Advertisement

Loss of Lgals3 Protects Against Gonadectomy-Induced Cortical Bone Loss in Mice

  • Kevin A. Maupin
  • Daniel Dick
  • Johan Lee
  • Bart O. WilliamsEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

Sex hormone deprivation commonly occurs following menopause in women or after androgen-depletion during prostate cancer therapy in men, resulting in rapid bone turnover and loss of bone mass. There is a need to identify novel therapies to improve bone mass in these conditions. Previously, we identified age- and sex-dependent effects on bone mass in mice with deletion of the gene encoding the β-galactoside binding lectin, galectin-3 (Lgals3-KO). Due to the influence of sex on the phenotype, we tested the role of sex hormones, estrogen (β-estradiol; E2), and androgen (5α-dihydroxytestosterone; DHT) in Lgals3-KO mice. To address this, we subjected male and female wild-type and Lgals3-KO mice to gonadectomy ± E2 or DHT rescue and compared differential responses in bone mass and bone formation. Following gonadectomy, male and female Lgals3-KO mice had greater cortical bone expansion (increased total area; T.Ar) and reduced loss of bone area (B.Ar). While T.Ar and B.Ar were increased in response to DHT in wild-type mice, DHT did not alter these parameters in Lgals3-KO mice. E2 rescue more strongly increased B.Ar in Lgals3-KO compared to wild-type female mice due to a failure of E2 to repress the increase in T.Ar following gonadectomy. Lgals3-KO mice had more osteoblasts relative to bone surface when compared to wild-type animals in sham, gonadectomy, and E2 rescue groups. DHT suppressed this increase. This study revealed a mechanism for the sex-dependency of the Lgals3-KO aging bone phenotype and supports targeting galectin-3 to protect against bone loss associated with decreased sex hormone production.

Keywords

Genetic animal models Sex steroids Bone µCT Bone histomorphometry Galectin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Williams laboratory at VARI for their assistance; David Nadziejka for assistance in preparing the manuscript; Lisa Turner, Carrie Joynt, and the rest of the VARI histology core for their histology work; and VARI’s vivarium staff for outstanding animal husbandry. This project was funded by Van Andel Research Institute and Van Andel Institute Graduate School, Grand Rapids, MI.

Author Contributions

KAM designed the study, performed the surgeries and analyses, and drafted the manuscript. DD and JL contributed to the experimental work. BOW oversaw the study, provided critical guidance, and was a major contributor to manuscript revisions. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version. All authors agree to be accountable for the work and to ensure that any questions relating to the accuracy and integrity of the paper are investigated and properly resolved.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Authors Kevin A. Maupin, Daniel Dick, Johan Lee, and Bart O. Williams have declared no conflicts of interest associated with this study. BOW has served as a consultant for Amgen, is an Advisory Board member at Surrozen, and has research support from Janssen in areas unrelated to this study.

Human and Animal Rights

All animal procedures were carried out in compliance with the regulations and guidelines set by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at VARI. The protocols used were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at VARI prior to the initiation of experiments.

Supplementary material

223_2019_630_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (45 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 45 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Manolagas SC (2000) Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 21(2):115–137PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd (2002) Sex steroids and the construction and conservation of the adult skeleton. Endocr Rev 23(3):279–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riggs BL, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd (1998) A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res 13(5):763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Looker AC et al (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8(5):468–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    MT Schweizer, EY Yu (2017) AR-signaling in human malignancies: Prostate cancer and beyond. Cancers 9(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang A et al (2015) Risk of fracture in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy: a population-based cohort study in New Zealand. BMC Cancer 15:837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chernichenko OA et al (2014) Effect of androgen suppression on bone mineral density in patients with prostate cancer. Experimental Oncology 36(4):276–278PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowlis D et al (1995) Galectin-3 is expressed in the notochord, developing bones, and skin of the postimplantation mouse embryo. Dev Dyn 203(2):241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colnot C et al (1999) Cellular and subcellular distribution of galectin-3 in the epiphyseal cartilage and bone of fetal and neonatal mice. Cell Mol Biol 45(8):1191–1202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Montcalm A et al (2007) Extracellular localization of galectin-3 has a deleterious role in joint tissues. Arthritis Res Ther 9(1):R20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakajima K et al (2014) Galectin-3 inhibits osteoblast differentiation through notch signaling. Neoplasia 16(11):939–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weilner S et al (2016) Vesicular galectin-3 levels decrease with donor age and contribute to the reduced osteo-inductive potential of human plasma derived extracellular vesicles. Aging 8(1):16–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iacobini C et al (2018) Galectin-3 is essential for proper bone cell differentiation and activity, bone remodeling and biomechanical competence in mice. Metabolism 83:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maupin KA et al (2018) Enhanced cortical bone expansion in Lgals3-deficient mice during aging. Bone Res 6(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li YJ et al (2009) A possible suppressive role of galectin-3 in upregulated osteoclastogenesis accompanying adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats. Lab Investig 89(1):26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ortega N et al (2005) Galectin-3 is a downstream regulator of matrix metalloproteinase-9 function during endochondral bone formation. Mol Biol Cell 16(6):3028–3039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simon D et al (2017) Galectin-3 as a novel regulator of osteoblast-osteoclast interaction and bone homeostasis. Bone 105:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakajima K et al (2016) Galectin-3 Cleavage Alters Bone Remodeling: Different Outcomes in Breast and Prostate Cancer Skeletal Metastasis. Can Res 76(6):1391–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oestreich AK et al (2016) Decreasing maternal myostatin programs adult offspring bone strength in a mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(47):13522–13527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Turner CH, Burr DB (1993) Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone 14(4):595–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pugliese G et al (2015) The dark and bright side of atherosclerotic calcification. Atherosclerosis 238(2):220–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menini S et al (2013) The galectin-3/RAGE dyad modulates vascular osteogenesis in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res 100(3):472–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sadaba JR et al (2016) Role for galectin-3 in calcific aortic valve stenosis. J Am Heart Assoc 5(11):e004360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Boer RA et al (2012) The fibrosis marker galectin-3 and outcome in the general population. J Intern Med 272(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    MacLean HE et al (2010) DNA-binding-dependent androgen receptor signaling contributes to gender differences and has physiological actions in males and females. J Endocrinol 206(1):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seeman E (2001) Clinical review 137: Sexual dimorphism in skeletal size, density, and strength. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(10):4576–4584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Russell PK et al (2012) Identification of gene pathways altered by deletion of the androgen receptor specifically in mineralizing osteoblasts and osteocytes in mice. J Mol Endocrinol 49(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chiang C et al (2009) Mineralization and bone resorption are regulated by the androgen receptor in male mice. J Bone Miner Res 24(4):621–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rowas SA et al (2012) Effect of in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol on lumbar and femoral bone, articular cartilage, and the intervertebral disc in male and female adult mice progeny with and without swimming exercise. Arthr Res Ther 14(1):R17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Migliaccio S et al (1996) Alterations of maternal estrogen levels during gestation affect the skeleton of female offspring. Endocrinology 137(5):2118–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Migliaccio S et al (2000) Transient estrogen exposure of female mice during early development permanently affects osteoclastogenesis in adulthood. Bone 27(1):47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Darrow AL, Shohet RV (2015) Galectin-3 deficiency exacerbates hyperglycemia and the endothelial response to diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 14:73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tchaikovski SN, Rosing J (2010) Mechanisms of estrogen-induced venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 126(1):5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    McDonald TP et al (1992) Sex- and strain-related differences in megakaryocytopoiesis and platelet production in C3H and BALB/c mice. J Lab Clin Med 120(1):168–173PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program for Skeletal Disease and Tumor Microenvironment and Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Research InstituteGrand RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations