Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 236, Issue 2, pp 599–608 | Cite as

The effect of proprioceptive acuity variability on motor adaptation in older adults

Research Article

Abstract

Motor adaptation requires efficient integration of sensory information with predicted sensory consequences of one’s own action. However, the effect of reduced sensory acuity on motor adaptation in humans remains to be further investigated. Here, we examined the variability of proprioceptive acuity during an arm-position matching task and the pattern of visuomotor adaptation in older and young adults, and determined the relationship between the two variables. The older adults, a known example of impaired proprioceptive acuity, exhibited greater trial-to-trial variability during the arm-position matching task as compared with the young adults. Furthermore, the older adults showed a slower rate of adaptation to a 30° visuomotor rotation during targeted reaching movements, as well as larger movement errors in the later phase of adaptation, than the young adults. Our correlation analyses indicated a negative association between the variability in proprioceptive acuity and the rate of visuomotor adaptation in the older adults; and no association was observed in the young adults. These findings point to a possibility that an increase in the variability of proprioceptive acuity due to aging may weaken the integration of predicted and actual sensory feedback, which in turn may result in poor visuomotor adaptation in older adults.

Keywords

Aging Motor learning Visuomotor rotation Proprioception Trial-to-trial variability 

References

  1. Allison T, Hume AL, Wood CC, Goff WR (1984) Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 58:14–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aydog ST, Korkusuz P, Doral MN, Tetik O, Demirel HA (2006) Decrease in the numbers of mechanoreceptors in rabbit ACL: the effects of ageing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:325–329CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastian AJ (2008) Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 21:628CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS (2008) The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J Vis 8:20–20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke JR, Schutten MC, Koceja DM, Kamen G (1996) Age-dependent effects of muscle vibration and the Jendrassik maneuver on the patellar tendon reflex response. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:600–604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clamann HP (1969) Statistical analysis of motor unit firing patterns in a human skeletal muscle. Biophys J 9:1233–1251CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Coq J, Xerri C (2000) Age-related alteration of the forepaw representation in the rat primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience 99:403–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coq J, Xerri C (2001) Sensorimotor experience modulates age-dependent alterations of the forepaw representation in the rat primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroscience 104:705–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cressman EK, Salomonczyk D, Henriques DY (2010) Visuomotor adaptation and proprioceptive recalibration in older adults. Exp Brain Res 205:533–544CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling WG, Cooke JD, Brown SH (1989) Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 10:149–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Diedrichsen J, Verstynen T, Lehman SL, Ivry RB (2005) Cerebellar involvement in anticipating the consequences of self-produced actions during bimanual movements. J Neurophysiol 93:801–812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R (2003) Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 23:9032–9045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Faulkner JA, Larkin LM, Claflin DR, Brooks SV (2007) Age-related changes in the structure and function of skeletal muscles. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34:1091–1096CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez-Ruiz J, Hall C, Vergara P, Diaz R (2000) Prism adaptation in normal aging: slower adaptation rate and larger aftereffect. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 9:223–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez-Ruiz J, Wong W, Armstrong IT, Flanagan JR (2011) Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation. Behav Brain Res 219:8–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrell WR, Crighton A, Sturrock RD (1992a) Position sense at the proximal interphalangeal joint is distorted in patients with rheumatoid arthritis of finger joints. Exp Physiol 77:675–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrell WR, Crighton A, Sturrock RD (1992b) Age-dependent changes in position sense in human proximal interphalangeal joints. Neuroreport 3:259–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Galea JM, Vazquez A, Pasricha N, de Xivry JJ, Celnik P (2011) Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns. Cereb Cortex 21:1761–1770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibo TL, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Okamura AM, Bastian AJ (2013) Cerebellar motor learning: are environment dynamics more important than error size? J Neurophysiol 110:322–333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, Geurts M, Van Hecke W, Sunaert S, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2012) The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen. Hum Brain Mapp 33:895–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Wenderoth N, Van Impe A, Swinnen SP (2009) Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:271–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Godde B, Berkefeld T, David-Jürgens M, Dinse H (2002) Age-related changes in primary somatosensory cortex of rats: evidence for parallel degenerative and plastic-adaptive processes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:743–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Good C, Johnsrude I, Ashburner J, Henson R, Friston K, Frackowiak R (2001) A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. Neuroimage 14:21–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Haith AM, Krakauer JW (2013) Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning. Adv Exp Med Biol 782:1–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamzey RJ, Kirk EM, Vasudevan EV (2016) Gait speed influences aftereffect size following locomotor adaptation, but only in certain environments. Exp Brain Res 234:1479–1490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrington DL, Haaland KY (1992) Skill learning in the elderly: diminished implicit and explicit memory for a motor sequence. Psychol Aging 7:425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Heuer H, Hegele M (2014) Age-related variations of visuo-motor adaptation beyond explicit knowledge. Front Aging Neurosci 6:152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Heuninckx S, Wenderoth N, Debaere F, Peeters R, Swinnen SP (2005) Neural basis of aging: the penetration of cognition into action control. J Neurosci 25:6787–6796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Heuninckx S, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2008a) Age-related reduction in the differential pathways involved in internal and external movement generation. Neurobiol Aging 31:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heuninckx S, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2008b) Systems neuroplasticity in the aging brain: recruiting additional neural resources for successful motor performance in elderly persons. J Neurosci 28:91–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard JH, Howard DV (1997) Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. Psychol Aging 12:634–656CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang VS, Haith A, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW (2011) Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models. Neuron 70:787–801CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Hurley MV, Rees J, Newham DJ (1998) Quadriceps function, proprioceptive acuity and functional performance in healthy young, middle-aged and elderly subjects. Age Ageing 27:55–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Izawa J, Shadmehr R (2008) On-line processing of uncertain information in visuomotor control. J Neurosci 28:11360–11368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Izawa J, Criscimagna-Hemminger SE, Shadmehr R (2012) Cerebellar contributions to reach adaptation and learning sensory consequences of action. J Neurosci 32:4230–4239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaasinen V, Rinne JO (2002) Functional imaging studies of dopamine system and cognition in normal aging and Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:785–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalisch T, Kattenstroth JC, Kowalewski R, Tegenthoff M, Dinse HR (2012) Age-related changes in the joint position sense of the human hand. Clin Interv Aging 7:499–507CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kararizou E, Manta P, Kalfakis N, Vassilopoulos D (2005) Morphometric study of the human muscle spindle. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 27:1–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim GH, Suzuki S, Kanda K (2007) Age-related physiological and morphological changes of muscle spindles in rats. J Physiol 582:525–538CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Körding KP, Wolpert DM (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427:244–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Körding KP, Wolpert DM (2006) Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci 10:319–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Körding KP, Tenenbaum JB, Shadmehr R (2007) The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nat neurosci 10:779–786CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Korenberg AT, Ghahramani Z (2002) A Bayesian view of motor adaptation. Curr Psychol Cogn 21:537–564Google Scholar
  44. Lei Y, Bao S, Wang J (2016) The combined effects of action observation and passive proprioceptive training on adaptive motor learning. Neuroscience 331:91–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu J, Eriksson P, Thornell L, Pedrosa-Domellöf F (2005) Fiber content and myosin heavy chain composition of muscle spindles in aged human biceps brachii. J Histochem Cytochem 53:445–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT (1996) Throwing while looking through prisms. Brain 119:1183–1198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Maschke M, Gomez CM, Ebner TJ, Konczak J (2004) Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements. J Neurophysiol 91:230–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mawase F, Bar-Haim S, Joubran K, Rubin L, Karniel A, Shmuelof L (2016) Increased adaptation rates and reduction in trial-by-trial variability in subjects with cerebral palsy following a multi-session locomotor adaptation training. Front Hum Neurosci 10:203CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Morton SM, Bastian AJ (2006) Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking. J Neurosci 26:9107–9116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pratt J, Chasteen AL, Abrams RA (1994) Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements. Psychol Aging 9:325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Quiton R, Roys S, Zhuo J, Keaser M, Gullapalli R, Greenspan J (2007) Age related changes in nociceptive processing in the human brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1097:175–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Raz N, Rodrigue K (2006) Differential aging