. Agardh and the effect of disturbance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 71:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franklin LA, Badger MR (2001) A comparison of photosynthetic electron transport rates in macroalgae measured by pulse amplitude modulated chlorophyll fluorometry and mass spectrometry. J Phycol 37:756–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gagnon P, Himmelman JH, Johnson LE (2003) Algal colonization in urchin barrens: defense by association during recruitment of the brown alga Agarum cribrosum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 290:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gantt E (1990) Pigmentation and photoacclimation. In: Cole KM, Sheath RG (eds) Biology of red algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 203–219Google Scholar
  18. Hader DP, Porst M, Lebert M (2001) Photoinhibition in common Atlantic macroalgae measured on site in Gran Canaria. Helgol Mar Res 55:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins SJ, Harkin E (1985) Preliminary canopy removal experiments in algal dominated communities low on the shore and in the shallow subtidal on the Isle of Man. Bot Mar XXVIII:223–230Google Scholar
  20. Heine JN (1983) Seasonal productivity of two red algae in a central California kelp forest. J Phycol 19:146–152Google Scholar
  21. Huisman JM (2000) Marine plants of Australia. University of Western Australia Press, PerthGoogle Scholar
  22. Huisman JM, Walker DI (1990) A catalogue of marine plants of Rottnest Island, Western Australia, with notes on their distribution and biogeography. Kingia 1:349–459Google Scholar
  23. Irving AD, Connell SD (2003) Sedimentation and light penetration interact to maintain heterogeneity of subtidal habitats: algal vs invertebrate dominated assemblages. Phycologia (in press)Google Scholar
  24. Jassby AD, Platt T (1976) Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 21:540–547Google Scholar
  25. Kendrick GA, Lavery PS , Phillips JC (1999) Influence of Ecklonia radiata kelp canopy on structure of macro-algal assemblages in Marmion Lagoon, Western Australia. Hydrobiologia 399:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kendrick GA, Harvey E, Wernberg T, Harman N, Goldberg N (2003) The role of disturbance in maintaining diversity of benthic macroalgal assemblages in southern Australia. Jpn J Phycol (Sorui) [Suppl] (in press)Google Scholar
  27. Kennelly SJ (1987a) Physical disturbances in an Australian kelp community. I. Temporal effects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:145–153Google Scholar
  28. Kennelly SJ (1987b) Physical disturbance in an Australian kelp community. II. Effects on understorey species due to differences in kelp cover. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:155–165Google Scholar
  29. Kennelly SJ (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understory species due to shade and scour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50:215–224Google Scholar
  30. Kennelly SJ (1994) Kelp beds. In: Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (eds) Coastal marine ecology of temperate Australia. New South Wales University Press, Kensington, pp 106–120Google Scholar
  31. Kiirikki M (1996) Experimental evidence that Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyta) controls filamentous algae by means of the whiplash effect. Eur J Phycol 31:61–66Google Scholar
  32. King RJ, Schramm W (1976) Photosynthetic rates of benthic marine algae in relation to light intensity and seasonal variations. Mar Biol 37:215–222Google Scholar
  33. Kirkman H (1981) The first year in the life history and the survival of juvenile marine macrophyte, Ecklonia radiata (Turn.) J. Agardh. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 55:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirkman H (1984) Standing stock and production of Ecklonia radiata (C. Ag.) J. Agardh. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 76:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirkman H (1985) Growth, density and biomass of Ecklonia radiata at different depths and growth under artificial shading off Perth, Western Australia. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 40:169–197Google Scholar
  36. Konar B (2000) Seasonal inhibitory effects of marine plants on sea urchins: structuring communities the algal way. Oecologia 125:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Konar B, Estes JA (2003) The stability of boundary regions between kelp beds and deforested areas. Ecology 84:174–185Google Scholar
  38. Kuhl M, Glud RN, Borum J, Roberts R, Rysgaard S (2001) Photosynthetic performance of surface-associated algae below sea ice as measured with a pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) fluorometer and O2 microsensors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 223:1–14Google Scholar
  39. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Markager S, Sand-Jensen K (1994) The physiology and ecology of light-growth relationship in macroalgae. In: Round FE, Chapman DJ (eds) Progress in phycological research, vol 10. Biopress, Bristol, pp 210–298Google Scholar
  41. May V, Larkum AWD (1981) A subtidal transect in Jervis Bay, New South Wales. Aust J Ecol 6:439–457Google Scholar
  42. Melville AJ, Connell SD (2001) Experimental effects of kelp canopies on subtidal coralline algae. Aust Ecol 26:102–108Google Scholar
  43. Mishkind M, Manuzerall D (1980) Kinetic evidence for a common photosynthetic step in diverse seaweeds. Mar Biol 56:261–265Google Scholar
  44. Muus BJ (1968) A field method for measuring “exposure” by means of plaster balls. A preliminary account. Sarsia 34:61–68Google Scholar
  45. Novaczek I (1981) Stipe growth rings in Ecklonia radiata (C.A.G.) J.A.G. (Laminariales). Br Phycol J 16:363–371Google Scholar
  46. Pearse JS, Hines AH (1979) Expansion of central California kelp forest following the mass mortality of sea urchins. Mar Biol 51:83–91Google Scholar
  47. Phillips JC, Kendrick GA, Lavery PS (1997) A test of the functional group approach to detecting shifts in macroalgal communities along a disturbance gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 153:125–138Google Scholar
  48. Ramus J (1981) The capture and transduction of light energy. In: Lobban CS, Wynne MJ (eds) The biology of seaweeds. Blackwell, Berkeley, pp 458–492Google Scholar
  49. Ramus J, Beale SI, Mauzerall D, Howard KL (1976) Changes in photosynthetic pigment concentration in seaweeds as a function of water depth. Mar Biol 37:223–229Google Scholar
  50. Ramus J, Lemons F, Zimmerman C (1977) Adaptation of light-harvesting pigments to downwelling light and the consequent photosynthetic performance of the eulittoral rockweeds Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus. Mar Biol 42:293–303Google Scholar
  51. Raner K (1996) MacCurveFit, version 1.2.2. http://www.krs.com.au/mcf.html. Cited 21 March 2003
  52. Rapp de Eston V, Bussab WO (1990) An experimental analysis of ecological dominance in a rocky subtidal macroalgal community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 136:170–195Google Scholar
  53. Reed MS, Foster DC (1984) The effects of canopy shading on algae recruitment and growth in a giant kelp forest. Ecology 65:937–948Google Scholar
  54. Sagert S, Forster RM, Feuerpfeil P, Schubert H (1997) Daily course of photosynthesis and photoinhibition in Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta) from different shore levels. Eur J Phycol 32:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sand-Jensen K (1988) Photosynthetic responses of Ulva lactuca at very low light. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50:195–201Google Scholar
  56. Searle DJ, Semeniuk V (1985) The natural sectors of the inner Rottnest Shelf coast adjoining the Swan Coastal Plain. J R Soc West Aust 67:116–136Google Scholar
  57. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Velimirov B, Griffiths CL (1979) Wave-induced kelp movement and its importance for community structure. Bot Mar XXII:169–172Google Scholar
  59. Watanabe JM, Phillips RE, Allen NH, Anderson WA (1992) Physiological response of stipitate understory kelp, Pterygophora californica Ruprecht, to shading by giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera C. Agardh. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 159:237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wernberg T, Coleman M, Firhead A, Miller S, Thomsen M (2003a) Morphology of Ecklonia radiata (Phaeophyta: Laminarales) along its geographic distribution in south-western Australia and Australasia. Mar Biol 143:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wernberg T, Kendrick GA, Phillips JC (2003b) Regional differences in kelp-associated algal assemblages on temperate limestone reefs in southern Australia. Divers Distrib 9:427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wernberg-Moller T (2002) Influence of the canopy-forming kelp Ecklonia radiata (C. Ag.) J. Agardh on associated macroalgal assemblages in southwestern Australia. PhD thesis, School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  63. Womersley HBS (1984) The marine flora of southern Australia, part I. South Australian Government Printing Division, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  64. Womersley HBS (1987) The marine flora of southern Australia, part II. South Australian Government Printing Division, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  65. Womersley HBS (1994) The marine flora of southern Australia, part III. Australian Biological Resource Study, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  66. Womersley HBS (1996) The marine flora of southern Australia, part IIIB. Australian Biological Resource Study, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  67. Womersley HBS (1998) The marine flora of southern Australia, part IIIC. State Herbarium of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood WF (1987) The influence of light and canopy structure on the growth of the kelp Ecklonia radiata. PhD thesis, Department of Botany, The University of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  69. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Toohey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gary A. Kendrick
    • 1
  • Thomas Wernberg
    • 1
  • Julia C. Phillips
    • 2
  • Sairah Malkin
    • 1
  • Jane Prince
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Plant BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Marine ResearchWembleyAustralia
  3. 3.School of Animal BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations