Skip to main content


Log in

Utility Values Associated with Osteoporotic Fracture: A Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 22 May 2008


We reviewed studies that have estimated the impact of osteoporotic fracture on quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and to determine reference values for countries that would like to carry out cost–utility analyses but that do not have their own values. The computerized medical literature databases Medline and EMBASE were searched from January 1990 to December 2006. The search was carried out in two steps. The first step was to identify studies that related to quality of life in osteoporosis. As part of the second step, only the studies that translated quality of life into a utility value (one single value for health status ranging 0–1) and calculated a utility loss over a period of at least 1 year were selected. From the 152 studies identified in the first analysis, only 16 were retained after the second step. Ten studies investigated utility values for hip fractures, 11 for vertebral fractures, five for distal forearm fractures, and four for other osteoporotic fractures and fracture interactions. Utility values differed substantially between studies, partly due to the valuation technique used, the severity of fractures, and the sample size. This review suggests that there is no meaningful average value across different studies, different samples, different countries, or different instruments. Although we tried to determine the best available values, these values do not preclude the need for country-specific studies. Finally, we also make recommendations regarding the design and methodology for such studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (eds) (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  2. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds) (1996) Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, New York

  3. National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction. Osteoporos Int 8 Suppl 4:S7–S80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zethraeus N, Borgstrom F, Strom O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B (2007) Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis—a review of the literature and a reference model. Osteoporos Int 18:9–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lips P, van Schoor NM (2005) Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 16:447–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tosteson AN, Jonsson B, Grima DT, O’Brien BJ, Black DM, Adachi JD (2001) Challenges for model-based economic evaluations of postmenopausal osteoporosis interventions. Osteoporos Int 12:849–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ 3rd, Moncur MM, Ettinger B, Tosteson AN (1999) Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Making 19:141–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hiligsmann M, Ethgen O, Richy F, Reginster JY (2007) Utility values associated with osteoporosis: a systematic literature review. Working paper HECULG 200703/02.

  9. Stevenson M, Lloyd Jones M, De Nigris E, Brewer N, Davis S, Oakley J (2005) A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Health Technol Assess 9:1–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjo K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17:637–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brazier JE, Kohler B, Walters S (2000) A prospective study of the health related quality of life impact of hip fracture. ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murray CWS, Brazier JE (2002) Utility following a fracture in a group of elderly women. Qual Life Res 11:642

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Grove MR, Moncur MM, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ 3rd (2001) Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int 12:1042–1049

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C, Kanis J (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, Harper KD, Xie S (2001) The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study. Arthritis Rheum 44:2611–2619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fechtenbaum J, Cropet C, Kolta S, Horlait S, Orcel P, Roux C (2005) The severity of vertebral fractures and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16:2175–2179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dolan P, Torgerson D, Kakarlapudi TK (1999) Health-related quality of life of Colles’ fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 9:196–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 15:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Melton LJ 3rd, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Tosteson AN, Johnell O, Kanis JA (2003) Cost-equivalence of different osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 14:383–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Gennari C, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kiss C, Masaryk P, Naves M, Poor G, Raspe H, Reid DM, Reeve J, Stepan J, Todd C, Woolf AD, O’Neill TW (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:113–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brazier JE, Green C, Kanis JA (2002) A systematic review of health state utility values for osteoporosis-related conditions. Osteoporos Int 13:768–776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jonsson B, Christiansen C, Johnell O, Hedbrandt J (1995) Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 5:136–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985–1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ross PD (1997) Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med 103:30S–43S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Strom O, Kanis JA (2006) An economic evaluation of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporosis in a Swedish setting: based on the results of the SOTI and TROPOS trials. Osteoporos Int 17:1781–1793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris R, Masud T (2001) Measuring quality of life in osteoporosis. Age Ageing 30:371–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, Caulin F, Egger P, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Liberman U, Minne H, Reeve J, Reginster JY, de Vernejoul MC, Wiklund I (1997) Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:36–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tosteson AN, Hammond CS (2002) Quality-of-life assessment in osteoporosis: health-status and preference-based measures. Pharmacoeconomics 20:289–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanis JA, Brazier JE, Stevenson M, Calvert NW, Lloyd Jones M (2002) Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Assess 6:1–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mickaël Hiligsmann.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiligsmann, M., Ethgen, O., Richy, F. et al. Utility Values Associated with Osteoporotic Fracture: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Calcif Tissue Int 82, 288–292 (2008).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: