Short-latency afferent-induced facilitation and inhibition as predictors of thermally induced variations in corticomotor excitability
- 77 Downloads
Recently (Ansari et al., PeerJ 6:e6163, 2018a; Somatosens Mot Res 35:69–79, 2018b), we showed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that focal application of innocuous thermal stimuli to the distal hand produced variable responses in terms of motor-evoked potential (MEP) suppression or enhancement. Here, we sought to investigate possible causes of this variability by examining circuits mediating sensorimotor integration and intra-cortical inhibition. Participants (n = 21) first underwent TMS to assess baseline corticomotor excitability by measuring MEPs at rest with the index finger wrapped in a gel pack at room temperature (24 °C). Then, conditioned protocols were applied to assess short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), short-latency afferent facilitation (SAF) and short-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI). Following baseline measures, MEP modulation in response to distal cooling was recorded with the index finger wrapped in a gel pack at ~ 10 °C. At baseline, participants exhibited variable levels of SAI, SAF and SICI. Participant also exhibited variable responses to cooling with about half of them (11/21) showing suppressed excitability and one-third showing enhanced excitability (7/21). A linear regression analysis revealed that SAI and SAF proved to be good predictors of cooling-induced variations in corticomotor excitability but not SICI. These results provide novel evidence linking variations in SAI and SAF with those in corticomotor excitability elicited in response to focal thermal stimulation, suggesting that these markers could be used to predict responses to sensory stimulation protocols.
KeywordsThermal stimulation Motor evoked potentials Short-latency afferent inhibition Sensorimotor integration Peripheral stimulation Transcranial magnetic stimulation
The authors wish to thank all participants for their time and patience during testing. Part of this work was performed in the context of a Ph.D. in Rehabilitation Sciences by Y. Ansari. Y. Ansari received financial support from the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, in the form of a graduate scholarship. This research was also supported by the Graduate Studentship Program at the Bruyère Research Institute.
- Chen JC, Liang CC, Shaw FZ (2005) Facilitation of sensory and motor recovery by thermal intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in acute stroke patients: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 36:2665–2669. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000189992.06654.ab CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Geurts CL, Sleivert GG, Cheung SS (2005) Effect of cold-induced vasodilatation in the index finger on temperature and contractile characteristics of the first dorsal interosseus muscle during cold-water immersion. Eur J Appl Physiol 93:524–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1254-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hinder MR, Goss EL, Fujiyama H, Canty AJ, Garry MI, Rodger J, Summers JJ (2014) Inter- and Intra-individual variability following intermittent theta burst stimulation: implications for rehabilitation and recovery. Brain Stimul 7:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miyaguchi S, Kojima S, Sasaki R, Tamaki H, Onishi H (2017) Modulation of short-latency afferent inhibition and short-interval intracortical inhibition by test stimulus intensity and motor-evoked potential amplitude. Neuroreport 28:1202–1207. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Young-Bernier M, Davidson PS, Tremblay F (2012) Paired-pulse afferent modulation of TMS responses reveals a selective decrease in short latency afferent inhibition with age. Neurobiol Aging 33:835 e831–e811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar