Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative Assessment of Bone Tissue Mineralization with Polychromatic Micro-Computed Tomography

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micro-computed tomography (μCT) has become an important tool for morphological characterization of cortical and trabecular bone. Quantitative assessment of bone tissue mineral density (TMD) from μCT images may be possible; however, the methods for calibration and accuracy have not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigated hydroxyapatite (HA) phantom sampling limitations, short-term reproducibility of phantom measurements, and accuracy of TMD measurements by correlation to ash density. Additionally, the performance of a global and a local threshold for determining TMD was tested. The full length of a commercial density phantom was imaged by μCT, and mean calibration parameters were determined for a volume of interest (VOI) at 10 random positions along the longitudinal axis. Ten different VOI lengths were used (0.9–13 mm). The root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated for each scan length. Short-term reproducibility was assessed by five repeat phantom measurements for three source voltage settings. Accuracy was evaluated by imaging rat cortical bone (n = 16) and bovine trabecular bone (n = 15), followed by ash gravimetry. Phantom heterogeneity was associated with <0.5% RMSE. The coefficient of variation for five repeat measurements was generally <0.25% across all energies and phantom densities. Bone mineral content was strongly correlated to ash weight (R 2 = 1.00 for both specimen groups and both threshold methods). Ash density was well correlated for the trabecular bone specimens (R 2 > 0.80). In cortical bone specimens, the correlation was somewhat weaker when a global threshold was applied (R 2 = 0.67) compared to the local threshold method (R 2 = 0.78).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hildebrand T, Laib A, Muller R, Dequeker J, Ruegsegger P (1999) Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. J Bone Miner Res 14:1167–1174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1997) Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1:15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1997) A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 185:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Odgaard A, Gundersen HJ (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14:173–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ulrich D, van Rietbergen B, Laib A, Ruegsegger P (1999) The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone 25:55–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L (1988) Iliac crest trabecular bone volume as predictor for vertebral compressive strength, ash density and trabecular bone volume in normal individuals. Bone 9:195–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Follet H, Boivin G, Rumelhart C, Meunier PJ (2004) The degree of mineralization is a determinant of bone strength: a study on human calcanei. Bone 34:783–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boivin GY, Chavassieux PM, Santora AC, Yates J, Meunier PJ (2000) Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women. Bone 27:687–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boivin G, Meunier PJ (2002) The degree of mineralization of bone tissue measured by computerized quantitative contact microradiography. Calcif Tissue Int 70:503–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paschalis EP, Betts F, DiCarlo E, Mendelsohn R, Boskey AL (1997) FTIR microspectroscopic analysis of human iliac crest biopsies from untreated osteoporotic bone. Calcif Tissue Int 61:487–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roschger P, Fratzl P, Eschberger J, Klaushofer K (1998) Validation of quantitative backscattered electron imaging for the measurement of mineral density distribution in human bone biopsies. Bone 23:319–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nuzzo S, Peyrin F, Cloetens P, Baruchel J, Boivin G (2002) Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. Med Phys 29:2672–2681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Postnov AA, Vinogradov AV, van Dyck D, Saveliev SV, De Clerck NM (2003) Quantitative analysis of bone mineral content by X-ray microtomography. Physiol Meas 24:165–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sone T, Tamada T, Jo Y, Miyoshi H, Fukunaga M (2004) Analysis of three-dimensional microarchitecture and degree of mineralization in bone metastases from prostate cancer using synchrotron microcomputed tomography. Bone 35:432–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nuzzo S, Lafage-Proust MH, Martin-Badosa E, Boivin G, Thomas T, Alexandre C, Peyrin F (2002) Synchrotron radiation microtomography allows the analysis of three-dimensional microarchitecture and degree of mineralization of human iliac crest biopsy specimens: effects of etidronate treatment. J Bone Miner Res 17:1372–1382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Borah B, Ritman EL, Dufresne TE, Jorgensen SM, Liu S, Sacha J, Phipps RJ, Turner RT (2005) The effect of risedronate on bone mineralization as measured by micro-computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: correlation to histomorphometric indices of turnover. Bone 37:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Borah B, Dufresne TE, Ritman EL, Jorgensen SM, Liu S, Chmielewski PA, Phipps RJ, Zhou X, Sibonga JD, Turner RT (2006) Long-term risedronate treatment normalizes mineralization and continues to preserve trabecular architecture: sequential triple biopsy studies with micro-computed tomography. Bone 39:345–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW (1984) Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1:612–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R (1996) A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 58:24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nazarian A, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Muller R, Snyder BD (2003) A quantitative technique to assess bone density from micro-computed tomography. ORS Annual Meeting Transactions ISSN 0149-6433

  21. Mulder L, Koolstra JH, Van Eijden TM (2004) Accuracy of microCT in the quantitative determination of the degree and distribution of mineralization in developing bone. Acta Radiol 45:769–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ridler TW (1978) Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8:630–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burghardt AJ, Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S (2007) A local adaptive threshold strategy for high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography of trabecular bone. Ann Biomed Eng 35:1678–1686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berger MJ, Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM, Chang J, Coursey JS, Sukumar R, Zucker DS (1990) XCOM: photon cross sections database. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waarsing JH, Day JS, Weinans H (2004) An improved segmentation method for in vivo microCT imaging. J Bone Miner Res 19:1640–1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schweizer S, Hattendorf B, Schneider P, Aeschlimann B, Gauckler L, Muller R, Gunther D (2007) Preparation and characterization of calibration standards for bone density determination by micro-computed tomography. Analyst 132:1040–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Tony Keaveny and the Orthopedic Biomechanics Lab at the University of California Berkeley for providing tissue and use of tissue-processing facilities. We also thank Margarita Meta of the University of California Los Angeles and Jennifer Schuyler of the University of California San Francisco Anesthesiology for providing and helping with the rat specimens. This study was supported with funds from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 AG17762 to S. M. and F32 AR053446 to G.J.K.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Burghardt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burghardt, A.J., Kazakia, G.J., Laib, A. et al. Quantitative Assessment of Bone Tissue Mineralization with Polychromatic Micro-Computed Tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 83, 129–138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-008-9158-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-008-9158-x

Keywords

Navigation