Abstract
Motor learning has been shown to decline in healthy aging, particularly in the early stages of acquisition. There is now ample evidence that motor learning relies on multiple interacting learning processes that operate on different timescales, but the specific cognitive mechanisms that contribute to motor learning remain unclear. Working memory resources appear to be particularly important during the early stages of motor learning, and declines in early motor learning have been associated with working memory performance in older adults. We examined whether age differences in the early stages of motor learning could be reduced or eliminated by reducing the spatial working memory demands during a force-field adaptation task. Groups of younger and older adults made center-out reaching movements to spatial targets either in a repeating four-element sequence, or in a random order. Participants also performed a battery of cognitive tests to further investigate the potential involvement of associative memory, spatial working memory, and procedural learning mechanisms in the early stage of motor learning. Although all groups adapted their movements equally well by the end of the learning phase, older adults only adapted as quickly as younger adults in the sequence condition, with the older adults in the random group exhibiting slower learning in the earliest stage of motor learning. Across all participants, early motor learning performance was correlated with recognition memory performance on an associative memory test. Within the younger random group, who were able to adapt as quickly as the sequence groups, early motor learning performance was also correlated with performance on a test of procedural learning. These findings suggest that age differences in early stages of motor learning can be eliminated if the spatial working memory demands involved in a motor learning task are limited. Moreover, the results suggest that multiple cognitive resources may be utilized during the early stage of learning, and younger adults may be more flexible than older adults in the recruitment of additional cognitive resources to support learning when spatial working memory demands are high.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.



References
Anguera JA, Seidler RD, Gehring WJ (2009) Changes in performance monitoring during sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 102:1868–1879
Anguera JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Willingham DT, Seidler RD (2010) Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci 22:1917–1930
Anguera J, Reuter-Lorenz P, Willingham D, Seidler R (2011) Failure to engage spatial working memory contributes to age-related declines in visuomotor learning. J Cogn Neurosci 23:11–25
Bock O, Girgenrath M (2006) Relationship between sensorimotor adaptation and cognitive functions in younger and older subjects. Exp Brain Res 169:400–406
Buch ER, Young S, Contreras-Vidal JL (2003) Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging. Learn Mem 10:55–63
Christou AI, Miall RC, McNab F, Galea JM (2016) Individual differences in explicit and implicit visuomotor learning and working memory capacity. Sci Rep 6:36633
Corsi PM (1972) Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Diss Abstr Int 34:819B
Craik FIM (2000) Age-related changes in human memory. In: Park D, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, New York, pp 75–92
Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R (2005) Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25:9919–9931
Eversheim U, Bock O (2001) Evidence for processing stages in skill acquisition: a dual-task study. Learn Mem 8:183–189
Fernández-Ruiz J, Hall C, Vergara P, Dı́az R (2000) Prism adaptation in normal aging: slower adaptation rate and larger aftereffect. Cogn Brain Res 9:223–226
Fernández-Ruiz J, Wong W, Armstrong IT, Flanagan JR (2011) Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation. Behav Brain Res 219:8–14
Hoyer WJ, Verhaeghen P (2006) Memory aging. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 209–232
Huang HJ, Ahmed AA (2014) Older adults learn less, but still reduce metabolic cost, during motor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 111:135–144
Kalaska JF, Cohen D, Prud’Homme M, Hyde ML (1990) Parietal area 5 neuronal activity encodes movement kinematics, not movement dynamics. Exp Brain Res 80:351–364
Keisler A, Shadmehr R (2010) A shared resource between declarative memory and motor memory. J Neurosci 30:14817–14823
Ketcham Seidler R, Van Gemmert A, Stelmach G (2002) Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci 57B:P54–P64
King BR, Fogel SM, Albouy G, Doyon J (2013) Neural correlates of the age-related changes in motor sequence learning and motor adaptation in older adults. Front Hum Neurosci 7:142
Lee J-Y, Schweighofer N (2009) Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory. J Neurosci 29:10396–10404
Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW (2006) An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci 26:3642–3645
McDougle SD, Bond KM, Taylor JA (2015) Explicit and implicit processes constitute the fast and slow processes of sensorimotor learning. J Neurosci 35:9568–9579
McDougle SD, Ivry RB, Taylor JA (2016) Taking aim at the cognitive side of learning in sensorimotor adaptation tasks. Trends Cogn Sci 20:535–544
Mueller ST, Piper BJ (2014) The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. J Neurosci Methods 222:250–259
Seidler RD (2007) Aging affects motor learning but not savings at transfer of learning. Learn Mem 14:17–21
Seidler RD, Bo J, Anguera JA (2012) Neurocognitive contributions to motor skill learning: the role of working memory. J Mot Behav 44:445–453
Smith M, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R (2006) Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 4:e179
Taylor JA, Ivry RB (2011) Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1001096
Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA (2007) Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. J Neurophysiol 98:317–326
Taylor JA, Thoroughman KA (2008) Motor adaptation scaled by the difficulty of a secondary cognitive task. PLoS One 3:e2485
Taylor JA, Klemfuss NM, Ivry RB (2010) An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors. Cerebellum 9:580–586
Taylor JA, Krakauer JW, Ivry RB (2014) Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task. J Neurosci 34:3023–3032
Trewartha KM, Flanagan JR (2016) Distinct contributions of explicit and implicit memory processes to weight prediction when lifting objects and judging their weights: an aging study. J Neurophysiol 116:1128–1136
Trewartha KM, Garcia A, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2014) Fast but fleeting: adaptive motor learning processes associated with aging and cognitive decline. J Neurosci 34:13411–13421
Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2016) Computations underlying sensorimotor learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 37:7–11
Acknowledgements
We thank the Portage Health Foundation for supporting students involved in this work. We also thank Madelyn Morley, Mariah Sherman, and Tessa Sprague for assistance with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rajeshkumar, L., Trewartha, K.M. Advanced spatial knowledge of target location eliminates age-related differences in early sensorimotor learning. Exp Brain Res 237, 1781–1791 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05551-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05551-w
Keywords
- Sensorimotor adaptation
- Spatial working memory
- Associative memory
- Aging
- Implicit memory