Robotic devices can be engaged actively or passively to unload arm weight or impose additional loading. The conditions of variable loading and unloading offer an opportunity to investigate motor performance of the arm affected by a stroke. The objective of this study was to investigate the interactive effects of the proximal arm impairment and passive weight compensation on shoulder flexion performance in the sagittal plane after stroke. Twenty-eight participants (age 57 ± 10 years, 21/28 ≤ 6 weeks post-stroke) played a shoulder flexion game under five standardized weight compensation configurations provided by the Armeo®Spring exoskeleton. Percent of targets acquired and root mean square error were calculated to derive three behavioral and three kinematic outcomes: total score/overall error (loading/unloading conditions and five configurations combined), loading and unloading score/error (five configurations combined), and weight compensation configuration score/error for each setting separately. The total score was positively related and the overall error was negatively related to proximal arm impairment (Fugl–Meyer upper extremity movement subscale, maximum 30, FM30). The unloading score (80 ± 27%) and error (5 ± 4°) were significantly better than the loading score (45 ± 38%, p < 0.01) and error (14± 9°, p < 0.01) with improvements most pronounced in the mid-range of FM30 (4–15 points). The configuration scores/error gradually improved with each increment in unloading for the mid-range FM30 participants, while only error improved in those with low FM30. In conclusion, shoulder flexion performance depends on proximal arm impairment, but it is also influenced by the degree of unloading/loading provided, particularly among individuals with moderate paresis after stroke.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The code generated during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Adomavičienė A, Daunoravičienė K, Kubilius R et al (2019) Influence of new technologies on post-stroke rehabilitation: a comparison of armeo spring to the kinect system. Medicina (B Aires) 55:98. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55040098
Bartolo M, De Nunzio AM, Sebastiano F et al (2014) Arm weight support training improves functional motor outcome and movement smoothness after stroke. Funct Neurol 29:15–21
Beer RF, Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Dewald JPA (2007) Impact of gravity loading on post-stroke reaching and its relationship to weakness. Muscle Nerve 36:242–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20817
Bertani R, Melegari C, De Cola MC et al (2017) Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2995-5
Chan IHL, Fong KNK, Chan DYL et al (2016) Effects of arm weight support training to promote recovery of upper limb function for subacute patients after stroke with different levels of arm impairments. Biomed Res Int 2016:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9346374
Colomer C, Baldoví A, Torromé S et al (2013) Efficacy of Armeo®Spring during the chronic phase of stroke. Study in mild to moderate cases of hemiparesis. Neurol (English Edition) 28:261–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2012.04.017
Coscia M, Cheung VCK, Tropea P et al (2014) The effect of arm weight support on upper limb muscle synergies during reaching movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_23
Dixit S, Tedla JS (2019) Effectiveness of robotics in improving upper extremity functions among people with neurological dysfunction: a systematic review. Int J Neurosci 129:369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2018.1536051
Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, Dewald JPA (2008) Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307313509
Ellis MD, Sukal-Moulton T, Dewald JPA (2009) Progressive shoulder abduction loading is a crucial element of arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:862–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309332927
Ellis MD, Drogos J, Carmona C et al (2012) Neck rotation modulates flexion synergy torques, indicating an ipsilateral reticulospinal source for impairment in stroke. J Neurophysiol 108:3096–3104. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01030.2011.-The
Ellis MD, Carmona C, Drogos J, Dewald JPA (2018) Progressive abduction loading therapy with horizontal-plane viscous resistance targeting weakness and flexion synergy to treat upper limb function in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized clinical Trial. Front Neurol 9:71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00071
Franceschini M, Goffredo M, Pournajaf S et al (2018) Predictors of activities of daily living outcomes after upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute stroke patients. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193235
Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I et al (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7:13–31
Goffredo M, Mazzoleni S, Gison A et al (2019) Kinematic parameters for tracking patient progress during upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation: an observational study on subacute stroke subjects. Hindawi Appl Bionics Biomech 2019:12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4251089
Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2009) A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23:505–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968308331148
Maier M, Ballester BR, Verschure PFMJ (2019) Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074
McPherson JG, Chen A, Ellis MD et al (2018) Progressive recruitment of contralesional cortico-reticulospinal pathways drives motor impairment post stroke. J Physiol 596:1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274968
Oosterwijk AM, Nieuwenhuis MK, van der Schans CP, Mouton LJ (2018) Shoulder and elbow range of motion for the performance of activities of daily living: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract 34:505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1422206
Perry BE, Evans EK, Stokic DS (2017) Weight compensation characteristics of Armeo®Spring exoskeleton: implications for clinical practice and research. J Neuroeng Rehabil 14:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0227-0
Roorda LD, Houwink A, Smits W et al (2011) Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the stroke upper lim. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92:214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.034
Runnalls KD, Ortega-Auriol P, McMorland AJC et al (2019) Effects of arm weight support on neuromuscular activation during reaching in chronic stroke patients. Exp Brain Res 237:3391–3408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05687-9
Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S et al (2006) Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14:378–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.881553
Schweighofer N, Wang C, Mottet D et al (2018) Dissociating motor learning from recovery in exoskeleton training post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 15:89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0428-1
Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JPA (2007) Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res 183:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1029-6
Taveggia G, Borboni A, Salvi L et al (2016) Efficacy of robot-assisted rehabilitation for the functional recovery of the upper limb in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 52:767–773
Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, Van Wegen EEH et al (2017) Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31:107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316666957
Weber LM, Stein J (2018) The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: a narrative review. NeuroRehabilitation 43:99–110. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172408
Wissel J, Schelosky LD, Scott J et al (2010) Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial. J Neurol 257:1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5463-1
This work was supported in part by the Wilson Research Foundation affiliated with Methodist Rehabilitation Center (Jackson, MS), The Yerger NeuroRobotics Research Fund, and The H.F. McCarty, Jr. Family Foundation Fund for Stroke Research. We are grateful to Elyse Guice and Hayes Walker for their assistance with data processing for this study.
This work was supported in part by the Wilson Research Foundation affiliated with Methodist Rehabilitation Center (Jackson, MS), The Yerger NeuroRobotics Research Fund, and The H.F. McCarty, Jr. Family Foundation Fund for Stroke Research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Communicated by Bill J Yates.
About this article
Cite this article
Perry, B., Sivak, J. & Stokic, D. Providing unloading by exoskeleton improves shoulder flexion performance after stroke. Exp Brain Res 239, 1539–1549 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06070-3
- Exoskeleton device
- Upper extremity