Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Matrix Concentration of Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) is Negatively Associated with Biomechanical Properties of Human Tibial Cancellous Bone Within Individual Subjects

  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), abundant in bone matrix, is believed to play an important role during bone development and remodeling. To our knowledge, however, few studies have addressed the relationship between the concentration of IGF-I in bone matrix and the biomechanical properties of bone tissue. In this study, forty-five cylindrical specimens of cancellous bone were harvested from six human tibiae and scanned using microcomputed tomography (μCT). The bone volume fraction (BV/TV) was calculated from three-dimensional (3D) μCT images. Mechanical tests were then performed on a servohydraulic testing system to determine the strength and stiffness of cancellous bone. Following mechanical testing, the concentration of IGF-I in bone matrix was measured by using an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA). Within each subject, the concentration of IGF-I in bone matrix had significant (P < 0.01) negative correlations with the bone volume fraction, strength, and stiffness of cancellous bone. In particular, the anterior quadrant of the proximal tibia was significantly (P < 0.02) greater in IGF-I matrix concentration and marginally significantly lower in strength (P = 0.053) and stiffness (P = 0.059) than the posterior quadrant. The negative correlations between the cancellous bone matrix concentration of IGF-I and cancellous bone biomechanical properties within subjects found in this study may help us understand the variation of the biomechanical properties of cancellous bone in proximal human tibiae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T Alliston R Derynck (2000) Transforming growth factor beta in skeletal development and maintenance E Canalis (Eds) Skeletal growth factors Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 233–249

    Google Scholar 

  2. CA Conover (2000) Insulin-like growth factors and the skeleton E Canalis (Eds) Skeletal growth factors Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  3. A Wakisaka H Tanaka J Barnes CT Liang (1998) ArticleTitleEffect of locally infused IGF-I on femoral gene expression and bone turnover activity in old rats J Bone Miner Res 13 13–19 Occurrence Handle9443785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. T Seck B Scheppach S Scharla I Diel WF Blum H Bismar G Schmid B Krempien R Ziegler J Pfeilschifter (1998) ArticleTitleConcentration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and -II in iliac crest bone matrix from pre- and postmenopausal women: relationship to age, menopause, bone turnover, bone volume, and circulating IGFs J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83 2331–2337 Occurrence Handle10.1210/jc.83.7.2331 Occurrence Handle9661604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. G Zhao MC Monier-Faugere MC Langub Z Geng T Nakayama JW Pike SD Chernausek CJ Rosen LR Donahue HH Malluche JA Fagin TL Clemens (2000) ArticleTitleTargeted overexpression of insulin-like growth factor I to osteoblasts of transgenic mice: increased trabecular bone volume without increased osteoblast proliferation Endocrinology 141 2674–2682 Occurrence Handle10.1210/en.141.7.2674 Occurrence Handle10875273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D Bikle S Majumdar A Laib L Powell-Braxton C Rosen W Beamer E Nauman C Leary B Halloran (2001) ArticleTitleThe skeletal structure of insulin-like growth factor I-deficient mice J Bone Miner Res 16 2320–2329 Occurrence Handle11760848

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. S Mohan C Richman R Guo Y Amaar LR Donahue J Wergedal DJ Baylink (2003) ArticleTitleInsulin-like growth factor regulates peak bone mineral density in mice by both growth hormone-dependent and -independent mechanisms Endocrinology 144 929–936 Occurrence Handle10.1210/en.2002-220948 Occurrence Handle12586770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RB Martin DB Burr NA Sharkey (1998) Skeletal tissue mechanics Springer New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y Harada HW Wevers TD Cooke (1988) ArticleTitleDistribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia J Arthroplasty 3 167–175 Occurrence Handle3397747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JC Behrens PS Walker H Shoji (1974) ArticleTitleVariations in strength and structure of cancellous bone at the knee J Biomech 7 201–207 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(74)90010-4 Occurrence Handle4844327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. RB Ashman JY Rho CH Turner (1989) ArticleTitleAnatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia J Biomech 22 895–900 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(89)90073-0 Occurrence Handle2693453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. I Hvid (1988) ArticleTitleMechanical strength of trabecular bone at the knee Danish Med Bull 35 345–365 Occurrence Handle3048922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. I Hvid SL Hansen (1985) ArticleTitleTrabecular bone strength patterns at the proximal tibial epiphysis J Orthop Res 3 464–472 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jor.1100030409 Occurrence Handle4067705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. SA Goldstein DL Wilson DA Sonstegard LS Matthews (1983) ArticleTitleThe mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location J Biomech 16 965–969 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(83)90097-0 Occurrence Handle6671987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J Pfeilschifter I Diel B Scheppach A Bretz R Krempien J Erdmann G Schmid N Reske H Bismar T Seek B Krempien R Ziegler (1998) ArticleTitleConcentration of transforming growth factor beta in human bone tissue: relationship to age, menopause, bone turnover, and bone volume J Bone Miner Res 13 716–730 Occurrence Handle9556072

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. J Pfeilschifter J Erdmann S Storch R Ziegler M Weinreb (1999) ArticleTitleChanges in the concentration of insulin-like growth factor I and transforming growth factor beta 1 in rat femoral bone during growth Calcif Tissue Int 64 78–82 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002239900582 Occurrence Handle9868288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J Pfeilschifter F Laukhuf B Muller-Beckmann WF Blum T Pfister R Ziegler (1995) ArticleTitleParathyroid hormone increases the concentration of insulin-like growth factor-I and transforming growth factor beta 1 in rat bone J Clin Invest 96 767–774 Occurrence Handle7635970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. V Patel AS Issever A Burghardt A Laib M Ries S Majumdar (2003) ArticleTitleMicroCT evaluation of normal and osteoarthritic bone structure in human knee specimens J OrthopRes 21 6–13 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00093-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. FJ Hou SM Lang SJ Hoshaw DA Reimann DP Fyhrie (1998) ArticleTitleHuman vertebral body apparent and hard tissue stiffness J Biomech 31 1009–1015 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00110-9 Occurrence Handle9880057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DP Fyhrie SM Lang SJ Hoshaw MB Schaffler RF Kuo (1995) ArticleTitleHuman vertebral cancellous bone surface distribution Bone 17 287–291 Occurrence Handle10.1016/8756-3282(95)00218-3 Occurrence Handle8541143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DP Fyhrie NL Fazzalari R Goulet SA Goldstein (1993) ArticleTitleDirect calculation of the surface-to-volume ratio for human cancellous bone J Biomech 26 955–967 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(93)90057-L Occurrence Handle8349720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DR Carter WC Hayes (1977) ArticleTitleThe compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure J Bone Joint Surg Am 59 954–962 Occurrence Handle561786

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. F Linde I Hvid (1989) ArticleTitleThe effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens J Biomech 22 485–490 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(89)90209-1 Occurrence Handle2777823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. TM Keaveny XE Guo EF Wachtel TA McMahon WC Hayes (1994) ArticleTitleTrabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains J Biomech 27 1127–1136 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9290(94)90053-1 Occurrence Handle7929462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. TM Keaveny TP Pinilla RP Crawford DL Kopperdahl A Lou (1997) ArticleTitleSystematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone J Orthop Res 15 101–110 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jor.1100150115 Occurrence Handle9066533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DP Fyhrie D Vashishth (2000) ArticleTitleBone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension Bone 26 169–173 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00246-X Occurrence Handle10678412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. YN Yeni DP Fyhrie (2001) ArticleTitleFinite element calculated uniaxial apparent stiffness is a consistent predictor of uniaxial apparent strength in human vertebral cancellous bone tested with different boundary conditions J Biomech 34 1649–1654 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00155-5 Occurrence Handle11716868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. A Grimberg P Cohen (2000) ArticleTitleRole of insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins in growth control and carcinogenesis J Cell Physiol 183 1–9 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200004)183:1<1::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-J Occurrence Handle10699960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. JM Chan MJ Stampfer E Giovannucci PH Gann J Ma P Wilkinson CH Hennekens M Pollak (1998) ArticleTitlePlasma insulin-like growth factor-I and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study Science 279 563–566 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.279.5350.563 Occurrence Handle9438850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. RD Finkelman S Mohan JC Jennings AK Taylor S Jepsen DJ Baylink (1990) ArticleTitleQuantitation of growth factors IGF-I, SGF/IGF-II, and TGF-beta in human dentin J Bone Miner Res 5 717–723 Occurrence Handle2396498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. JM Bland DG Altman (1995) ArticleTitleCalculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2—Correlation between subjects BMJ 310 633 Occurrence Handle7703752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. JM Bland DG Altman (1995) ArticleTitleCalculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—Correlation within subjects BMJ 310 446 Occurrence Handle7873953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. JP Yang ER Bogoch TD Woodside TC Hearn (1997) ArticleTitleStiffness of trabecular bone of the tibial plateau in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of the knee J Arthroplasty 12 798–803 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90011-5 Occurrence Handle9355010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Akamatsu Y, Koshino T, Saito T, Wada J (1997) Changes in osteosclerosis of the osteoarthritic knee after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 207–214

  35. MM Petersen C Olsen JB Lauritzen B Lund A Hede (1996) ArticleTitleLate changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia following total or partial medial meniscectomy A randomized study. J Orthop Res 14 16–21 Occurrence Handle10.1002/jor.1100140105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Day JS, Sumner DR, Waarsing JH, Weinans H (2004) Inter-individual and gender differences in bone adaptation strategy. In: Transactions of the 50th Annual Meeting of Orthopaedic Research Society. San Francisco, p 400

  37. T Seck A Bretz R Krempien B Krempien R Ziegler J Pfeilschifter (1999) ArticleTitleAge-related changes in insulin-like growth factor I and II in human femoral cortical bone: lack of correlation with bone mass Bone 24 387–393 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00186-0 Occurrence Handle10221551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. P Szulc MO Joly-Pharaboz F Marchand PD Delmas (2004) ArticleTitleInsulin-like growth factor I is a determinant of hip bone mineral density in men less than 60 years of age: MINOS study Calcif Tissue Int 74 322–329 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00223-003-0090-9 Occurrence Handle15255068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. TK Sampath AH Reddi (1984) ArticleTitleDistribution of bone inductive proteins in mineralized and demineralized extracellular matrix Biochem Biophys Res Commun 119 949–954 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-291X(84)90865-9 Occurrence Handle6712678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. DG Altman JM Bland (1997) ArticleTitleStatistics notes Units of analysis. BMJ 314 1874

    Google Scholar 

  41. JH Zar (1999) Biostatistical analysis Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  42. MA Hardy (1993) Regression with dummy variables Sage Publications Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  43. P Armitage G Berry JNS Matthews (2002) Statistical methods in medical research Blackwell Science Oxford; Maiden, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AR40776, AR44712, AR47434, and AR049343.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. N. Dong.

Appendix

Appendix

A.1 Correlation coefficients with repeated observations

Because there were multiple specimens of cancellous bone from each subject (i.e., pseudoreplication), it could be misleading to perform statistical analyses by combining all cancellous bone specimens from several subjects and then calculating the correlation as if the data were a simple sample. Although forty-five cylindrical specimens of cancellous bone were harvested, there were only six actual independent observations, which was equal to the number of subjects used in the present study. This is similar to the problem of multiple physiological measurements from individual patients as discussed by Altman and Bland [40].

A.2 Correlation within subjects

It is sometimes useful to introduce additional variables into a regression model, to account for the effects of nominal scale variables (i.e., categorical variables such as subject) on the response variable [41].

For example, we might be considering fitting the model

$$ {\rm{BV/TV = a}}\,{\rm{ + }}\,{\rm{b}}\;{\rm{IGF - I}} $$
(1)

where BV/TV is the bone volume fraction of cancellous bone, IGF-I is the concentration of IGF-I in bone matrix, a is the intercept, and b is the slope. However, this model does not take account of the variability between subjects.

Therefore, we might be interested in determining the effect of subject variations on BV/TV. There are six levels of the nominal scale variable (i.e., six subjects). Therefore, five dummies are required for the regression model [4143]. Our regression model could then be expanded to

$$ {\rm{BV/TV}}\,{\rm{ = a}}\,{\rm{ + b IGF - I + d}}_{\rm{1}} {\rm{ D}}_{{\rm{1 }}} {\rm{ + d}}_{\rm{2}} {\rm{ D}}_{{\rm{2 }}} {\rm{ + d}}_{\rm{3}} {\rm{ D}}_{\rm{3}} {\rm{ + d}}_{\rm{4}} {\rm{ D}}_{{\rm{ 4}}} {\rm{ + d}}_{\rm{5}} {\rm{ D}}_{\rm{5}} $$
(2)

where D1, D2, D3, D4, and D5 are dummy variables that account for average inter-individual variation. The five dummy variables can be used to represent six levels of a categorical variable (subject). The use of these dummy variables accounts for pseudoreplication and will yield significantly more accurate predictions of the dependent variable than will the preceding model without dummy variables (Equation 1). The method is also known as analysis of covariance and is equivalent to fitting parallel lines through each subject’s data [43].

We can make use of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) table associated with the multiple regression model [32]. The residual sum of squares in the table represents the variations about those lines fitted to each subject. We remove the variation due to the subjects and express the variation in the bone volume fraction to the matrix concentration of IGF-I as a proportion of what remains (Sum of squares for IGF-I)/(Sum of square for IGF-I + Residual sum of squares). This proportion is also called the coefficient of determination (R2) for a multiple regression. The P value is calculated from the F test in the associated analysis of variance table.

A.3 Correlation between subjects

If we want to know whether subjects with high average values of IGF-I concentration also tend to have high average values of biomechanical properties, we can use the correlation between the subject means of the independent and dependent variables. We can calculate the mean values of IGF-I concentration and the biomechanical properties for each of six subjects. The 45 pairs of measurements from which these means were calculated were given in the Figures 24. Here we are interested in whether the average IGF-I concentration for a subject is related to the subject’s average biomechanical properties.

We can calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Spearman correlation coefficient for the mean concentration of IGF-I in bone matrix and the average biomechanical properties by using simple linear correlation and rank correlation analysis, respectively [41].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, X.N., Yeni, Y.N., Zhang, B. et al. Matrix Concentration of Insulin-like Growth Factor I (IGF-I) is Negatively Associated with Biomechanical Properties of Human Tibial Cancellous Bone Within Individual Subjects. Calcif Tissue Int 77, 37–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-004-0140-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-004-0140-y

Keywords

Navigation