Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The toughness contribution of bamboo node to the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of bamboo

  • Original
  • Published:
Wood Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bamboo is a kind of biological composite reinforced by unidirectional long fibers. The cleavage strength along grain of bamboo internode is low; however, the existence of bamboo node can hinder the propagation of interlaminar crack to make up for the defect of weak opening mode fracture toughness along interlamination. In this article, the double cantilever beam method was applied to test the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of Moso bamboo internode specimens and specimens with node to study the difference of the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness between Moso bamboo internode specimens and specimens with node. The results are shown as follows: the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of Moso bamboo internode specimens was \( G_{{{\text{I}}C}}^{\text{Internode}} \) = 498 J/m2 (SD = 65 J/m2); the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of Moso bamboo specimens with node was \( G_{{{\text{I}}C}}^{\text{Node}}\) = 1,431 J/m2 (SD = 198 J/m2). It can be seen that the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of bamboo specimens with node was higher than that of bamboo internode specimens, and the toughness contribution of node to bamboo Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness was 1.87 times. The conclusion was drawn that bamboo node can contribute a lot to hinder the interlaminar fracture of bamboo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Ahmad M, Kamke FA (2005) Analysis of Calcutta bamboo for structural composite materials: physical and mechanical properties. Wood Sci Technol 39(6):448–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D 5528-01 (2001) Standard test method for Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society of Testing Materials Philadelphia, PA

  • Barati E, Alizadeh Y (2012) A notch root radius to attain minimum fracture loads in plates weakened by U-notches under Mode I loading. Scientia Iranica 19(3):491–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compston P, Jar PYB, Burchill PJ, Takahashi K (2001) The effect of matrix toughness and loading rate on the Mode-II interlaminar fracture toughness of glass fibre/vinyl ester composites. Comp Sci Technol 61:321–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson JM (2000) Mechanical testing of advanced fibre composites. Wood head Publishing and CRC Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Peng Z (2007) Bamboo and Rattan in the World. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, pp 127–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoshravan M, Asgari Mehrabadi F (2012) Fracture analysis in adhesive composite material/aluminum joints under Mode-I loading; experimental and numerical approaches. Int J Adhesion Adhesives 39:8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obataya E, Kitin P, Yamauchi H (2007) Bending characteristics of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens)with respect to its fiber–foam composite structure. Wood Sci Technol 41:385–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao Z, Huang S, Wu F, Zhou L, Clement A (2008) A study on the difference of structure and strength between internodes and nodes of bamboo. J Bamboo Res 27(2):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao ZP, Fang C-H, Tian GL (2009) Mode I interlaminar fracture property of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens). Wood Sci Technol 43:527–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao ZP, Zhou L, Liu YM, Arnaud C (2010) Differences in structure and strength between internode and node section of bamboo. J Trop For Sci 22(2):133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZQ (1993) Wood science, vol 9. Forest Publishing Company of China, Beijing, pp 282–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigeyasu A, Sun U (2001) Fracture properties of bamboo. Compos Part B Eng 32(5):451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triboulot P, Jodin P, Pluvinage G (1984) Validity of fracture mechanics concept applied to wood by finite element calculation. Wood Sci Technol 18(6):448–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Wang G-F, Guo X-F, Zhang M (2004) Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of stitched laminates. J Inorg Mater 19(5):1123–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Jiao G (1996) The size effects of crack in DCB test of composite materials. J Aeronaut Mater 16(4):46–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng QY, Li SH, Bao XR (1992) Effect of bamboo nodal on mechanical properties of bamboo wood. (in Chinese). Sci Silvae Sin 28(3):247–252

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11008250).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuoping Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, F., Shao, Z., Wu, Y. et al. The toughness contribution of bamboo node to the Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of bamboo. Wood Sci Technol 48, 1257–1268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0591-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0591-2

Keywords