Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dual X-ray Absorptiometry: Cross-Calibration of a New Fan-Beam System

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high precision and stable calibration of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners have led to their widespread use in longitudinal studies for research and the follow-up of individual patients who are receiving treatment for osteoporosis. However, difficulties in maintaining the continuity of the bone mineral density (BMD) calibration scale can arise when an old DXA system is replaced by a newer model. We report the results of an in vivo cross-calibration study performed when a GE-Lunar Prodigy fan-beam system replaced a DPX-L pencil-beam scanner. Lumbar spine and hip DXA scans were performed in 133 patients (104 female, 29 male) attending long-term BMD monitoring. On average, lumbar spine BMD measurements on the two systems agreed closely, with Prodigy values 1% lower than those on the DPX-L. However, after allowing for this difference, the root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.037 g/cm2 was larger than in previous cross-calibration studies reported in the literature, and was 3 times the value expected from the precision of the BMD measurements. Mean femoral neck BMD also agreed closely between the two systems, although for Prodigy, the spread of measurements was 10% smaller than that for the DPX-L. For the trochanter and Ward’s triangle regions, mean BMD was 4% and 6% lower, respectively, on the Prodigy system, and the results were affected by a similar compression of the range of values. RMSE values were 0.037 g/cm2, 0.044 g/cm2, and 0.044 g/cm2, respectively, for the femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward’s triangle sites. When the high value of the RMSE was investigated, it was found that for lumbar spine BMD, patient body weight and the difference between the two systems in the percentage fat reported in the soft tissue reference region explained 40% of the variance. This enabled equations to be developed that significantly improved the agreement between scans performed on the two systems. Smaller improvements were obtained for the femur BMD measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. HK Genant K Engelke T Fuerst (1996) ArticleTitleNoninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res 11 707–730 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA28zptlI%3D Occurrence Handle8725168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DT Baran KG Faulkner HK Genant (1997) ArticleTitleDiagnosis and management of osteoporosis: guidelines for the utilization of bone densitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 61 433–440 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002239900362 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXnvVWjtbs%3D Occurrence Handle9383266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JA Kanis P Delmas P Burckhardt C Cooper D Torgerson InstitutionalAuthorNameon behalf of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease (1997) ArticleTitleGuidelines for diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7 390–406 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FktV2jtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9373575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. JA Kanis C-C Glüer (2000) ArticleTitleAn update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporos Int 11 192–202 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980050281 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3osVanug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10824234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. C Cooper G Campion LJ Melton (1992) ArticleTitleHip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2 285–289 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD2czovVE%3D Occurrence Handle1421796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M-A Schurch R Rizzoli B Mermillod H Vasey JP Michel J-P Bonjour (1996) ArticleTitleA prospective study on socio-economic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. Bone Miner Res 11 1935–1942 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC38rot1A%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. NF Ray JK Chan M Thamer LJ Melton (1997) ArticleTitleMedical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12 24–35 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA1c3ntl0%3D Occurrence Handle9240722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DM Black SR Cummings DB Karpf (1996) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of the effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348 1535–1541 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07088-2 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXisFCktQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8950879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. B Ettinger DM Black BH Mitlak (1999) ArticleTitleReduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA 282 637–645 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.282.7.637 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXlvVKqurg%3D Occurrence Handle10517716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. ST Harris NB Watts HK Genant (1999) ArticleTitleEffects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. JAMA 282 1344–1352 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.282.14.1344 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXmvFansr0%3D Occurrence Handle10527181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RM Neer CD Arnaud JR Zanchetta (2001) ArticleTitleEffect of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) fragment on spine and non-spine fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 344 1434–1441 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200105103441904 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXktVSgsbw%3D Occurrence Handle11346808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. InstitutionalAuthorNameRoyal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment. RCP London, England

    Google Scholar 

  13. InstitutionalAuthorNameWHO Technical Report Series 843 (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. World Health Organization Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  14. InstitutionalAuthorNameRoyal College of Physicians (2000) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment. Update on pharmacological interventions and an algorithm for management. RCP London, England

    Google Scholar 

  15. R Eastell (1998) ArticleTitleTreatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 338 736–746 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199803123381107 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXitFars70%3D Occurrence Handle9494151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. UA Liberman SR Weiss J Bröll (1995) ArticleTitleEffect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 333 1437–1443 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM199511303332201 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XkslehtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7477143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. RP Tonino PJ Meunier R Emkey (2000) ArticleTitleSkeletal benefits of alendronate: 7-year treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85 3109–3115 Occurrence Handle10.1210/jc.85.9.3109 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsVKru70%3D Occurrence Handle10999794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. SR Cummings DM Black DE Thompson (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fracture: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. JAMA 280 2077–2082 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.280.24.2077 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjsVWruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9875874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J-Y Reginster HW Minne OH Sorensen (2000) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11 83–91 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001980050010 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXhvFGgsr0%3D Occurrence Handle10663363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. CH Chesnut S Silverman K Andriano (2000) ArticleTitleA randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. Am J Med 109 267–276 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00490-3 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXms1Wku70%3D Occurrence Handle10996576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MR McClung P Geusens PD Miller (2001) ArticleTitleEffect of risedronate treatment on hip fracture risk in elderly women. N Engl J Med 344 333–340 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200102013440503 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXht1Wlu7g%3D Occurrence Handle11172164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. IR Reid JP Brown P Burckhardt (2002) ArticleTitleIntravenous zolendronic acid in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med 346 653–661 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa011807 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XhsFOjsrw%3D Occurrence Handle11870242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. C-C Gluer KG Faulkner MJ Estilo K Engelke J Rosin HK Genant (1993) ArticleTitleQuality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact. Osteoporos Int 3 227–235 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD3czntFc%3D Occurrence Handle8400603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. KG Faulkner MR McClung (1995) ArticleTitleQuality control of DXA instruments in multicenter trials. Osteoporos Int 5 218–227 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2MzhtVQ%3D Occurrence Handle7492859

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. HK Genant S Grampp C-C Glüer (1994) ArticleTitleUniversal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 9 1503–1514

    Google Scholar 

  26. KG Faulkner C-C Gluer MJ Estilo HK Genant (1993) ArticleTitleCross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR-1000/W to a QDR-2000. Calcif Tissue Int 52 79–84 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1cvovFQ%3D Occurrence Handle8443695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. GM Blake JC Parker FMA Buxton I Fogelman (1993) ArticleTitleDual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans. Br J Radiol 66 902–906 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD3srpvFQ%3D Occurrence Handle8220974

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. RB Mazess B Collick J Trempe HS Barden JA Hanson (1989) ArticleTitlePerformance evaluation of a dual-energy X-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 44 228–232 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC2M7gvF0%3D Occurrence Handle2493329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. RB Mazess JA Hanson R Payne R Nord M Wilson (2000) ArticleTitleAxial and total-body bone densitometry using a narrow-angle fan-beam. Osteoporos Int 11 158–166 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3lsVentw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10793875

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. WA Kalender D Felsenberg HK Genant M Fischer J Dequeker J Reeve (1995) ArticleTitleThe European Spine Phantom—a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and OCT. Eur J Radiol 20 83–92 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0720-048X(95)00631-Y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2c3osVY%3D Occurrence Handle7588873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. RB Mazess JA Tempe JP Bisek JA Hanson (1991) ArticleTitleCalibration of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for bone density. J Bone Miner Res 6 799–806 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2C2M7otFE%3D Occurrence Handle1785372

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. J Hanson (1997) ArticleTitleStandardization of femur BMD [letter]. J Bone Miner Res 12 1316–1317 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3czjvFE%3D Occurrence Handle9258764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. DG Altman (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  34. GM Blake (1996) ArticleTitleReplacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading. Calcif Tissue Int 59 1–5 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002239900075 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28Xkt12mtL4%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. GM Blake I Fogelman (1995) ArticleTitleReplacing dual X-ray absorptiometry scanners: cross-calibration of a new multidetector array. J Bone Miner Res 10 IssueID(Suppl 1 S267

    Google Scholar 

  36. SA Steel J Thorpe (2002) ArticleTitleThe GE-Lunar Prodigy: in vivo precision and cross-calibration. Calcif Tissue Int 71 277–278

    Google Scholar 

  37. HH Bolotin H Sievanen JL Grashuis JW Kuiper TLN Jarvinen (2001) ArticleTitleInaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation. J Bone Miner Res 16 417–426 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ht1WltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11204442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. CR Wilson GF Carrera J Bergersen (2002) ArticleTitleThe effect of patient weight on BMD measurement precision. Calcif Tissuer Int 71 281–282

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Blake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake, G.M., Harrison, E.J. & Adams, J.E. Dual X-ray Absorptiometry: Cross-Calibration of a New Fan-Beam System. Calcif Tissue Int 75, 7–14 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-004-0169-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-004-0169-y

Keywords

Navigation