of the brain: patterns, cognitive correlates and modifiers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:730–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruch FL (1934) The differentiative effects of age upon human learning. J Gen Psychol 11:261–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanes JN, Dimitrov B, Hallett M (1990) Motor learning in patients with cerebellar dysfunction. Brain 113:103–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schutz RW, Roy EA (1973) Absolute error: The devil in disguise. J Mot Behav 5:141–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Seidler RD (2006) Differential effects of age on sequence learning and sensorimotor adaptation. Brain Res Bull 70:337–346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Seidler RD (2007) Aging affects motor learning but not savings at transfer of learning. Learn Mem 14:17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Seidler RD, Alberts JL, Stelmach GE (2002) Changes in multi-joint performance with age. Mot Control 6:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seidler RD, Bernard JA, Burutolu TB, Fling BW, Gordon MT, Gwin JT, Kwak Y, Lipps DB (2010) Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:721–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Seidler-Dobrin RD, Stelmach GE (1998) Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Exp Brain Res 119:467–474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW (2010) Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci 33:89–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaffer S, Harrison A (2007) Aging of the somatosensory system: a translational perspective. Phys Ther 87:193–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Singh P, Jana S, Ghosal A, Murthy A (2016) Exploration of joint redundancy but not task space 13 variability facilitates supervised motor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:14414–14419CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith MA, Shadmehr R (2005) Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington’s disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 93:2809–2821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Spengler F, Godde B, Dinse H (1995) Effects of ageing on topographic organization of somatosensory cortex. Neuroreport 6:469–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Spirduso W (1975) Reaction and movement time as a function of age and physical activity level. J Gerontol 30:435–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Swash M, Fox KP (1972) The effect of age on human skeletal muscle studies of the morphology and innervation of muscle spindles. J Neurol Sci 16:417–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742–747CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Trojaborg W (1976) Motor and sensory conduction in the musculocutaneous nerve. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 39:890–899CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ (2007) Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol 98:54–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Vaziri S, Diedrichsen J, Shadmehr R (2006) Why does the brain predict sensory consequences of oculomotor commands? Optimal integration of the predicted and the actual sensory feedback. J Neurosci 26:4188–4197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Verhaeghen P, Salthouse T (1997) Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychol Bull 122:231–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Verschueren SM, Brumagne S, Swinnen SP, Cordo PJ (2002) The effect of aging on dynamic position sense at the ankle. Behav Brain Res 136:593–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang J, Sainburg RL (2006) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations depends on handedness. Exp Brain Res 175:223–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang J, Przybyla A, Wuebbenhorst K, Haaland KY, Sainburg RL (2011) Aging reduces asymmetries in interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 210:283–290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang J, Lei Y, Binder JR (2015) Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms. J Neurophysiol 113:2302–2308CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang J, D’Amato A, Bambrough J, Swartz AM, Miller NE (2016) A positive association between active lifestyle and hemispheric lateralization for motor control and learning in older adults. Exp Brain Res 314:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warabi T, Noda H, Kato T (1986) Effect of aging on sensorimotor functions of eye and hand movements. Exp Neurol 92:686–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wei K, Körding K (2010) Uncertainty of feedback and state estimation determines the speed of motor adaptation. Front Comput Neurosci 4:11PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Wishart LR, Lee TD (1997) Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill. Percept Mot Skills 84:1107–1122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wolpe N, Ingram JN, Tsvetanov KA, Geerligs L, Kievit RA, Henson RN, Wolpert DM, Rowe JB (2016) Ageing increases reliance on sensorimotor prediction through structural and functional differences in frontostriatal circuits. Nat Commun 7: 13034CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR (2011) Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:739–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wong JD, Kistemaker DA, Chin A, Gribble PL (2012) Can proprioceptive training improve motor learning? J Neurophysiol 108:3313–3321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu HG, Miyamoto YR, Castro LN, Ölveczky BP, Smith MA (2014) Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability. Nat Neurosci 17:312–321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure ParalysisUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations