Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 143, Issue 1, pp 47–55 | Cite as

Morphology of Ecklonia radiata (Phaeophyta: Laminarales) along its geographic distribution in south-western Australia and Australasia

  • T. WernbergEmail author
  • M. Coleman
  • A. Fairhead
  • S. Miller
  • M. Thomsen
Article

Abstract

Ecklonia radiata (C. Ag.) J. Agardh is a common macroalga on reefs in the warm-temperate parts of the southern hemisphere. It is a dominant habitat-former and as such has a strong structuring effect on associated algal assemblages. Morphological variation in E. radiata potentially affects its interactions with the surroundings and contributes to confusion about its taxonomy. We quantified the magnitude of morphological variation in fully developed E. radiata sporophytes across Australasia and tested the hypotheses that E. radiata has different morphology at different locations and that the degree of morphological difference depends on spatial distances among locations. A total of 11 morphological characters were sampled from 11 locations along the Australian coastline from Kalbarri in Western Australia to Sydney in New South Wales as well as from Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Most morphological characters varied considerably from one location to another. For example, the average (±SE) thallus length was 135.2±12.5 cm in Kalbarri and only 69.7±5.5 cm in Sydney. There were no consistent spatial patterns of variation among individual morphological characters, and, generally, variations among individual characters were poorly correlated (−0.5<R<0.5). This suggests that individual morphological characters develop independently of each other in response to processes operating at different spatial scales. Multivariate measures of morphology were found to be different among some locations and similar among others (−0.37≤Clarke's R≤1), but there was no correlation (Spearman's R=0.08) between morphological similarity and distance between locations. Consequently, our results do not support clinal variation in E. radiata morphology. Rather, they suggest the presence of discrete morphologically different populations, in which the morphology at any one location reflects multiple forcing factors operating on different morphological characters at different spatial scales.

Keywords

Macroalgae Morphological Character Grazing Pressure Lateral Spinousity Wave Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to S.D. Connell for sharing information on unpublished data. G.A. Kendrick and M.A. Vanderklift provided useful critique and comments on various stages of this work. Also thanks to the many respondents from the ALGAL-L email list who showed interest in the subject and offered comments and suggestions. This work was supported by grants from the Danish Natural Science Research Council and the Danish Research Academy to T. Wernberg.

