Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Study on Measured Variables and Sensitivity to Bone Microstructural Changes Induced by Weightlessness Between In Vivo and Ex Vivo Micro-CT Scans

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Depending on the experimental design, micro-CT can be used to examine bones either in vivo or ex vivo (excised fresh or formalin-fixed). In this study we investigated if differences exist in the variables measured by micro-CT between in vivo and ex vivo scans and which kind of scan is more sensitive to the changes of bone microstructure induced by simulated weightlessness. Rat tail suspension was used to simulate the weightless condition. The same bone from either normal or tail-suspended rats was scanned by micro-CT both in vivo and ex vivo (fresh and fixed by formalin). Then, bone mineral density (BMD) and microstructural characteristics were analyzed. The results showed that no significant differences existed in the microstructural parameters of trabecular bone among in vivo, fresh, and formalin-fixed bone scans from both femurs and tibias, although BMD exhibited differences. On the other hand, most parameters of the tail-suspended rats measured by micro-CT deteriorated compared with controls. Ex vivo scanning appeared to be more sensitive to bone microstructural changes induced by tail suspension than in vivo scanning. In general, the results indicate that values obtained in vivo and ex vivo (fresh and fixed) are comparable, thus allowing for meaningful comparison of experimental results from different studies irrespective of the type of scans. In addition, this study suggests that it is better to use ex vivo scanning when evaluating bone microstructure under weightlessness. However, researchers can select any type of scan depending upon the objective and the demands of the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carmeliet GC, Vico L, Bouillon R (2001) Space flight: a challenge for normal bone homeostasis. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 11:131–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloomfield SA, Allen MR, Hogan HA, Delp MD (2002) Site- and compartment-specific changes in bone with hindlimb unloading in mature adult rats. Bone 31:149–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jiang Y-B, Jacobson J, Genant HK, Zhao J (2007) Application of micro-CT and MRI in clinical and preclinical studies of osteoporosis and related disorders. In: Qin L, Genant HK, Griffith J, Leung K-S (eds) Advanced bioimaging technologies in assessment of the quality of bone and scaffold materials. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 399–416

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Laib A, Barou O, Vico L, Lafage-Proust MH, Alexandre C, Rügsegger P (2000) 3D micro-computed tomography of trabecular and cortical bone architecture with application to a rat model of immobilisation osteoporosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 38:326–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rüegsegger P, Koller B, Müller R (1996) A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 58:24–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M (1989) The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 4:3–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G (1990) Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res 8:833–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD (2005) In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6508–6515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khosla S, Riggs BL, Atkinson EJ, Oberg AL, McDaniel LJ, Holets M, Peterson JM, Melton LJ (2006) Effects of sex and age on bone microstructure at the ultradistal radius: a population-based noninvasive in vivo assessment. J Bone Miner Res 21:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. David V, Laroche N, Boudignon B, Lafage-Proust MH, Alexandre C, Ruegsegger P, Vico L (2003) Noninvasive in vivo monitoring of bone architecture alterations in hindlimb-unloaded female rats using novel three-dimensional microcomputed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 18:1622–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waarsing JH, Day JS, van der Linden JC, Ederveen AG, Spanjers C, De Clerck N, Sasov A, Verhaar JA, Weinans H (2004) Detecting and tracking local changes in the tibiae of individual rats: a novel method to analyse longitudinal in vivo micro-CT data. Bone 34:163–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinney JH, Lane NE, Haupt DL (1995) In vivo, three-dimensional microscopy of trabecular bone. J Bone Miner Res 10:264–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joo YI, Sone T, Fukunaga M, Lim SG, Onodera S (2003) Effects of endurance exercise on three-dimensional trabecular bone microarchitecture in young growing rats. Bone 33:485–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Akhter MP, Lappe JM, Davies KM, Recker RR (2007) Transmenopausal changes in the trabecular bone structure. Bone 41:111–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang Y, Zhao J, Van Audekercke R, Dequekeer J, Geusens P (1996) Effects of low-dose long-term sodium fluoride preventive treatment on rat bone mass and biomechanical properties. Calcif Tissue Int 58:30–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J, Long BL, Bai JP, Lv R, Yang PK (2009) Comparative of micro-CT and histological section in bone morphometry [in Chinese]. Orthop J Chin 17:381–384

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Jian-wei Xue and Tian Xie for their contribution to the experiments and Prof. Xiaodu Wang (University of Texas at San Antonio) for English revision. This work was funded by grants from the National Key Technology R&D Program (2009BAI79B03) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10925208, 10872024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Bo Fan.

Additional information

The authors have stated that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, L.W., Wang, C., Pu, F. et al. Comparative Study on Measured Variables and Sensitivity to Bone Microstructural Changes Induced by Weightlessness Between In Vivo and Ex Vivo Micro-CT Scans. Calcif Tissue Int 88, 48–53 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-010-9422-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-010-9422-8

Keywords

Navigation