Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 143, Issue 4, pp 811–815 | Cite as

Mortality is associated with social rank in the clown anemonefish (Amphiprion percula)

  • P. M. BustonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Elucidating the causes of post-recruitment mortality is a vital step toward understanding the population dynamics of coral reef fishes. Predation is often considered to be the primary proximate cause of mortality. It has, however, proven difficult to discern the relative contributions of predation and other processes, such as competition for food, shelter, or mates, to patterns of mortality. To determine which other processes might be important drivers of mortality patterns, factors related to mortality in the clown anemonefish Amphiprion percula (Lacepède, 1802) were examined. Patterns of mortality will not be driven by predation in A. percula, because these fish are well protected from predators by their close association with sea anemones. Mortality rates were based on the disappearance of known individuals from a population of 201, in 57 groups, during a 1-year field study (in 1997), in Madang Lagoon, Papua New Guinea. Mortality rate of A. percula was low (14% per annum) compared to other coral reef fish, probably due to the protection from predators afforded by the anemone. Six factors (reef, depth, anemone diameter, number of individuals, density, and standard length) showed no association with the probability of mortality (P>0.05). Rank was the only factor associated with the probability of mortality (P<0.03); low-rank individuals (ranks 4–6) suffered a higher mortality rate than high-rank individuals (ranks 1–3) (P<0.01). The most likely explanation for this pattern was that competition for rank, amongst individuals within an anemone, resulted in some individuals evicting their subordinates. Individuals probably competed for rank because it conferred access to reproduction, and not because it conferred access to food or shelter. Such competition for reproduction will be intense whenever some individuals obtain a greater share of reproduction than others do, and it may be an important process influencing the dynamics of coral reef fish populations.

Keywords

Standard Length Reef Fish Dominance Hierarchy Coral Reef Fish Rank Individual 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank my Ph.D. advisors, S. Emlen, P. Sherman, K. Reeve, A. McCune, and A. Bass for incredible support; two anonymous referees, R. Safran, M. Shulman, J. von Fischer, C. Webb, and Cornell's "Behavior Lunch Bunch" for helpful comments and discussion; J. Mizeu, M. Black, C. Norris, M. Moore, and the staffs of the Christensen Research Institute and the Jais Aben Resort for their assistance in Papua New Guinea; the landowners of Riwo Village, the Madang Provincial Government, and Papua New Guinea Government for permitting my fieldwork. Supported by D. Christensen and the Christensen Fund, a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (IBN-9623224), the Andrew W. Mellon Fund of the Cornell College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the Cornell and National Chapters of Sigma Xi, the International Women's Fishing Association, and the Cornell University Department of Neurobiology and Behavior. This work comprises a portion of P.B.'s doctoral thesis requirements (Cornell University).

References

  1. Aldenhoven JM (1986) Local variation in mortality rates and life-expectancy estimates of the coral reef fish Centropyge bicolor (Pisces: Pomacanthidae). Mar Biol 92:237–244Google Scholar
  2. Allen GR (1972) The anemonefishes: their classification and biology, 2nd edn. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, N.J.Google Scholar
  3. Beukers JS, Jones GP (1997) Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef population. Oecologia 114:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth DJ (1995) Juvenile groups in a coral-reef damselfish: density-dependent effects on individual fitness and population demography. Ecology 76:91–106Google Scholar
  5. Buston PM (2002) Group structure of the clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
  6. Buston PM (2003) Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish. Behav Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Caillet GM, Love MS, Ebeling AW (1986) Fishes: a field and laboratory manual on the structure, identification, and natural history. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
  8. Caley MJ, Carr MH, Hixon MA, Hughes TP, Jones GP, Menge BA (1996) Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:477–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell SD (1996) Variations in mortality of a coral reef fish: links with predator abundance. Mar Biol 126:347–352Google Scholar
  10. Eckert GJ (1987) Estimates of adult and juvenile mortality for labrid fishes at One Tree Reef, Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 95:161–171Google Scholar
  11. Elliott JK, Mariscal RN (2001) Coexistence of nine anemonefish species: differential host and habitat utilization, size and recruitment. Mar Biol 138:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott JK, Elliott JM, Mariscal RN (1995) Host selection, location, and association behaviors of anemonefishes in field settlement experiments. Mar Biol 122:377–389Google Scholar
  13. Fautin DG (1992) Anemonefish recruitment: the roles of order and chance. Symbiosis 14:143–160Google Scholar
  14. Fautin DG, Allen GR (1992) Field guide to anemonefishes and their host sea anemones. Western Australian Museum, PerthGoogle Scholar
  15. Forrester GE (1990) Factors influencing the juvenile demography of a coral reef fish. Ecology 71:1666–1681Google Scholar
  16. Forrester GE (1995) Strong density-dependent survival and recruitment regulate the abundance of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 103:275–282Google Scholar
  17. Fricke HW (1979) Mating system, resource defense and sex change in the anemonefish Amphiprion akallopisos. Z Tierpsychol 50:313–326Google Scholar
  18. Hixon MA (1991) Predation as a process structuring coral reef fish communities. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
  19. Hixon MA (1998) Population dynamics of coral-reef fishes: controversial concepts and hypotheses. Aust J Ecol 23:192–201Google Scholar
  20. Hixon MA, Beets JP (1993) Predation, prey refuges, and the structure of coral reef fish assemblages. Ecol Monogr 63:77–101Google Scholar
  21. Hixon MA, Carr MH (1997) Synergistic predation, density dependence, and population regulation in marine fish. Science 227:946–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jebb MHP, Lowry JK (1995) Natural history of Madang Lagoon with an appendix of collecting localities. Rec Aust Mus Suppl 22:1–24Google Scholar
  23. Jones GP (1986) Food availability affects growth in a coral reef fish. Oecologia 70:136–139Google Scholar
  24. Jones GP (1988) Experimental evaluation of the effects of habitat structure and competitive interactions on the juveniles of two coral reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 123:115–126Google Scholar
  25. Jones GP (1991) Postrecruitment processes in the ecology of coral reef fish populations: a multifactorial perspective. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar
  26. Mariscal RN (1970) The nature of the symbiosis between Indo-Pacific anemonefishes and sea anemones. Mar Biol 6:58–65Google Scholar
  27. Munro JL, Williams DM (1985) Assessment and management of coral reef fisheries: biological, environmental and socioeconomic aspects. In: Gabrié C, et al (eds) Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Congr, vol 4. Antenne Museum—EPHE, Moorea, French Polynesia, pp 545–581Google Scholar
  28. Nelson JS, Chou LM, Phang Violet PE (1994) Pigmentation variation in the anemonefish Amphiprion ocellaris (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): type, stability and its usefulness for individual identification. Raffles Bull Zool 42:927–930Google Scholar
  29. Ochi H (1985) Temporal patterns of breeding and larval settlement in a temperate population of the tropical anemonefish, Amphiprion clarkii. Jpn J Ichthyol 32:248–256Google Scholar
  30. Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (1999) Mortality of juvenile damselfish: implications for assessing processes that determine abundance. Ecology 80:35–50Google Scholar
  31. Shima JS (2001) Regulation of local populations of coral reef fish via joint effects of density- and number-dependent mortality. Oecologia 126:58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steele MA (1997) Population regulation by post-settlement mortality in two temperate reef fishes. Oecologia 112:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sweatman HPA (1983) Influence of conspecifics on choice of settlement sites by larvae of two pomacentrid fishes (Dascyllus aruanus and D. reticulatus) on coral reefs. Mar Biol 75:225–230Google Scholar
  35. Tupper M, Boutilier RG (1995) Effects of conspecific density on settlement, growth and post-settlement survival of a temperate reef fish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 191:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warner RR, Hughes TP (1988) The population dynamics of reef fishes. In: Choat JH, et al (eds) Proc 6th Int Coral Reef Symp, vol 2. Symposium Executive Committee, Townsville, pp 149–155Google Scholar
  37. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurobiology and BehaviorCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.National Center for Ecological Analysis and SynthesisUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations