Abstract
The space immediately surrounding our bodies, i.e., peripersonal space (PPS), is a critical area for the interaction with the external world, be it to deal with imminent threat or to attain objects of interest. In the brain, a dedicated system codes PPS in motor terms for the purpose of action. Yet, humans have asymmetric motor abilities: the dominant hand has an advantage in term of movements’ precision and reaction time. Furthermore, spatial attention is asymmetric and seems to be linked to a right hemispheric dominance for spatial processing. Here, we tested whether handedness and attentional asymmetries impact the detection of a tactile stimulus when an irrelevant auditory stimulus is looming towards the individual from the right or left hemispace. We examined the distance at which sound started speeding up tactile detection to estimate the morphometry of peri-trunk PPS. Our results show that right-handers’ PPS is larger in the left than in the right hemispace, whereas left-handers’ PPS is symmetric. The expansion of right-handers’ PPS on the side of the non-dominant hand is coherent with a protective function of PPS. Left-handers’ symmetric PPS can be related to the symmetric request of their motor abilities induced by living in a right-handers’ world. These findings reveal that PPS is not uniform and suggest that general mechanisms of spatial processing as well as motor skills could play a role in the representation of peri-trunk PPS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alais D, Newell FN, Mamassian P (2010) Multisensory processing in review: from physiology to behaviour. Seeing Perceiving 23:3–38. https://doi.org/10.1163/187847510X488603
Annett M (1970) The growth of manual preference and speed. Br J Psychol 61:545–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1970.tb01274.x
Aspell JE, Lavanchy T, Lenggenhager B, Blanke O (2010) Seeing the body modulates audiotactile integration. Eur J Neurosci 31:1868–1873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07210.x
Bassolino M, Serino A, Ubaldi S, Làdavas E (2010) Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation. Neuropsychologia 48:803–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.009
Bassolino M, Finisguerra A, Canzoneri E et al (2014) Dissociating effect of upper limb non-use and overuse on space and body representations. Neuropsychologia 70:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.028
Bertelson P, Aschersleben G (1998) Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychon Bull Rev 5:482–489
Bremmer F, Schlack A, Shah NJ et al (2001) Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 29:287–296
Bresciani J-P, Dammeier F, Ernst MO (2006) Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. J Vis 6:554–564. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.5.2
Brozzoli C, Gentile G, Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2011) fMRI Adaptation Reveals a Cortical Mechanism for the Coding of Space Near the Hand. J Neurosci 31:9023–9031. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1172-11.2011
Burke KA, Letsos A, Butler RA (1994) Asymmetric performances in binaural localization of sound in space. Neuropsychologia 32:1409–1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)00074-3
Camponogara I, Komeilipoor N, Cesari P (2015) When distance matters: Perceptual bias and behavioral response for approaching sounds in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuroscience 304:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.054
Canzoneri E, Magosso E, Serino A (2012) Dynamic sounds capture the boundaries of peripersonal space representation in humans. PLoS ONE 7:e44306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044306
Canzoneri E, Marzolla M, Amoresano A et al (2013a) Amputation and prosthesis implantation shape body and peripersonal space representations. Sci Rep 3:2844. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02844
Canzoneri E, Ubaldi S, Rastelli V et al (2013b) Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Exp Brain Res 228:25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3532-2
Carnahan H (1998) Manual asymmetries in response to rapid target movement. Brain Cognit 37:237–253. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0973
Cowey A, Small M, Ellis S (1994) Left visuo-spatial neglect can be worse in far than in near space. Neuropsychologia 32:1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(94)90152-X
de Haan AM, Smit M, Van der Stigchel S, Dijkerman HC (2016) Approaching threat modulates visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space. Exp Brain Res 234:1875–1884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4571-2
Dietz MJ, Friston KJ, Mattingley JB et al (2014) Effective connectivity reveals right-hemisphere dominance in audiospatial perception: implications for models of spatial neglect. J Neurosci 34:5003–5011. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3765-13.2014
Dijkerman HC, Farnè A (2015) Sensorimotor and social aspects of peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 70:309–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.005
Dufour A, Touzalin P, Candas V (2007) Rightward shift of the auditory subjective straight ahead in right- and left-handed subjects. Neuropsychologia 45:447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.027
Farnè A, Iriki A, Làdavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: Evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.010
Farnè A, Serino A, Làdavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space following tool-use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 43:436–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70468-4
Finisguerra A, Canzoneri E, Serino A et al (2015) Moving sounds within the peripersonal space modulate the motor system. Neuropsychologia 70:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.043
Flowers K (1975) Handedness and controlled movement. Br J Psychol 66:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01438.x
Gentile G, Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH (2011) Integration of visual and tactile signals from the hand in the human brain: an FMRI study. J Neurophysiol 105:910–922. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00840.2010
Gérin-Lajoie M, Richards CL, Fung J, McFadyen BJ (2008) Characteristics of personal space during obstacle circumvention in physical and virtual environments. Gait Posture 27:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.015
Gonzalez CLR, Whitwell RL, Morrissey B et al (2007) Left handedness does not extend to visually guided precision grasping. Exp Brain Res 182:275–279
Graziano MSA, Cooke DF (2006) Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 44:2621–2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.011
Graziano MSA, Gross CG (1993) A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res 97:96–109
Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension
Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1991) Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350:498–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/350498a0
Hayduk L (1981) The shape of personal space: an experimental investigation. Can J Behav Sci 13:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081114
Heilman KM, Van Den Abell T (1979) Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation. Neuropsychologia 17:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(79)90077-0
Iachini T, Ruggiero G, Ruotolo F, Vinciguerra M (2014) Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: evidence from motor interference. Acta Psychol (Amst) 153:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.001
Kandula M, Van der Stoep N, Hofman D, Dijkerman HC (2017) On the contribution of overt tactile expectations to visuo-tactile interactions within the peripersonal space. Exp Brain Res 235:2511–2522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4965-9
Kerr M, Rosemary M, Elithorn A (1963) Cerebral dominance in reaction time responses. Br J Psychol 54:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00887.x
Krumbholz K, Schönwiesner M, Von Cramon DY et al (2005) Representation of interaural temporal information from left and right auditory space in the human planum temporale and inferior parietal lobe. Cereb Cortex 15:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh133
Krumbholz K, Hewson-Stoate N, Schönwiesner M (2007) Cortical response to auditory motion suggests an asymmetry in the reliance on inter-hemispheric connections between the left and right auditory cortices. J Neurophysiol 97:1649–1655. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00560.2006
Làdavas E, Farnè A (2004) Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space. J Physiol Paris 98:161–170
Le Bigot N, Grosjean M (2012) Effects of handedness on visual sensitivity in perihand space. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043150
Linkenauger S, Witt JK, Stefanucci JK et al (2009) The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:1649–1660. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016875
Lloyd DM, Coates A, Knopp J et al (2009) Don’t stand so close to me: The effect of auditory input on interpersonal space. Perception 38:617–620. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6317
Longo MR, Lourenco SF (2006) On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 44:977–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.003
Longo MR, Lourenco SF (2007) Space perception and body morphology: extent of near space scales with arm length. Exp Brain Res 177:285–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-0855-x
Lourenco SF, Longo MR (2009) The plasticity of near space: evidence for contraction. Cognition 112:451–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.011
Luce RD (1986) Response times: their role in inferring elementary mental organization (no. 8), Oxford University Press, Oxford
Maister L, Cardini F, Zamariola G et al (2015) Your place or mine: Shared sensory experiences elicit a remapping of peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 70:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.027
Makin TR, Holmes NP, Zohary E (2007) Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. J Neurosci 27:731–740. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007
Mamolo CM, Roy E, Rohr LE, Bryden PJ (2006) Reaching patterns across working space: the effects of handedness, task demands, and comfort levels. Laterality 11:465–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600775692
Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cognit Sci 8:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008
