Skip to main content
Log in

Training children aged 5–10 years in compliance control: tracing smaller figures yields better learning not specific to the scale of drawn figures

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previously we developed a method that supports active movement generation to allow practice with improvement of good compliance control in tracing and drawing. We showed that the method allowed children with motor impairments to improve at a 3D tracing task to become as proficient as typically developing children and that the training improved 2D figure copying. In this study, we expanded the training protocol to include a wider variety of ages (5–10-year-olds) and we made the figures traced in training the same as in figure copying, but varied the scale of training and copying figures to assess the generality of learning. Forty-eight children were assigned to groups trained using large or small figures. All were tested before training with a tracing task and a copying task. Then, the children trained over five sessions in the tracing task with either small or large figures. Finally, the tracing and copying tasks were tested again following training. A mean speed measure was used to control for path length variations in the timed task. Performance on both tasks at both baseline and posttest varied as a function of the size of the figure and age. In addition, tracing performance also varied with the level of support. In particular, speeds were higher with more support, larger figures and older children. After training, performance improved. Speeds increased. In tracing, performance improved more for large figures traced by children who trained on large figures. In copying, however, performance only improved significantly for children who had trained on small figures and it improved equally for large and small figures. In conclusion, training by tracing smaller figures yielded better learning that was not, however, specific to the scale of drawn figures. Small figures exhibit greater mean curvature. We infer that it yielded better general improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In previous studies, children would take a long time when completing trials with low attractive force, which would cause frustration. To mitigate this, each trial was terminated if a child could not complete more than one-half of the path within 60 s.

  2. If a child did not beat the competitor fish twice in a row within 6 trials, s/he would automatically advance to the next stage of training.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NICHD R01HD070832.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey P. Bingham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snapp-Childs, W., Fath, A.J. & Bingham, G.P. Training children aged 5–10 years in compliance control: tracing smaller figures yields better learning not specific to the scale of drawn figures. Exp Brain Res 236, 2589–2601 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5319-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5319-y

Keywords

Navigation