A 3-Year Physical Activity Intervention Program Increases the Gain in Bone Mineral and Bone Width in Prepubertal Girls but not Boys: The Prospective Copenhagen School Child Interventions Study (CoSCIS)

  • H. A. Hasselstrøm
  • M. K. Karlsson
  • S. E. Hansen
  • V. Grønfeldt
  • K. Froberg
  • L. B. Andersen
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing the amount of time spent in physical education classes on bone mineral accrual and gain in bone size in prepubertal Danish children. A total of 135 boys and 108 girls, aged 6–8 years, were included in a school-based curriculum intervention program where the usual time spent in physical education classes was doubled to four classes (180 min) per week. The control group comprised age-matched children (62 boys and 76 girls) recruited from a separate community who completed the usual Danish school curriculum of physical activity (90 min/week). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to evaluate bone mineral content (BMC; g), bone mineral density (g/cm2), and bone width at the calcaneus and distal forearm before and after 3 years of intervention. Anthropometrics and Tanner stages were evaluated on the same occasions. General physical activity was measured with an accelerometer worn for 4 days. In girls, the intervention group had a 12.5% increase (P = 0.04) in distal forearm BMC and a 13.2% increase (P = 0.005) in distal forearm scanned area compared with girls in the control group. No differences were found between the intervention and control groups in boys. Increasing the frequency of physical education classes for prepubertal children is associated with a higher accrual of bone mineral and higher gain in bone size after 3 years in girls but not in boys.