Marchant LF, McGrew WC, Eibl-Eibesfeldt I (1995) Is human handedness universal? Ethological analyses from three traditional cultures. Ethology 101:239–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb00362.x
McGlone J, Davidson W (1973) The relation between cerebral speech laterality and spatial ability with special reference to sex and hand preference. Neuropsychologia 11:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(73)90070-5
Michaels CF (1988) S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.14.2.231
Nicholls MER, Thomas NA, Loetscher T, Grimshaw GM (2013) The flinders handedness survey (FLANDERS): a brief measure of skilled hand preference. Cortex 49:2914–2926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.002
Noel J-P, Grivaz P, Marmaroli P et al (2015) Full body action remapping of peripersonal space: the case of walking. Neuropsychologia 70:375–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.030
Ocklenburg S, Hirnstein M, Hausmann M, Lewald J (2010) Auditory space perception in left- and right-handers. Brain Cognit 72:210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.08.013
Quesque F, Ruggiero G, Mouta S et al (2016) Keeping you at arm’s length: modifying peripersonal space influences interpersonal distance. Psychol Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0782-1
Railo H, Tallus J, Hämäläinen H (2011) Right visual field advantage for perceived contrast: correlation with an auditory bias and handedness. Brain Cognit 77:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.019
Raymond M, Pontier D, Dufour A-B, Pape Moller A (1996) Frequency-dependent maintenance of left handedness in humans. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1627–1633
Reuter-Lorenz P, Kinsbourne M, Moscovitch M (1990) Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain Cognit 266:240–266
Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V (1997) The space around us. Science 277:190–191
Sambo CF, Iannetti GD (2013) Better safe than sorry? The safety margin surrounding the body is increased by anxiety. J Neurosci 33:14225–14230. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0706-13.2013
Savel S (2009) Individual differences and left/right asymmetries in auditory space perception. I. Localization of low-frequency sounds in free field. Hear Res 255:142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.013
Serino A (2016) Variability in multisensory responses predicts the self-space. Trends Cognit Sci 20:169–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.005
Serino A, Bassolino M, Farnè A, Làdavas E (2007) Extended multisensory space in blind cane users. Psychol Sci 18:642–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01952.x
Serino A, Canzoneri E, Avenanti A (2011) Fronto-parietal areas necessary for a multisensory representation of peripersonal space in humans: an rTMS study. J Cognit Neurosci 23:2956–2967. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00006
Serino A, Noel J-P, Galli G et al (2015) Body part-centered and full body-centered peripersonal space representation. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18603
Spence C, Pavani F, Driver J (2004a) Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci 4:148–169. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.2.148
Spence C, Pavani F, Maravita A, Holmes NP (2004b) Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J Physiol Paris 98:171–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008
Taffou M, Viaud-Delmon I (2014) Cynophobic fear adaptively extends peri-personal space. Front Psychiatry 5:3–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00122
Ulrich R, Miller J (1993) Information processing models generating lognormally distributed reaction times. J Math Psychol 37(4):513
Vagnoni E, Andreanidou V, Lourenco SF, Longo MR (2017) Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments. Exp Brain Res 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5008-2
Viaud-Delmon I, Brugger P, Landis T (2007) Hemineglect: Take a look at the back space. Ann Neurol 62:418–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21176
Vogel JJ, Bowers CA, Vogel DS (2003) Cerebral lateralization of spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Brain Cognit 52:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00056-3
Zahorik P, Brungart DS, Bronkhorst AW (2005) Auditory distance perception in humans: a summary of past and present research. 91:pp 409–420
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the funding of Sorbonne Universités Investissements d’avenir, Emergence; and by the program Bettencourt of the FdV doctoral school (Ecole Doctorale Frontières du Vivant (FdV)—Programme Bettencourt). We are grateful to Emmanuel Fléty and Arnaud Recher for their help with the apparatus for tactile stimulation. We thank Olivier Warusfel for his help on the elaboration of spatialized auditory stimuli through binaural rendering. We thank Philippe Nivaggioli for his help during setup installation. We thank Cassandra Visconti for proofreading this manuscript for American English spelling.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hobeika, L., Viaud-Delmon, I. & Taffou, M. Anisotropy of lateral peripersonal space is linked to handedness. Exp Brain Res 236, 609–618 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5158-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5158-2