Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Novel Use of a Dektak 150 Surface Profiler Unmasks Differences in Resorption Pit Profiles Between Control and Charcot Patient Osteoclasts

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 18 February 2014

Abstract

We hypothesized that newly formed osteoclasts from patients with acute Charcot osteoarthropathy can resorb surfaces of bone more extensively compared with controls. Peripheral blood monocytes, isolated from eight Charcot patients and nine controls, were cultured in vitro on 24-well plates and bovine bone discs in duplicate with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor κβ ligand (RANKL). Osteoclast formation was assessed by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase staining (TRAcP) at day 17. Resorption was measured at day 21 after toluidine blue staining by two methods: (1) area of resorption at the surface by image analysis (%) and (2) area of resorption under the surface (μm2) measured by a Dektak 150 Surface Profiler. Ten 1,000 μm-long scans were performed per disc. Pits were classified as unidented, bidented, and multidented according to their shape. Although the number of newly formed TRAcP positive multinucleated cells (>3 nuclei) was similar in M-CSF + RANKL-treated cultures between controls and Charcot patients, the latter exhibited increased resorbing activity. The area of resorption on the surface by image analysis was significantly greater in Charcot patients compared with controls (21.1 % [14.5–26.2] vs. 40.8 % [35.4–46.0], median [25–75th percentile], p < 0.01), as was the area of resorption under the surface (2.7 μm2 [1.6–3.9] vs. 8.3 μm2 [5.6–10.6], p < 0.01) after profilometry. In Charcot patients pits were deeper and wider and more frequently presented as multidented pits. This application of the Dektak 150 Surface Profiler revealed novel differences in resorption pit profile from osteoclasts derived from Charcot patients compared with controls. Resorption in Charcot patients was mediated by highly aggressive newly formed osteoclasts from monocytes eroding large and deep areas of bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petrova NL, Edmonds ME (2008) Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy—current standards. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 24(1):S58–S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeffcoate WJ (2005) Theories concerning the pathogenesis of the acute Charcot foot suggest future therapy. Curr Diabetes Rep 5:430–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Teitelbaum SL (2000) Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 289:1504–1508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujikawa Y, Quinn JM, Sabokbar A, McGee JO, Athanasou NA (1996) The human osteoclast precursor circulates in the monocyte fraction. Endocrinology 137:4058–4060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, Yamaguchi K, Kinosaki M, Mochizuki S, Tomoyasu A, Yano K, Goto M, Murakami A, Tsuda E, Morinaga T, Higashio K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Suda T (1998) Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3597–3602

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka S, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Tamura T, Akatsu T, Stanley ER, Kurokawa T, Suda T (1993) Macrophage colony-stimulating factor is indispensable for both proliferation and differentiation of osteoclast progenitors. J Clin Invest 91:257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henriksen K, Bollerslev J, Everts V, Karsdal MA (2011) Osteoclast activity and subtypes as a function of physiology and pathology—implications for future treatments of osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 32:31–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teitelbaum SL (2007) Osteoclasts: what do they do and how do they do it? Am J Pathol 170:427–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Husheem M, Nyman JK, Vääräniemi J, Vaananen HK, Hentunen TA (2005) Characterization of circulating human osteoclast progenitors: development of in vitro resorption assay. Calcif Tissue Int 76:222–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mabilleau G, Petrova NL, Edmonds ME, Sabokbar A (2008) Increased osteoclastic activity in acute Charcot’s osteoarthropathy: the role of receptor activator of nuclear factor–kappaB ligand. Diabetologia 51:1035–1040

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuller K, Murphy C, Kirstein B, Fox SW, Chambers TJ (2002) TNFα potently activates osteoclasts, through a direct action independent of and strongly synergistic with RANKL. Endocrinology 143:1108–1118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soysa NS, Alles N, Aoki K, Ohya K (2009) Three-dimensional characterization of osteoclast bone-resorbing activity in the resorption lacunae. J Med Dent Sci 56:107–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pascaretti-Grizon F, Mabilleau G, Basle MF, Chappard D (2011) Measurement by vertical scanning profilometry of resorption volume and lacunae depth caused by osteoclasts on dentine slices. J Microsc 241:147–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Asagiri M, Hirai T, Kunigami T, Kamano S, Gober HJ, Okamoto K, Nishikawa K, Latz E, Golenbock DT, Aoki K, Ohya K, Imai Y, Morishita Y, Miyazono K, Kato S, Saftig P, Takayanagi H (2008) Cathepsin K-dependent toll-like receptor 9 signaling revealed in experimental arthritis. Science 319:624–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parikka V, Lehenkari P, Sassi ML, Halleen J, Risteli J, Härkönen P, Väänänen HK (2001) Estrogen reduces the depth of resorption pits by disturbing the organic bone matrix degradation activity of mature osteoclasts. Endocrinology 142:5371–5378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soe K, Delaisse JM (2010) Glucocorticoids maintain human osteoclasts in the active mode of their resorption cycle. J Bone Miner Res 25:2184–2192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goff MG, Slyfield CR, Kummari SR, Tkachenko EV, Fischer SE, Yi YH, Jekir MG, Keaveny TM, Hernandez CJ (2012) Three-dimensional characterization of resorption cavity size and location in human vertebral trabecular bone. Bone 51:28–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeffcoate WJ, Game F, Cavanagh PR (2005) The role of proinflammatory cytokines in the cause of neuropathic osteoarthropathy (acute Charcot foot) in diabetes. Lancet 366:2058–2061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uccioli L, Sinistro A, Almerighi C, Ciaprini C, Cavazza A, Giurato L, Ruotolo V, Spasaro F, Vainieri E, Rocchi G, Bergamini A (2010) Proinflammatory modulation of the surface and cytokine phenotype of monocytes in patients with acute Charcot foot. Diabetes Care 33:350–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McGowan NW, Walker EJ, Macpherson H, Ralston SH, Helfrich MH (2001) Cytokine-activated endothelium recruits osteoclast precursors. Endocrinology 142:1678–1681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by Diabetes Research and Wellness Foundation. NLP is a holder of a Diabetes Research and Wellness Foundation Clinical Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina L. Petrova.

Additional information

The authors report that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrova, N.L., Petrov, P.K., Edmonds, M.E. et al. Novel Use of a Dektak 150 Surface Profiler Unmasks Differences in Resorption Pit Profiles Between Control and Charcot Patient Osteoclasts. Calcif Tissue Int 94, 403–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-013-9820-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-013-9820-9

Keywords

Navigation