References

  1. Andrew NL, Jones GP (1994) Patch formation by herbivorous fish in a temperate Australian kelp forest. Oecologia 85:57–68Google Scholar
  2. Bell EC, Denny MW (1994) Quantifying 'wave exposure': a simple device for recording maximum velocity and results of its use at several field sites. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 181:9–29Google Scholar
  3. Blanchette CA (1997) Size and survival of intertidal plants in response to wave action—a case study with Fucus gardneri. Ecology 78:1563–1578Google Scholar
  4. Bolton JJ, Anderson RJ (1994) Ecklonia. In: Akatsuka I (ed) Biology of economic algae. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 385–406Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter RC, Williams SL (1993) Effects of algal turf canopy height and microscale substratum topography on profiles of flow speed in a coral fore-reef environment. Limnol Oceanogr 38:687–694Google Scholar
  6. Choat JH, Schiel DR (1982) Patterns of distribution and abundance of large brown algae and invertebrate herbivores in subtidal regions of northern New Zealand. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 60:129–162Google Scholar
  7. Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) Primer v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole RG, Syms C (1999) Using spatial pattern analysis to distinguish causes of mortality: an example from kelp in north-eastern New Zealand. J Ecol 87:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Critchley AT, De Visscher PRM, Nienhuis PH (1990) Canopy characteristics of the brown alga Sargassum muticum (Fucales, Phaeophyta) in Lake Grevelingen, southwest Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 204/205:211–217Google Scholar
  10. Dayton PK, Currie V, Gerrodette T, Keller BD, Rosenthal R, Ven Tresca D (1984) Patch dynamics and stability of some California kelp communities. Ecol Monogr 54:253–290Google Scholar
  11. Eckman JE, Duggins DO, Sewell AT (1989) Ecology of understory kelp environments. I. Effects of kelps on flow and particle transport near the bottom. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 129:173–188Google Scholar
  12. Field JG, Jarman NG, Diekman GS, Griffiths CL, Velimirov B, Zoutendyk P (1980) Sun, waves, seaweed and lobsters: the dynamics of a west coast kelp-bed. S Afr J Sci 73Google Scholar
  13. Fowler-Walker MJ, Connell SD (2002) Opposing states of subtidal habitat across temperate Australia: consistency and predictability in kelp canopy–benthic associations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:49–56Google Scholar
  14. Gaylord B (1999) Detailing agents of physical disturbance: wave-induced velocities and accelerations on a rocky shore. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 239:85–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerard VA, Mann KH (1979) Growth and production of Laminaria longicruris (Phaeophyta) populations exposed to different intensities of water movement. J Phycol 15:38–41Google Scholar
  16. Graham MH, Edwards MS (2001) Statistical significance versus fit: estimating the importance of individual factors in ecological analysis of variance. Oikos 93:505–513Google Scholar
  17. Huisman JM (2000) Marine plants of Australia. University of Western Australia Press, PerthGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurd CL (2000) Water motion, marine macroalgal physiology, and production. J Phycol 36:453–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hymanson ZP, Reed DC, Foster MS, Carter JW (1990) The validity of using morphological characteristics as predictors of age in the kelp Pterygophora californica (Laminariales: Phaeophyta). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 59:295–304Google Scholar
  20. Jackelman JJ, Bolton JJ (1990) Form variation and productivity of an intertidal foliose Gigartina species (Rhodophyta) in relation to wave exposure. Hydrobiologia 204/205:57–64Google Scholar
  21. Kalvas A, Kautsky L (1993) Geographical variation in Fucus vesiculosus morphology in the Baltic and North Seas. Eur J Phycol 28:85–91Google Scholar
  22. Kalvas A, Kautsky L (1998) Morphological variation in Fucus vesiculosus populations along temperature and salinity gradients in Iceland. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78:985–1001Google Scholar
  23. Kendrick GA, Lavery PS, Philips JC (1999) Influence of Ecklonia radiata kelp canopy structure on macroalgal assemblages in Marmion Lagoon, Western Australia. Hydrobiologia 399:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennelly SJ (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understorey species due to shade and scour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50:215–224Google Scholar
  25. Kennelly SJ, Underwood AJ (1992) Fluctuations in the distributions and abundances of species in sublittoral kelp forest in New South Wales. Aust J Ecol 17:367–382Google Scholar
  26. Kirkman H (1981) The first year in the life history and the survival of the juvenile marine macrophyte, Ecklonia radiata (Turn.) J. Agardh. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 55:243–254Google Scholar
  27. Kusumo HT, Druehl LD (2000) Variability over space and time in the genetic structure of the winged kelp Alaria marginata. Mar Biol 136:397–409Google Scholar
  28. Larkum AWD (1986) A study of growth and primary production in Ecklonia radiata Laminariales at a sheltered site in Port Jackson New South Wales, Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 96:177–190Google Scholar
  29. Melville AJ, Connell SD (2001) Experimental effects of kelp canopies on subtidal coralline algae. Aust Ecol 26:102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Molloy FJ, Bolton JJ (1996) The effects of wave exposure and depth on the morphology of inshore populations of the Namibian kelp, Laminaria schinzii Foslie. Bot Mar 39:525–531Google Scholar
  31. Novaczek I (1981) Stipe growth rings in Ecklonia radiata (C. Ag.) J. Ag. (Laminarales). Br Phycol J 16:363–371Google Scholar
  32. Novaczek I (1984) Development and phenology of Ecklonia radiata at two depths in Goat Island Bay, New Zealand. Mar Biol 81:189–197Google Scholar
  33. Phillips JC, Kendrick GA, Lavery PS (1997) A test of a functional group approach to detecting shifts in macroalgal communities along a disturbance gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 153:125–138Google Scholar
  34. Ralph PJ, Morrison DA, Addison A (1998) A quantitative study of the patterns of morphological variation within Hormosira banksii (Turner) Decaisne (Fucales: Phaeophyta) in south-eastern Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 225:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rice EL, Kenchington TJ (1990) Spatial variation patterns in the marine macroalga Xiphophora gladiata ssp. gladiata (Pheophyta). II. Morphological variation over large spatial scales. J Phycol 26:522–534Google Scholar
  36. Rice EL, Kenchington TJ, Chapman ARO (1985) Intraspecific geographic-morphological variation patterns in Fucus distichus and Fucus evanescens. Mar Biol 88:207–215Google Scholar
  37. Russell G (1986) Variation and natural selection in marine macroalgae. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 24:309–377Google Scholar
  38. Scott GW, Hull SL, Hornby SE, Hardy FG, Owens NJP (2001) Phenotypic variation in Fucus spiralis (Phaeophyceae): morphology, chemical phenotype and their relationship to the environment. Eur J Phycol 36:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sjøtun K, Fredriksen S (1995) Growth allocation in Laminaria hyperborea (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) in relation to age and wave exposure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 126:213–222Google Scholar
  40. Sjøtun K, Fredriksen S, Lein TE, Rueness J, Sivertsen K (1993) Population studies of Laminaria hyperborea from its northern range of distribution in Norway. Hydrobiologia 261:215–221Google Scholar
  41. Steinberg PD (1995) Interaction between the canopy dwelling echinoid Holopheustes purpurescens and its host kelp Ecklonia radiata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 127:169–181Google Scholar
  42. Steinberg PD, Kendrick GA (1999) Kelp forests. In: Andrew N (ed) Under southern seas. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, pp 60–71Google Scholar
  43. Vanderklift MA (2002) Interactions between sea urchins and macroalgae in south-western Australia: testing general predictions in a local context. PhD thesis, Department of Botany, The University of Western Australia, PerthGoogle Scholar
  44. Velimirov B, Griffiths CL (1979) Wave-induced kelp movement and its importance for community structure. Bot Mar 22:169–172Google Scholar
  45. Wernberg T, Thomsen MS, Staehr PA, Pedersen MF (2001) Comparative phenology of Sargassum muticum and Halidrys siliquosa (Phaeophyceae: Fucales) in Limfjorden, Denmark. Bot Mar 44:31–39Google Scholar
  46. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM (1991) Statistical principles in experimental design, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Womersley HBS (1987) The marine flora of southern Australia, part II. South Australian Government Printing Division, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  48. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Wernberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Coleman
    • 2
  • A. Fairhead
    • 3
  • S. Miller
    • 4
  • M. Thomsen
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Plant BiologyUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal CitiesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Environmental BiologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  4. 4.Department of BotanyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  5. 5.Department of Environmental ScienceUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations