Skip to main content
Log in

An fMRI-based investigation of the effects of odors on the functional connectivity network underlying the working memory

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the human brain, the regions responsible for emotion processing, motivation, and memory are heavily influenced by olfaction, whose neural pathway is directly exposed to the outer world. In this study, we used fMRI to examine how different olfactory conditions might affect the functional connectivity circuit underlying working memory in the brain. To this end, 30 adults (aged 20–35), 13 males and 17 females, with high educational levels were chosen. Participants were screened for potential olfactory issues before undergoing the Sniffin’ sticks test, which was part of the inclusion criteria. Before imaging, each participant was given the required level of training and was then asked to complete four olfactory tests involving pleasant and unpleasant odors, air, and null stimulation. The results of Seed-based analysis suggested a function connection between the inferior parietal region and the left frontal pole region upon olfactory stimulation with vanilla scent in contrast to null stimulation in this comparison, ROI-based analysis revealed an inverse synchronous among the entorhinal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Both dlPFC and hippocampus were involved in olfactory discrimination between two different stimulants. Our findings indicate the presence of inverse correlations between several regions associated with olfaction and working memory, with pleasant scents leaving a stronger impact on the working memory-related areas, particularly the inferior parietal region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data of this study will be available on request.

Abbreviations

SNR:

Signal Noise Ratio

ms:

Milliseconds

deg:

Degree

fMRI:

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

TR:

Time Repetition

TE:

Echo Time

TI:

Inversion Time

FOV:

Field Of View

BOLD:

Blood oxygen level-dependent contrast

MR:

Magnetic Resonance

BET:

Brain Extraction Tool

QC:

Quality Control

SPM:

Statistical Parametric Mapping

FSL:

FMRIB Software Library

FMRIB:

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain

MNI:

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

CONN:

Connectivity

FDR:

False Discovery Rate

OFC:

Olfactory Frontal Cortex

rCBF:

Regional Cerebral Blood Flow

DLPFC:

Dorso-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

OT:

Odor Threshold test

OI:

Odor Identification

OD:

Odor Discrimination

References

  • Anderson AK et al (2003) Dissociated neural representations of intensity and valence in human olfaction. Nat Neurosci 6(2):196–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MC, Bunce JG, Barbas H (2016) Prefrontal–hippocampal pathways underlying inhibitory control over memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 134:145–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bensafi M et al (2002) Autonomic nervous system responses to odours: the role of pleasantness and arousal. Chem Senses 27(8):703–709

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burwell RD, Amaral DG (1998) Cortical afferents of the perirhinal, postrhinal, and entorhinal cortices of the rat. J Comp Neurol 398(2):179–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson H et al (2020) Sustained effects of pleasant and unpleasant smells on resting state brain activity. Cortex 132:386–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chikazoe J et al (2014) Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals. Nat Neurosci 17(8):1114–1122

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chu S, Downes JJ (2002) Proust nose best: odors are better cues of autobiographical memory. Mem Cognit 30(4):511–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dade LA et al (2001) Working memory in another dimension: functional imaging of human olfactory working memory. NeuroImage 14(3):650–660

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dahmani L et al (2020) Fimbria-fornix volume is associated with spatial memory and olfactory identification in humans. Front Syst Neurosci 13:87

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL (2000) Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation–a possible prelude to violence. Science 289(5479):591–594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlichman H, Halpern JN (1988) Affect and memory: effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories. J Personal Soc Psychol 55(5):769

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersche K et al (2005) Abnormal frontal activations related to decision-making in current and former amphetamine and opiate dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology 180(4):612–623

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorilli J et al (2024) Neural correlates of object identity and reward outcome in the sensory cortical-hippocampal hierarchy: coding of motivational information in perirhinal cortex. Cereb Cortex 34(2):bhae002

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ, Carmichael L (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems, vol 2. Houghton Mifflin Boston

  • Golkar A et al (2012) Distinct contributions of the dorsolateral prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex during emotion regulation. PLoS ONE 7(11):e48107

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried JA et al (2002) Functional heterogeneity in human olfactory cortex: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 22(24):10819–10828

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gulas CS, Bloch PH (1995) Right under our noses: ambient scent and consumer responses. J Bus Psychol 10(1):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton PB, Henley TB (1993) Cognitive and affective components of stimuli presented in three modes. Bull Psychon Soc 31(6):595–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T et al (1997) Sniffin’sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem Senses 22(1):39–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T et al (2012) Olfactory processing in children and young adults. Chemosens Percept 5(1):128–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys GF, Jackson RL, Lambon MA, Ralph (2020) Overarching principles and dimensions of the functional organization in the inferior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 30(11):5639–5653

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaheni H et al (2024) Intra and inter-regional functional connectivity of the human brain due to Task-Evoked fMRI Data classification through CNN & LSTM. Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Katata K et al (2009) Functional MRI of regional brain responses to ‘pleasant’and ‘unpleasant’odors. Acta Otolaryngol 129(sup562):85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kier EL et al (1997) Embryology of the human fetal hippocampus: MR imaging, anatomy, and histology. Am J Neuroradiol 18(3):525–532

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura T, Matsuura R (2021) Changes in brain activity induced by the N-back task are related to improved dual-task performance. Behav Brain Res 396:112881

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinhans NM et al (2019) FMRI correlates of olfactory processing in typically-developing school-aged children. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 283:67–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Köster EP, Møller P, Mojet J (2014) A Misfit theory of spontaneous conscious odor perception (MITSCOP): reflections on the role and function of odor memory in everyday life. Front Psychol 5:64

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krain AL et al (2006) Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: a meta-analysis of decision-making. NeuroImage 32(1):477–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li TQ et al (2000) Changes in baseline cerebral blood flow in humans do not influence regional cerebral blood flow response to photic stimulation. J Magn Reson Imaging 12(5):757–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton PA, White JA, Eichenbaum H (2007) Disambiguation of overlapping experiences by neurons in the medial entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci 27(21):5787–5795

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lorig TS (1992) Cognitive and non-cognitive effects of odour exposure: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence The psychology and biology of perfume,: pp. 161–173

  • Miller G, Galanter E, Pribram K (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Henry Holt and Co

  • Milner B (1965) Visually-guided maze learning in man: effects of bilateral hippocampal, bilateral frontal, and unilateral cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia 3(4):317–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandya DN, Barnes CL, Perecman E (1987) The frontal lobes revisited E. Perecman (Ed.),: pp. 41–72

  • Porada DK et al (2021) Trimodal processing of complex stimuli in inferior parietal Cortex is modality-independent. Cortex 139:198–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ross RS et al (2013) Role of the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex during the disambiguation of social cues in working memory Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(4): pp. 900–915

  • Saive A-L, Royet J-P, Plailly J (2014) A review on the neural bases of episodic odor memory: from laboratory-based to autobiographical approaches. Front Behav Neurosci 8:240

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schonberg T, Fox CR, Poldrack RA (2011) Mind the gap: bridging economic and naturalistic risk-taking with cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci 15(1):11–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shackman AJ et al (2009) Right dorsolateral prefrontal cortical activity and behavioral inhibition. Psychol Sci 20(12):1500–1506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg ER, Crowley AE, Henderson PW (1996) Improving the store environment: do olfactory cues affect evaluations and behaviors? J Mark 60(2):67–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire LR (1992) Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev 99(2):195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki WA, Amaral DG (1994) Topographic organization of the reciprocal connections between the monkey entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices. J Neurosci 14(3):1856–1877

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Hamakawa M, Okamoto T (2018) Olfactory modulation of colour working memory: how does citrus-like smell influence the memory of orange colour? PLoS ONE 13(9):e0203876

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Torske A et al (2022) Localizing the human brain response to olfactory stimulation: a meta-analytic approach. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews 134:104512

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tzourio-Mazoyer N et al (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage 15(1):273–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webler RD et al (2022) DLPFC stimulation alters working memory related activations and performance: an interleaved TMS-fMRI study. Brain Stimulation

  • Wrobel BB, Leopold DA (2004) Clinical assessment of patients with smell and taste disorders. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 37(6):1127–1142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto DJ et al (2015) Influence of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum on risk avoidance in addiction: a mediation analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 149:10–17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zavitsanou AM, Drigas A (2021) Attention and Working Memory. Int J Recent Contrib Eng Sci IT 9(1):81–91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the National Brain Mapping Laboratory (NBML) for MRI acquisition aspects and also the IUMS Medical Physics Department for the Olfactory test process.

Funding

This work was supported by the Iran University of Medical Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Faezeh Heidari: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Mohammad Bagher Shiran: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. Asra Karami: Writing – review & editing. haniyeh kaheni: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. Arash Zare-Sadeghi: Visualization, Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arash Zare-Sadeghi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1400.442).

Informed consent

Informed consent was acquired from all subjects who participated in this study.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Bill J Yates.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heidari, F., Shiran, M.B., kaheni, H. et al. An fMRI-based investigation of the effects of odors on the functional connectivity network underlying the working memory. Exp Brain Res 242, 1561–1571 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06848-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06848-1

Keywords

Navigation