Underestimation of large distances in active and passive locomotion
- 110 Downloads
Our ability to estimate distances, be it verbally or by locomotion, is exquisite at close range (action space). At distances above 100 m (vista space), verbal estimates continue to be quite accurate, whereas locomotor estimates have been found to be grossly underestimated. Until now, however, the latter have been performed on a treadmill, which might not translate to real-world walking. We investigated if the motor underestimation found on the treadmill holds up in a natural environment. Observers viewed pictures of objects at distances between 10 and 245 m and were asked to reproduce these distances in a blindfolded walking task (using passive movement or an active production method). Active and passive locomotor judgments underestimated far distances above 100 m. We conclude that underestimation of large distances does not depend on the medium (treadmill vs. real-world) but rather on the sensory modality and effort involved in the task.
KeywordsDistance perception Vista space Locomotor judgment Underestimation Natural environment
We thank Agnes Münch for her support. CvC was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (German Research Foundation), grant “Innenraumwahrnehmung” [Grant numbers HE 2122/10-2 (Heiko Hecht) and OB 346/5-2 (Daniel Oberfeld)].
- Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- Loomis JM, Knapp JM (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. Virtual Adapt Environ 11:21–46Google Scholar
- Trinkler I, Jarchow T (2000) Non visual reproduction of long distances. In: Bülthoff H, Fahle M, Gegenfurtner KR, Mallot HA (eds) Beiträge zur 3. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz. Knirsch-Verlag, Kirchentellinsfurt, p 140Google Scholar