Skip to main content

Comparison of fracture morphologies of ring shake surface and shear surface in Dahurian larch

Abstract

To understand the mechanism of ring shakes in Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii), the ring shake surface on the tangential section was observed and compared with the shear surface of green and air-dry wood. Macroscopically, the ring shakes occurred in the heartwood between the 20th and 40th growth ring. The ring shake surface exhibited an even and clean structure without the fluff. The shear surface of the green wood showed a larger amount of fluff compared to that of air-dry wood. In microscopy, ring shake failure occurred at the end of the latewood and/or the beginning of earlywood or within the earlywood zone. The ring shake surface was covered with a resinous substance, and the wood cells were observed after removing the resinous substance with ethanol. The tracheid walls in the ring shake and shear surface of green wood primarily exhibited intercell failure and rarely intrawall and transwall failures. In air-dry wood, the tracheid walls in the shear surface mostly exhibited intrawall and transwall failures. In the ring shake surface, there was hardly any failure in the epithelial and ray cells, thereby showing a distinct difference compared to the shear surface of the green and air-dry woods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Bergstedt A, Lyck C (2007) Larch wood – a literature review. Forest & landscape Working Paper no. 2003–2007. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen. www.sl.kvl.dk/upload/workingpapersno23.pdf

  2. Betts HS (1945) Western larch (Larix occidentalis). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service

  3. Birbilis D, Kakavas K, Chavenetidou M (2018) Ring shake occurrence related to growth parameters and prediction model for its presence before felling. Eur J Wood Prod 76(4):1353–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-017-1258-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JP, Sendak PE (2006) Association of ring shake in eastern hemlock with tree attributes. For Prod J 56(10):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  5. Côté WA, Hanna RB (1983) Ultrastructural characteristics of wood fracture surfaces. Wood Fiber Sci 15(2):135–163

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fonti P, Frey B (2002) Is ray volume a possible factor influencing ring shake occurrence in chestnut wood? Trees 16(8):519–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0193-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fonti P, Macchioni N (2003) Ring shake in chestnut: anatomical description, extent and frequency of failures. Ann for Sci 60(5):403–408. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fonti P, Sell J (2003) Radial split resistance of chestnut earlywood and its relation to ring width. Wood Fiber Sci 35(2):201–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonti P, Macchioni N, Thibaut B (2002) Ring shake in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.): state of the art. Ann Forest Sci 59(2):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gindl W, Teischinger AA (2003) Comparison of the TL-shear strength of normal and compression wood of European larch. Holzforschung 57(4):421–426. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2003.062

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Han Y, Kim MJ, Lee HM, Kang JT, Eom CD (2017) Comparison of cellular anatomical, physical and mechanical properties between Dahurian larch and Japanese larch. J Korean Wood Sci Tech 45(5):525–534

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harrar ES (1954) Defects in hardwood veneer logs: their frequency and importance (Station Paper No. 039). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service

  13. Jorgensen RN, Lecznar SL (1964) Anatomy of hemlock ring shake associated with sapsucker injury (Paper No. 021). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service

  14. Kakavas K, Chavenetidou M, Birbilis D (2018) Effect of ring shakes on mechanical properties of chestnut wood from a Greek coppice forest. For Chron 94(1):61–67. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2018-008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kean W, Xun S (1994) Larch and white birch growth stresses’ experimental investigation and analysis. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 5(1):45–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02875044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kifetew G, Thuvander F, Berglund L, Lindberg H (1998) The effect of drying on wood fracture surfaces from specimens loaded in wet condition. Wood Sci Technol 32(2):83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00702589

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim NH, Okano T, Ohta M (1988) Fractography of drying checks. Bulletin of the Tokyo University Forests 78:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Kim DH, Jo JI, Kim JH, Lee SH, Choi JK, Kim NH (2021) A comparative study on the physical and mechanical properties of Dahurian larch and Japanese larch grown in Korea. Wood Res 66(2):415–426. https://doi.org/10.37763/wr.1336-4561/66.3.415426

  19. KS F 2209 (2004) Method of shear test for wood. Korean Standards Association, Seoul, Korea

  20. Kwon SM, Kwon GJ, Jang JH, Kim NH (2011) Fractography of sound and tension woods of Quercus mongolica by shear and bending stress. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 39(4):351–358. https://doi.org/10.5658/wood.2011.39.4.351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Macchioni N, Pividori M (1996) Ring shake and structural characteristics of a chestnut (Castanea sativa Miller) coppice stand in northern Piedmont (northwest Italy). Ann Sci for. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19960103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Müller U, Sretenovic A, Gindl W, Grabner M, Wimmer R, Teischinger A (2004) Effect of macro-and micro-structural variability on the shear behavior of softwood. IAWA J 25(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Panshin AJ, Zeeuw C (1980) Textbook of wood technology. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richter C (2015) Wood Characteristics: description, causes, prevention, impact on use and technological adaptation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07422-1-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Romagnoli M, Spina S (2013) Physical and mechanical wood properties of ring-shaken chestnut (Castanea sativa) trees. Can J for Res 43(2):200–207. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2012-0357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Savill PS (1986) Anatomical characters in the wood of oak (Quercus robur L. and Q petraea Liebl.) which predispose trees to shake. The Commonwealth Forestry Rev 65(2):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shigo AL (1963) Ring shake associated with sapsucker injury. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service

  28. Spina S, Romagnoli M (2010) Characterization of ring shake defect in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) wood in the Lazio Region (Italy). Forestry 83(3):315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi M, Kawaguchi N, Miyano H, Hasegawa M (1983) The properties of eight wood species imported from USSR [Larix Gmelini, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus koraiensis, Populus sp., Tilia sp., Betula sp., Ulmus sp., Fraxinus sp.]. J Hokkaido Forest Prod Res Institute 377:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tan DM, Stanzl-Tschegg SE, Tschegg EK (1995) Models of wood fracture in Mode I and Mode II. Holz Roh- Werkst 53(3):159–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02716417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilkes J (1986) Anatomy of zones of ring shake in Eucalyptus maculate. IAWA J 7(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilkes J (1987) Effect of moisture content on the morphology of longitudinal fracture in Eucalyptus maculate. IAWA J 8(2):175–181. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-900001044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zink AG, Pelikane PJ, Shuler CE (1994) Ultrastructural analysis of softwood fracture surfaces. Wood Sci Technol 28(5):329–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledegements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Education (Grant No. NRF-2016R1D1A1B01008339 and NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025582), and the Science and Technology Support Program through the NRF, funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (Grant No. NRF-2019K1A3A9A01000018).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nam Hun Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.H., Purusatama, B.D., Kim, J.H. et al. Comparison of fracture morphologies of ring shake surface and shear surface in Dahurian larch. Wood Sci Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-021-01324-3

Download citation