Keywords

Exercise intervention Bone mineral density Bone size Children Population based 

References

  1. 1.
    Davies JH, Evans BAJ, Gregory JW (2005) Bone mass acquisition in healthy children. Arch Dis Child 90:373–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, Genant HK, Palermo L, Scott J, Vogt TM (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet 341:72–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:397–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kannus P, Haapasalo H, Sankelo M, Sievanen H, Pasanen M, Heinonen A, Oja P, Vuori I (1995) Effect of starting age of physical activity on bone mass in the dominant arm of tennis and squash players. Ann Intern Med 123:27–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1984) Static vs. dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 17:897–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan K, McKay HA, Kannus P, Bailey DA, Wark JD, Bennell KL (2001) Physical activity and bone health. Human Kinetics, Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sundberg M, Gardsell P, Johnell O, Karlsson MK, Ornstein E, Sandstedt B, Sernbo I (2002) Physical activity increases bone size in prepubertal boys and bone mass in prepubertal girls: a combined cross-sectional and 3-year longitudinal study. Calcif Tissue Int 71:406–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gutin B, Kasper MJ (1992) Can vigorous exercise play a role in osteoporosis prevention? A review. Osteopor Int 2:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forwood MR, Burr DB (1993) Physical activity and bone mass: exercise infutility? Bone Mineral 21:89–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nordström P, Pettersson U, Lorentzon R (1998) Type of physical activity, muscle strength, and pubertal stage as determinants of bone mineral density and bone area in adolescent boys. J Bone Miner Res 13:1141–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morris FL, Naughton GA, Gibbs JL, Carlson JS, Wark JD (1997) Prospective 10-month exercise intervention in premenarcheal girls: positive effects on bone and lean mass. J Bone Miner Res 12:1453–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bradney M, Pearce G, Naughton G, Sullivan C, Bass S, Beck T, Carlson J, Seeman E (1998) Moderate exercise during growth in prepubertal boys: changes in bone mass, size, volumetric density, and bone strength: a controlled prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 13:1814–1821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacKelvie KJ, McKay HA, Petit MA, Moran O, Khan KM (2002) Bone mineral response to a 7-month randomized controlled, school-based jumping intervention in 121 prepubertal boys: associations with ethnicity and body mass index. J Bone Miner Res 17:834–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKay HA, Petit MA, Schultz RW, Prior JC, Barr SI, Khan KM (2000) Augmented trochanteric bone mineral density after modified physical education classes: a randomized school-based exercise intervention study in prepubescent and early pubescent children. J Pediatr 136:156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, Petit MA, Janssen PA, McKay HA (2003) A school-based exercise intervention elicits substantial bone health benefits: a 2-year randomized controlled trial in girls. Pediatrics 112:e447–e452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacKelvie KJ, Petit MA, Khan KM, Beck TJ, McKay HA (2004) Bone mass and structure are enhanced following a 2-year randomized controlled trial of exercise in prepubertal boys. Bone 34:755–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacKelvie KJ, McKay HA, Khan KM, Crocker PR (2001) A school-based exercise intervention augments bone mineral accrual in early pubertal girls. J Pediatr 139:501–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Valdimarsson O, Linden C, Johnell O, Gardsell P, Karlsson MK (2006) Daily physical education in the school curriculum in prepubertal girls during 1 year is followed by an increase in bone mineral accrual and bone width—data from the prospective controlled Malmo Pediatric Osteoporosis Prevention Study. Calcif Tissue Int 78:65–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linden C, Alwis G, Ahlborg H, Gardsell P, Valdimarsson O, Stenevi-Lundgren S, Besjakov J, Karlsson MK (2007) Exercise, bone mass and bone size in prepubertal boys: one-year data from the Pediatric Osteoporosis Prevention Study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:340–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Linden C, Ahlborg HG, Besjakov J, Gardsell P, Karlsson MK (2006) A school curriculum–based exercise program increases bone mineral accrual and bone size in prepubertal girls: two-year data from the Pediatric Osteoporosis Prevention (POP) study. J Bone Miner Res 21:829–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bailey RC, Olson J, Pepper SL, Porzasz J, Barstow TJ, Cooper DM (1995) The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:1033–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    De Lorenzo A, Bertini I, Candeloro N, Iacopino L, Andreoli A, Van Loan MD (1998) Comparison of different techniques to measure body composition in moderately active adolescents. Br J Sports Med 32:215–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Altmann DG (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janz KF, Burns TL, Levy SM, Torner JC, Willing MC, Beck TJ, Gilmore JM, Marshall TA (2004) Everyday activity predicts bone geometry in children: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:1124–1131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Janz KF, Burns TL, Torner JC, Levy SM, Paulos R, Willing MC, Warren JJ (2001) Physical activity and bone measures in young children: the Iowa Bone Development Study. Pediatrics 107:1387–1393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ridgers ND, Stratton G, Fairclough SJ (2005) Assessing physical activity during recess using accelerometry. Prev Med 41:102–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riddoch CJ, Bo AL, Wedderkopp N, Harro M, Klasson-Heggebo L, Sardinha LB, Cooper AR, Ekelund U (2004) Physical activity levels and patterns of 9- and 15-yr-old European children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:86–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trost SG, Pate RR, Sallis JF, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M, Sirard J (2002) Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:350–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hasselstrom H, Karlsson KM, Hansen SE, Gronfeldt V, Froberg K, Andersen LB (2006) Sex differences in bone size and bone mineral density exist before puberty. The Copenhagen School Child Intervention Study (CoSCIS). Calcif Tissue Int 79:7–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PR, Faulkner RA (1999) A six-year longitudinal study of the relationship of physical activity to bone mineral accrual in growing children: the University of Saskatchewan Bone Mineral Accrual Study. J Bone Miner Res 14:1672–1679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bass S, Pearce G, Bradney M, Hendrich E, Delmas PD, Harding A, Seeman E (1998) Exercise before puberty may confer residual benefits in bone density in adulthood: studies in active prepubertal and retired female gymnasts. J Bone Miner Res 13:500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fuchs RK, Bauer JJ, Snow CM (2001) Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 16:148–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McKay HA, Petit MA, Bailey DA, Wallace WM, Schutz RW, Khan KM (2000) Analysis of proximal femur DXA scans in growing children: comparisons of different protocols for cross-sectional 8-month and 7-year longitudinal data. J Bone Miner Res 15:1181–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cussler EC, Going SB, Houtkooper LB, Stanford VA, Blew RM, Flint-Wagner HG, Metcalfe LL, Choi JE, Lohman TG (2005) Exercise frequency and calcium intake predict 4-year bone changes in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16:2129–2141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Robling AG, Hinant FM, Burr DB, Turner CH (2002) Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts. J Bone Miner Res 17:1545–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bass SL, Saxon L, Daly RM, Turner CH, Robling AG, Seeman E, Stuckey S (2002) The effect of mechanical loading on the size and shape of bone in pre-, peri-, and postpubertal girls: a study in tennis players. J Bone Miner Res 17:2274–2280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Janz K (2002) Physical activity and bone development during childhood and adolescence. Implications for the prevention of osteoporosis. Minerva Pediatr 54:93–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Branca F, Valtuena S, Vatuena S (2001) Calcium, physical activity and bone health–building bones for a stronger future. Public Health Nutr 4:117–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Vuori I (2000) Exercise-induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27:351–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Pasanen M, Vuori I (2003) Effect of long-term impact-loading on mass, size, and estimated strength of humerus and radius of female racquet-sports players: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study between young and old starters and controls. J Bone Miner Res 18:352–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Duan Y, Seeman E, Turner CH (2001) The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 16:2276–2283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C, Edmonds J (2001) Fracture site–specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:120–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Turner CH, Rannevik G, Karlsson MK (2003) Bone loss and bone size after menopause. N Engl J Med 349:327–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Duan Y, Parfitt A, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. A. Hasselstrøm
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. K. Karlsson
    • 3
  • S. E. Hansen
    • 4
  • V. Grønfeldt
    • 1
  • K. Froberg
    • 5
  • L. B. Andersen
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Institute for Exercise and Sport SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.FrederiksbergDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research UnitLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.Team DenmarkBroendbyDenmark
  5. 5.Institute of Sports Science and Clinical BiomechanicsUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense UniversityOdenseDenmark
  6. 6.Department of Sports MedicineNorwegian School of Sport SciencesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations