Advertisement

Remote muscle contraction enhances spinal reflexes in multiple lower-limb muscles elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

  • Yohei Masugi
  • Atsushi Sasaki
  • Naotsugu Kaneko
  • Kimitaka NakazawaEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a useful technique for the clinical assessment of neurological disorders. However, the characteristics of the spinal cord circuits activated by tSCS are not yet fully understood. In this study, we examined whether remote muscle contraction enhances the spinal reflexes evoked by tSCS in multiple lower-limb muscles. Eight healthy men participated in the current experiment, which required them to grip a dynamometer as fast as possible after the presentation of an auditory cue. Spinal reflexes were evoked in multiple lower-limb muscles with different time intervals (50–400 ms) after the auditory signals. The amplitudes of the spinal reflexes in all the recorded leg muscles significantly increased at 50–250 ms after remote muscle activation onset. This suggests that remote muscle contraction simultaneously facilitates the spinal reflexes in multiple lower-limb muscles. In addition, eight healthy men performed five different tasks (i.e., rest, hand grip, pinch grip, elbow flexion, and shoulder flexion). Compared to control values recorded just before each task, the spinal reflexes evoked at 250 ms after the auditory signals were significantly enhanced by the above tasks except for the rest task. This indicates that such facilitatory effects are also induced by remote muscle contractions in different upper-limb areas. The present results demonstrate the existence of a neural interaction between remote upper-limb muscles and spinal reflex circuits activated by tSCS in multiple lower-limb muscles. The combination of tSCS and remote muscle contraction may be useful for the neurological examination of spinal cord circuits.

Keywords

Jendrássik maneuver Remote muscle Spinal reflex Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation 

Abbreviations

APB

Abductor pollicis brevis

AD

Anterior deltoid

BB

Biceps brachii

BF

Biceps femoris

EMG

Electromyographic

Exp

Experiment

ECR

Extensor carpi radialis

FDI

First dorsal interosseous

FCR

Flexor carpi radialis

H-reflex

Hoffmann reflex

JM

Jendrássik maneuver

MVC

Maximum voluntary contraction

MVF

Maximum voluntary force

MG

Medial gastrocnemius

RMS

Root mean square

SOL

Soleus

T-reflex

Tendon-reflex

TA

Tibialis anterior

tSCS

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

VM

Vastus medialis

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 18K17760.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interests exist.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

221_2019_5536_MOESM1_ESM.tif (7.4 mb)
Supplementary Fig.1: Results of the double-pulse stimulation test: A) Typical example of the averaged waveform of the responses elicited by double-pulse stimulation (n=1) in multiple lower-limb muscles. tSCS was delivered at 0 ms and 50 ms. B) Medians (n=8) of the peak to-peak amplitude of both the first and the second response. The lines in the box plots indicate the medians. The ends of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers on the boxplot illustrate the 10th and 90th percentiles. Legend: * = p<0.05 (TIFF 7569 kb)
221_2019_5536_MOESM2_ESM.tif (6.9 mb)
Supplementary Fig.2: Results of the double-pulse stimulation test: A) Typical example of the averaged waveform of the responses elicited by double-pulse stimulation (n=1) in multiple lower-limb muscles. tSCS was delivered at 0 ms and 50 ms. B) Medians (n=8) of the peak to-peak amplitude of both the first and the second response. The lines in the box plots indicate the medians. The ends of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers on the boxplot illustrate the 10th and 90th percentiles. Legend: * = p<0.05 (TIFF 7047 kb)
221_2019_5536_MOESM3_ESM.tif (3.8 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 3: Background EMG activity as observed in experiment 1. Filled circles represent the mean (n=8). Unfilled circles represent the individual data points from each participant (TIFF 3890 kb)
221_2019_5536_MOESM4_ESM.tif (2.1 mb)
Supplementary Fig.4: Background EMG activity as observed in experiment 2. The lines in the box plots indicate median values. The ends of the boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles. The whiskers on the boxplot illustrate the 10th and 90th percentiles. Legend: * = p<0.05 (TIFF 2118 kb)

References

  1. Andriyanova EY (2010) Characteristics of multisegmental monosynaptic responses of leg muscles in subjects with lumber nerve compression. Hum Physiol 36:440–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boroojerdi B, Battaglia F, Muellbacher W, Cohen LG (2000) Voluntary teeth clenching facilitates human motor system excitability. Clin Neurophysiol 111:988–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke JR, Schutten MC, Koceja DM, Kamen G (1996) Age-dependent effects of muscle vibration and the Jendrassik maneuver on the patellar tendon reflex response. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:600–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bussel B, Morin C, Pierrot-Deseilligny E (1978) Mechanism of monosynaptic reflex reinforcement during Jendrassik manoeuvre in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 41:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Courtine G, Harkema SJ, Dy CJ, Gerasimenko YP, Dyhre-Poulsen P (2007) Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans. J Physiol 582:1125–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danner SM, Hofstoetter US, Ladenbauer J, Rattay F, Minassian K (2011) Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study. Artif Organs 35:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danner SM, Krenn M, Hofstoetter US, Toth A, Mayr W, Minassian K (2016) Body position influences which neural structures are recruited by lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. PLoS One 11:e0147479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delwaide PJ, Toulouse P (1980) Jendrassik maneuver vs controlled contractions conditioning the excitability of soleus monosynaptic reflexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61:505–510Google Scholar
  9. Delwaide PJ, Toulouse P (1981) Facilitation of monosynaptic reflexes by voluntary contraction of muscle in remote parts of the body. Mechanisms involved in the Jendrassik Manoeuvre. Brain 104:701–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietz V, Muller R, Colombo G (2002) Locomotor activity in spinal man: significance of afferent input from joint and load receptors. Brain 125:2626–2634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dowman R, Wolpaw JR (1988) Jendrassik maneuver facilitates soleus H-reflex without change in average soleus motoneuron pool membrane potential. Exp Neurol 101:288–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dy CJ, Gerasimenko YP, Edgerton VR, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Courtine G, Harkema SJ (2010) Phase-dependent modulation of percutaneously elicited multisegmental muscle responses after spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol 103:2808–2820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furubayashi T, Sugawara K, Kasai T, Hayashi A, Hanajima R, Shiio Y, Iwata NK, Ugawa Y (2003) Remote effects of self-paced teeth clenching on the excitability of hand motor area. Exp Brain Res 148:261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerasimenko YP, Lu DC, Modaber M, Zdunowski S, Gad P, Sayenko DG, Morikawa E, Haakana P, Ferguson AR, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (2015) Noninvasive reactivation of motor descending control after paralysis. J Neurotrauma 32:1968–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagbarth KE, Wallin G, Burke D, Löfstedt L (1975) Effects of the Jendrassik manoeuvre on muscle spindle activity in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:1143–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hubli M, Dietz V (2013) The physiological basis of neurorehabilitation-locomotor training after spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10:5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawamura T, Watanabe S (1975) Timing as a prominent factor of the Jendrassik manoeuvre on the H reflex. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitano K, Koceja DM (2009) Spinal reflex in human lower leg muscles evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 180:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kojima N, Nakazawa K, Yamamoto S-I, Yano H (1998) Phase-dependent electromyographic activity of the lower-limb muscles of a patient with clinically complete spinal cord injury during orthotic gait. Exp Brain Res 120:139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kojima N, Nakazawa K, Yano H (1999) Effects of limb loading on the lower-limb electromyographic activity during orthotic locomotion in a paraplegic patient. Neurosci Lett 274:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krenn M, Hofstoetter US, Danner SM, Minassian K, Mayr W (2015) Multi-electrode array for transcutaneous lumbar posterior root stimulation. Artif Organs 39:834–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landau WM, Clare MH (1964) Fusimotor function. VI. H reflex, tendon jerk, and reinforcement in hemiplegia. Arch Neurol 10:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Masugi Y, Obata H, Nakazawa K (2017) Effects of anode position on the responses elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2017:1114–1117Google Scholar
  24. Minassian K, Persy I, Rattay F, Dimitrijevic MR, Hofer C, Kern H (2007) Posterior root-muscle reflexes elicited by transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbosacral cord. Muscle Nerve 35:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miyahara T, Hagiya N, Ohyama T, Nakamura Y (1996) Modulation of human soleus H reflex in association with voluntary clenching of the teeth. J Neurophysiol 76:2033–2041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roy FD, Gibson G, Stein RB (2012) Effect of percutaneous stimulation at different spinal levels on the activation of sensory and motor roots. Exp Brain Res 223:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roy FD, Bosgra D, Stein RB (2014) Interaction of transcutaneous spinal stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in human leg muscles. Exp Brain Res 232:1717–1728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sayenko DG, Atkinson DA, Dy CJ, Gurley KM, Smith VL, Angeli C, Harkema SJ, Edgerton VR, Gerasimenko YP (2015) Spinal segment-specific transcutaneous stimulation differentially shapes activation pattern among motor pools in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 118:1364–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sugawara K, Kasai T (2002) Facilitation of motor evoked potentials and H-reflexes of flexor carpi radialis muscle induced by voluntary teeth clenching. Hum Mov Sci 21:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Takada Y, Miyahara T, Tanaka T, Ohyama T, Nakamura Y (2000) Modulation of H reflex of pretibial muscles and reciprocal Ia inhibition of soleus muscle during voluntary teeth clenching in humans. J Neurophysiol 83:2063–2070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Takeoka A, Vollenweider I, Courtine G, Arber S (2014) Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell 159:1626–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tazoe T, Komiyama T (2014) Interlimb neural interactions in the corticospinal pathways. J Sports Med Phys Fit 3:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tazoe T, Kida T, Wasaka T, Sakamoto M, Nakajima T, Nishihira Y, Komiyama T (2005) Attenuation of the effect of remote muscle contraction on the soleus H-reflex during plantar flexion. Clin Neurophysiol 116:1362–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Troni W, Di Sapio A, Berra E, Duca S, Merola A, Sperli F, Bertolotto A (2011) A methodological reappraisal of non invasive high voltage electrical stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots. Clin Neurophysiol 122:2071–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zehr EP (2002) Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies. Eur J Appl Physiol 86:455–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zehr EP, Stein RB (1999) Interaction of the Jendrassik maneuver with segmental presynaptic inhibition. Exp Brain Res 124:474–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yohei Masugi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Atsushi Sasaki
    • 1
  • Naotsugu Kaneko
    • 1
  • Kimitaka Nakazawa
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Sports Medicine and ScienceTokyo International UniversitySaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations