Common social behaviors, such as having a conversation, dancing, or playing a team sport, require precise interpersonal coordination of action. One question that emerges in research on interpersonal coordination is to what extent individuals implicitly mimic the spatial characteristics of movements for tasks that emphasize movement timing. To investigate this question, we conducted two experiments using an interpersonal synchronization-continuation tapping paradigm in which pairs of individuals tapped with their index finger on a table in synchrony with an auditory metronome and then continued tapping at the same tempo when the metronome stopped. Pairs of individuals tapped either together with the instruction to maintain synchrony with each other (interpersonal tapping) or tapped alone (solo tapping). Solo tapping conditions either occurred with their tapping partner present in the testing room (Experiment 1) or absent (Experiment 2). We used motion capture to examine both the spatial and temporal aspects of movement dynamics during task performance. In both experiments, participants implicitly mimicked subtle aspects of spatial elements of their partner’s movements. The extent of finger extension (tap amplitude) and, in Experiment 1, duration of finger contact with the surface (dwell time) were correlated between tapping partners when they tapped together. In some cases, this spatial mimicry extended to solo tapping conditions, but only during solo tapping conditions that followed the interpersonal tapping task, and, to a lesser degree, when solo tapping after having observed the other participant solo tapping.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and material
Data are available upon request.
Balasubramaniam R, Wing AM, Daffertshofer A (2004) Keeping with the beat: movement trajectories contribute to movement timing. Exp Brain Res 159(1):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2066-z
Bernieri FJ, Rosenthal R (1991) Interpersonal coordination: behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In: Feldman RS, Rimé B (eds) Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior: studies in emotion and social interaction. Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, Cambridge, England and Paris, France, pp 401–432
Blakemore SJ, Frith C (2005) The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 43(2):260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.012
Ceux T, Buekers MJ, Montagne G (2003) The effects of enhanced visual feedback on human synchronization. Neurosci Lett 349(2):103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00799-7
Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception–behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(6):893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1243
Drewing K, Hennings M, Aschersleben G (2002) The contribution of tactile reafference to temporal regularity during bimanual finger tapping. Psychol Res 66(1):60–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260100074
Georgiou I, Becchio C, Glover S, Castiello U (2007) Different action patterns for cooperative and competitive behaviour. Cognition 102(3):415–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.008
Helmuth LL, Ivry RB (1996) When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22(2):278–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-15126.96.36.1998
Heyes C (2001) Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cogn Sci 5(6):253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01661-2
Hove MJ, Keller PE (2010) Spatiotemporal relations and movement trajectories in visuomotor synchronization. Music Percept 28(1):15–26. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.28.1.15
Hove MJ, Risen JL (2009) It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Soc Cogn 27(6):949–960. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
Ivry R, Corcos DM (1993) Slicing the variability pie: component analysis of coordination and motor dysfunction. In: Newell KM, Corcos DM (eds) Variability and motor control. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 415–447
Ivry RB, Hazeltine RE (1995) Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-15188.8.131.52
Ivry RB, Keele SW, Diener HC (1988) Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution. Exp Brain Res 73:167–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00279670
Keele SW, Pokorny RA, Corcos DM, Ivry R (1985) Do perception and motor production share common timingmechanisms: a correlational analysis. Acta Psychol 60:173–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(85)90054-x
Konvalinka I, Vuust P, Roepstorff A, Frith CD (2010) Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. Q J Exp Psychol 63(11):2220–2230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.497843
Okano M, Shinya M, Kudo K (2017) Paired synchronous rhythmic finger tapping without an external timing cue shows greater speed increases relative to those for solo tapping. Sci Rep 7(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43987
Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752551
Rens G, Davare M (2019) Observation of both skilled and erroneous object lifting can improve predictive force scaling in the observer. Front Hum Neurosci 13:373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00373
Repp BH (2005) Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature. Psychon Bull Rev 12(6):969–992. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206433
Repp BH, Su YH (2013) Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychon Bull Rev 20(3):403–452. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2
Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Isenhower RW, Goodman JR, Schmidt RC (2007) Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum Mov Sci 26(6):867–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Schmidt RC (2005) Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(1):62–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049034
Scheflen AE (1964) The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry 27(4):316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403
Schmidt RC, O’Brien B (1997) Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecol Psychol 9(3):189–206. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0903_2
Stevens LT (1886) On the time-sense. Mind 11(43):393–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-xi.43.393
Tickle-Degnen L, Rosenthal R (1987) Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. In: Hendrick C (ed) Review of personality and social psychology, vol 9. Group processes and intergroup relations. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 113–136
Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973a) Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Atten Percept Psychophys 14(1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198607
Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973b) The timing of interresponse intervals. Atten Percept Psychophys 13(3):455–460. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03205802
Wishart LR, Lee TD, Cunningham SJ, Murdoch JE (2002) Age-related differences and the role of augmented visual feedback in learning a bimanual coordination pattern. Acta Psychol 110(2–3):247–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00036-7
Wulf G, Prinz W (2001) Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev 8(4):648–660. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196201
No funding was received for this research.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Communicated by Bill J Yates.
About this article
Cite this article
Kroger, C., Kagerer, F.A. & McAuley, J.D. Monkey see, monkey tap: mimicry of movement dynamics during coordinated tapping. Exp Brain Res 239, 1465–1477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06061-4
- Interpersonal synchronization
- Finger tapping
- Movement timing
- Motion tracking