Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Response to the comment on: Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Van Heghe A, Mordant G, Dupont J, Dejaeger M, Laurent MR, Gielen E (2021) Effects of orthogeriatric care models on outcomes of hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Calcif Tissue Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00913-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH (2017) Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev 6(1):245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillikin D (2011) NLM gateway transitioning to new pilot project site. NLM Tech Bull 2011(380):e9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT (2020) Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res 7(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):1–173. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta7270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. EUnetHTA (European Network for Health Technology Assessment) (2015) Internal validity of non-randomised studies (NRS) on interventions 2015. Accessed https://www.eunethta.eu/internal-validity-of-non-randomised-studies-nrs-on-interventions-guideline-final-jul-2015/

  7. Sterne J, Hernán M, McAleenan A, Reeves B, Higgins J (2021) Chapter 25: assessing risk of bias in a non-randomized study. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 62 (updated February 2021). Cochrane, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, Rücke G (2015) Meta-analysis with R. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Gilles Mordant

  2. Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Jolan Dupont, Marian Dejaeger & Evelien Gielen

  3. Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Jolan Dupont, Marian Dejaeger, Michaël R. Laurent & Evelien Gielen

  4. Department of Geriatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Jolan Dupont, Marian Dejaeger & Evelien Gielen

  5. Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Annelore Van Heghe

  6. Geriatrics Department, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium

    Michaël R. Laurent

Authors
  1. Gilles Mordant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jolan Dupont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annelore Van Heghe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marian Dejaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michaël R. Laurent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Evelien Gielen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have participated in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have given final approval of the version to be submitted and any revised version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelien Gielen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EG and MRL are board members of the Belgian Bone Club. EG has received consultancy and lectures fees from Alexion, Amgen, Sandoz, Takeda, and UCB, unrelated to this work. MRL is a geriatrician leading an orthogeriatric unit and has received consultancy and lecture fees from Alexion, Amgen, Kyowa Kirin, UCB, Sandoz, Menarini, Takeda, and Will-Pharma, unrelated to this work. All other authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. JD has received a fellowship (11A9320N) and travel support from Research Foundation Flanders (FWO).

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mordant, G., Dupont, J., Van Heghe, A. et al. Response to the comment on: Effects of Orthogeriatric Care Models on Outcomes of Hip Fracture Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 110, 761–763 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00943-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00943-z

Search

Navigation