Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 85–91 | Cite as

Refracture following Fracture Liaison Service Assessment Illustrates the Requirement for Integrated Falls and Fracture Services

  • Claire R. Langridge
  • Carol McQuillian
  • Walter S. Watson
  • Barbara Walker
  • Lara Mitchell
  • Stephen J. Gallacher
Article

Abstract

The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) allows appropriate antiosteoporosis therapy to be targeted to potentially reduce future fracture risk. A proportion of these treated patients will still experience a further fracture. This work reviews the characteristics of these patients. Data were collated for patients >65 years old presenting to the South Glasgow FLS between January 2001 and August 2004. There were 2,489 patients who presented (incident fracture group), and 129 (5.2%) sustained an additional fracture (refracture group). Median age of the incident fracture group was 77.8 years vs. 80.6 years for the refracture group (P = nonsignificant). The refracture group was determined according to whether their incident fracture was hip (n = 47) or nonhip (n = 82). When the incident fracture was hip, a refracture was more likely to be a further hip fracture (χ2 = 14.4, P = 0.002) and patients refractured sooner (median time to refracture 194 [range 10–1,134] days vs. 258 [range 6–1,081] days [nonhip]) (P = nonsignificant). In the refracture group, 76% of patients were already on osteoporosis treatment after their incident fracture. Patients over 65 years of age presenting to FLS who sustain an additional fracture are older; are likely to sustain another hip fracture after an incident hip fracture; often refracture early, particularly when the incident fracture is of the hip; and are often already on antiosteoporosis treatment. Therefore, it is important to identify these high-risk patients and offer a combined approach of prompt drug treatment through a systematic and specialist osteoporosis management team along with reducing any reversible falls risk factors.

Keywords

Falls Fracture Osteoporosis Fracture Liaison Service Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry 

References

  1. 1.
    Department of Health (2001) National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PolicyAndGuidance/HealthAndSocialCareTopics/ OlderPeoplesServices/fs/en Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scottish Executive (2002) Adding Life to Years: Report of the Expert Group on Healthcare of Older People. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/health/ alty.pdf
  3. 3.
    Northern Health and Social Services Board (2002) Ringing the Changes: A Strategy for Older People. Ballymena Northern Health and Social Services Board: http://www.nhssb.n-i.nhs.uk/publications/files/Elderly Care Strategy Summary.pdf
  4. 4.
    American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatric Society, and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention (2001) Guideline for the prevention of falls in older people. J Am Ger Soc 49:664–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC, Lamb SE, Cumming RJ, Rowe BH (2003) Intervention for preventing falls in elderly people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD000340Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidelines on the Prevention of Falls and Injuries in Older People, vol 21. London: National Institute for Clinical ExcellenceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2002) Prevention and management of hip fracture in older people. SIGN 56, http://www.sign.ac.uk
  8. 8.
    British Orthopaedic Association Blue Book (2003) The care of fragility fracture patients, http://www.boa.ac.uk/
  9. 9.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2003) Management of Osteoporosis. SIGN 71, http://www.sign.ac.uk
  10. 10.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2005) Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. Technology Appraisal 87 January 2005 http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=241341 t
  11. 11.
    Royal College of Physicians (2003) Osteoporosis. Clinical Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment. Update. London: Royal College of PhysiciansGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    All Party Parliamentary Osteoporosis Group (2004) Falling short. Delivering integrated falls and osteoporosis services in England, http://www.nos.org.uk/media/APPOG%20Report.pdf
  13. 13.
    Oliver D, McMurdo MET, Patel S (2005) Secondary prevention of falls and osteoporotic fractures in older people. BMJ 331:123–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Campbell AJ, Reinken J, Allan BC, et al. (1981) Falls in old age: a study of frequency and related clinical factors. Age Ageing 10:264–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prudham D, Evans JG (1981) Factors associated with falls in the elderly: a community study. Age Ageing 10:141–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF (1988) Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living within the community. N Engl J Med 319:1701–1707PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campbell AJ, Borrie MJ, Spears GF, et al. (1990) Circumstances and consequences of falls experienced by a community population 70 years and over during a prospective study. Age Ageing 337:1279–1284Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baker SP, Harvey AH (1995) Fall injuries in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1:501–512Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gryfe CI, Amies A, Ashley MJ (1987) A longitudinal study of falls in an elderly population. Incidence and morbidity. Age Ageing 6(4):201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tinetti ME (1987) Factors associated with serious injury during falls by ambulatory nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 35:644–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cumming RG, Salkeld G, Thomas M, Szonyi G (2000) Prospective study of the impact of fear of falling in activities of daily living, SF-36 scores and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 55:299–305Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tinetti ME, Mendes de Leon CF, Doucette JT, Baker DI (1994) Fear of falling and fall related efficacy in relationship to functioning community living elders. J Gerontol 49:140–147Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C (1999) Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353:93–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, de Laet C, et al. (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35:375–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta analysis of how well measures of bone density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fracture. BMJ 312:1245–1259Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klotzbeucher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al. (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a survey of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian CA (2003) The Fracture Liaison Service: success of a programme for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osteoporosis Management Systems, www.gismo-glasgow.comGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fracture Prevention Forum Steering Group; Gallacher SJ, McLellan AR, Keen R, et al. (2005) Strategies for the management of patients with new fragility fracture: a toolkit for selective case-finding, http://www.jbmedical.com/newtoolkit.pdf
  30. 30.
    Fighting Fractures Steering Group; Bainbridge P, Bayly J, Brown P, et al. (2006) Strategies for management of patients with prior fragility fractures: a toolkit for selective case-finding, http://www.jbmedical.com/priortoolkit.pdf
  31. 31.
    Brankin E, Mitchell C, Munro R (2005) Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme. Curr Med Res Opin 21:475–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Youm T, Koral KJ, Kummer FJ, et al. (1999) Do all hip fractures result from a fall? Am J Orthop 28:190–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harkness M, McQuillian CA, Gallacher SJ (2004) Adherence with anti-osteoporosis drug therapy – a comparison of a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) and Direct Access DXA Service. Poster 141 presented at the National Osteoporosis Society 10th Scientific Conference, November 28-December 1, 2004Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reginster JY, Seeman E, de Vernejoul MC, et al. (2005) Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2816–2822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harrington JT, Ste-Marie LG, Brandi ML, et al. (2004) Risedronate rapidly reduces the risk for nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 74:129–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire R. Langridge
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol McQuillian
    • 3
  • Walter S. Watson
    • 4
  • Barbara Walker
    • 4
  • Lara Mitchell
    • 1
  • Stephen J. Gallacher
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Medicine for the ElderlySouthern General HospitalGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of Medicine for the ElderlySouthern General HospitalGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Department of MedicineSouthern General HospitalGlasgowUK
  4. 4.Department of Nuclear MedicineSouthern General HospitalGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations