Abstract
Little is known about how transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) interacts with brain activity. Here, we investigate the effects of tACS using an intermittent tACS-EEG protocol and use, in addition to classical metrics, Lempel–Ziv–Welch complexity (LZW) to characterize the interactions between task, endogenous and exogenous oscillations. In a cross-over study, EEG was recorded from thirty participants engaged in a change-of-speed detection task while receiving multichannel tACS over the visual cortex at 10 Hz, 70 Hz and a control condition. In each session, tACS was applied intermittently during 5 s events interleaved with EEG recordings over multiple trials. We found that, with respect to control, stimulation at 10 Hz (\(\hbox {tACS}_{10}\)) enhanced both \(\alpha\) and \(\gamma\) power, \(\gamma\)-LZW complexity and \(\gamma\) but not \(\alpha\) phase locking value with respect to tACS onset (\(\alpha\)-PLV, \(\gamma\)-PLV), and increased reaction time (RT). \(\hbox {tACS}_{70}\) increased RT with little impact on other metrics. As trials associated with larger \(\gamma\)-power (and lower \(\gamma\)-LZW) predicted shorter RT, we argue that \(\hbox {tACS}_{10}\) produces a disruption of functionally relevant fast oscillations through an increase in \(\alpha\)-band power, slowing behavioural responses and increasing the complexity of gamma oscillations. Our study highlights the complex interaction between tACS and endogenous brain dynamics, and suggests the use of algorithmic complexity inspired metrics to characterize cortical dynamics in a behaviorally relevant timescale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LZW:
-
Lempel–Ziv–Welch Complexity
- VSO:
-
Visual Stimulus Onset
- CSO:
-
Change of speed onset
- PC:
-
Percentage of correct responses
- RT:
-
reaction time
References
Abásolo D, Simons S, Morgado da Silva R, Tononi G, Vyazovskiy VV (2015) Lempel-Ziv complexity of cortical activity during sleep and waking in rats. J Neurophysiol 113(7):2742
Andrillon T, Poulsen AT, Hansen LK, Léger D, Kouider S (2016) Neural markers of responsiveness to the environment in human sleep. J Neurosci 36(24):6583
Barban F, Buccelli S, Mantini D, Chiappalone M, Semprini M Removal of tACS artefact: a simulation study for algorithm comparison, In: 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) (IEEE, 2019), pp. 393–396
Bland N, Sale M (2019) Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS. Exp Brain Res 237:3071
Braun V, Sokoliuk R, Hanslmayr S (2017) On the effectiveness of event-related beta tACS on episodic memory formation and motor cortex excitability. Brain Stimul 10(5):910
Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F (2011) A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14(8):1133
Buzsáki G, Wang XJ (2012) Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:203
Carhart-Harris R, Friston KJ (2019) REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev 71(3):316
Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali KR, Casarotto S, Bruno MA, Laureys S, Tononi G et al (2013) A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med 5(198):198ra105
Castellano M, Plöchl M, Vicente R, Pipa G (2014) Neuronal oscillations form parietal/frontal networks during contour integration. Front Integr Neurosci 8:64
Cecere R, Rees G, Romei V (2015) Individual differences in alpha frequency drive crossmodal illusory perception. Curr Biol 25(2):231
Dagan M, Herman T, Harrison R, Zhou J, Giladi N, Ruffini G, Manor B, Hausdorff JM (2018) Multitarget transcranial direct current stimulation for freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 33(4):642. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.27300. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29436740
D’Andola M, Rebollo B, Casali AG, Weinert JF, Pigorini A, Villa R, Massimini M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2018) Bistability, causality, and complexity in cortical networks: an in vitro perturbational study. Cereb Cortex 28(7):2233
Feurra M, Pasqualetti P, Bianco G, Santarnecchi E, Rossi A, Rossi S (2013) State-dependent effects of transcranial oscillatory currents on the motor system: what you think matters. J Neurosci 33(44):17483
Fonteneau C, Mondino M, Arns M, Baeken C, Bikson M, Brunoni AR, Burke MJ, Neuvonen T, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Poulet E, Ruffini G, Santarnecchi E, Sauvaget A, Schellhorn K, Suaud-Chagny MF, Palm U, Brunelin J (2019) Sham tDCS: A hidden source of variability? Reflections for further blinded, controlled trials, Brain Stimul 12(3):668
Fries P (2009) Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:209
Fröhlich F, McCormick DA (2010) Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity. Neuron 67:129
Fröhlich F, Sellers KK, Cordle AL (2015) Targeting the neurophysiology of cognitive systems with transcranial alternating current stimulation. Expert Rev Neurother 15(2):145
Gao RD, Peterson EJ, Voytek B (2016) Field potential reflects the balance of synaptic excitation and inhibition, bioRxiv p. 081125
Gruber T, Müller MM, Keil A (2002) Modulation of induced gamma band responses in a perceptual learning task in the human EEG. J Cogn Neurosci 14(5):732
Helfrich RF, Schneider TR, Rach S, Trautmann-Lengsfeld SA, Engel AK, Herrmann CS (2014) Entrainment of brain oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Curr Biol 24(3):333
Herrmann CS, Murray MM, Ionta S, Hutt A, Lefebvre J (2016) Shaping intrinsic neural oscillations with periodic stimulation. J Neurosci 36(19):5328
Hoogenboom N, Schoffelen JM, Oostenveld R, Parkes LM, Fries P (2006) Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space. Neuroimage 29(3):764
Hoogenboom N, Schoffelen JM, Oostenveld R, Fries P (2010) Visually induced gamma-band activity predicts speed of change detection in humans. Neuroimage 51(3):1162
Krause MR, Vieira PG, Csorba BA, Pilly PK, Pack CC (2019) Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain. PNAS
Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8(4):194
Laczó B, Antal A, Niebergall R, Treue S, Paulus W (2012) Transcranial alternating stimulation in a high gamma frequency range applied over V1 improves contrast perception but does not modulate spatial attention. Brain Stimul 5(4):484
Lempel A, Ziv J (1976) On the complexity of finite sequences. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 22(1):75
Li Y, Tong S, Liu D, Gai Y, Wang X, Wang J, Qiu Y, Zhu Y (2008) Abnormal EEG complexity in patients with schizophrenia and depression. Clin Neurophysiol 119(6):1232
Luke Johnson L, Alekseichuk I, Krieg J, Doyle A, Yu Y, Vitek J, Johnson M, Opitz A (2019) Dose-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on spike timing in Awake Nonhuman Primates, bioRxiv
Márquez-Ruiz J, Ammann C, Leal-Campanario R, Ruffini G, Gruart A, Delgado-García JM (2016) Synthetic tactile perception induced by transcranial alternating-current stimulation can substitute for natural sensory stimulus in behaving rabbits. Sci Rep 6:19753
Marshall L, Kirov R, Brade J, Mölle M, Born J (2011) Transcranial electrical currents to probe EEG brain rhythms and memory consolidation during sleep in humans. PLoS One 6(2):e16905
Méndez MA, Zuluaga P, Hornero R, Gómez C, Escudero J, Rodríguez-Palancas A, Ortiz T, Fernández A (2012) Complexity analysis of spontaneous brain activity: effects of depression and antidepressant treatment. J Psychopharmacol 26(5):636
Miranda PC, Callejón-Leblic MA, Salvador Ricardo, Ruffini G (2018) Curr Opin Biomed Eng
Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallett M (2006) Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 117(7):1623
Miranda PC, Mekonnen A, Salvador R, Ruffini G (2013) The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation. Neuroimage 70:48
Molaee-Ardekani B, Márquez-Ruiz J, Merlet I, Leal-Campanario R, Gruart A, Sánchez-Campusano R, Birot G, Ruffini G, Delgado-García JM, Wendling F (2013) Effects of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on cortical activity: a computational modeling study. Brain Stimul 6(1):25
Muthukumaraswamy S (2013) High-frequency brain activity and muscle artifacts in MEG/EEG: a review and recommendations. Front Hum Neurosci 7:138
Neri F, Mencarelli L, Menardi A, Giovannelli F, Rossi S, Sprugnoli G, Rossi A, Pascual-Leone A, Salvador R, Ruffini G, Santarnecchi E (2020) A novel tDCS sham approach based on model-driven controlled shunting. Brain Stimulation 13(2):507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.11.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X1930436X
Neuling T, Rach S, Herrmann CS (2013) Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states. Front Hum Neurosci 7:161
Niethard N, Burgalossi A, Born J (2017) Plasticity during sleep is linked to specific regulation of cortical circuit activity. Front Neural Circuits 11:65
Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM (2011) FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:1
Polanía R, Paulus W (2012) Noninvasively decoding the contents of visual working memory in the human prefrontal cortex within high-gamma oscillatory patterns, Nitsche. J Cognit Neurosci 24(2):304
Ruffini G (2017) An algorithmic information theory of consciousness. Neurosci Consci 3(1)
Ruffini G (2017) Lempel-Zip Complexity Reference, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.09848
Ruffini G, Wendling F, Merlet I, Molaee-Ardekani B, Mekonnen A, Salvador R, Soria-Frisch A, Grau C, Dunne S, Miranda PC (2012) Transcranial current brain stimulation (tCS): models and technologies. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21(3):333
Ruffini G, Fox MD, Ripolles O, Miranda PC, Pascual-Leone A (2014) Optimization of multifocal transcranial current stimulation for weighted cortical pattern targeting from realistic modeling of electric fields. Neuroimage 89:216
Ruffini G, Ibañez D, Kroupi E, Gagnon JF, Montplaisir J, Ronald R, Postuma B, Castellano M, Soria-Frisch A (2019) Algorithmic complexity of EEG for prognosis of neurodegeneration in idiopathic rapid eye movement behavior disorder (RBD). Ann Biomed Eng 47:282
Ruffini G, Salvador R, Tadayon E, Sanchez-Todo R, Pascual-Leone A, Santarnecchi E (2019) Realistic modeling of ephaptic fields in the human brain, bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/688101. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/07/02/688101
Ruhnau P, Neuling T, Fuscá M, Herrmann CS, Demarchi G, Weisz N (2016) Eyes wide shut: transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner. Sci Rep 6:27138
Ruhnau P, Keitel C, Lithari C, Weisz N, Neuling T (2016) Flicker-driven responses in visual cortex change during matched-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 10:184
Sejnowski TJ, Paulsen O (2006) Network oscillations: emerging computational principles. J Neurosci 26(6):1673
Thut G, Schyns P, Gross J (2011) Entrainment of perceptually relevant brain oscillations by non-invasive rhythmic stimulation of the human brain. Front Psychol 2:170
Uhlhaas P, Pipa G, Lima B, Melloni L, Neuenschwander S, Nikolić D, Singer W (2009) Neural synchrony in cortical networks: history, concept and current status. Front Integr Neurosci 3:17
Voss U, Holzmann R, Hobson A, Paulus W, Koppehele-Gossel J, Klimke A, Nitsche MA (2014) Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity. Nat Neurosci 17(6):810
Vossen A, Gross J, Thut G (2015) Alpha power increase after transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency (\(\alpha\)-tACS) reflects plastic changes rather than entrainment. Brain Stimul 8(3):499
Zaehle T, Rach S, Herrmann CS (2010) Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One 5(11):e13766
Zarafshan H, Khaleghi A, Mohammadi M, Moeini M, Malmir N (2016) Electroencephalogram complexity analysis in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during a visual cognitive task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 38(3):361
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: GR is a co-founder, shareholder and employee of Neuroelectrics, the company that provides Starstim and Stimweaver. JA is employee of Neuroelectrics. MC, EK, DI, and ASF, are Starlab employees, the company that gave birth to Neuroelectrics in 2011. GR is a co-founder and shareholder of Starlab. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article
Additional information
Communicated by John C. Rothwell.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castellano, M., Ibañez-Soria, D., Kroupi, E. et al. Intermittent tACS during a visual task impacts neural oscillations and LZW complexity. Exp Brain Res 238, 1411–1422 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05820-z