Temperature influences perception of the length of a wielded object via effortful touch
Individuals can perceive the properties of an attached or grasped object by wielding it through muscular effort—an ability referred to as dynamic or effortful touch. Sensitivity to the forces required to move such objects and to the resulting global patterns of tissue deformation underlies such perception. Given that perception via dynamic touch is movement-based, we hypothesized that manipulations that affect the ability to produce and control muscular movements might affect perception via dynamic touch. Cooling muscles from 40 to 10 °C impedes the development and transmission of muscular force and diminishes muscle stretch-reflex sensitivity. Accordingly, we anticipated that changes in hand temperature would alter the ability to detect patterns of tissue deformation and thus perception of the properties of wielded objects. In two experiments, participants wielded dowels with different lengths and rotational inertias (Experiment 1) and objects with identical lengths and different rotational inertias (Experiment 2). They reported perceived lengths of these objects, in the absence of vision, in cool (~ 10 °C), neutral (~ 30 °C), and warm temperature conditions (~ 40 °C). Actual length predicted perceived length of the dowels (Experiment 1), and rotational inertia predicted perceived length of the objects (Experiment 2); perceived lengths were longer in the warm condition than in the cool condition. In consideration of known temperature-induced changes in tissue structure and function, our results support the hypothesis that comparable processes underlie the control of movement and perception via dynamic touch.
KeywordsDynamic touch Effortful touch Haptic perception Invariant Proprioception
MM and KMN conceived and designed research; MM performed experiments; MM analyzed data; MM and JBW interpreted results of experiments; MM prepared figures; MM, JBW, and KMN edited and revised manuscript; MM, JBW, and KMN approved final version of manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
- Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movement. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Bernstein NA, Latash ML, Turvey MT (1996) Dexterity and its development. Lawrence Erlbaum, MarwahGoogle Scholar
- Carello C, Turvey MT (2000) Rotational invariance and dynamic touch. In: Heller MA (ed) Touch, representation and blindness. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 27–66Google Scholar
- Gibson JJ (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Jarmey C, Sharkey J (2003) The concise book of muscles. North Atlantic Books, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Mountcastle VB (2005) The sensory hand. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Schleip R, Findley T, Huijing P (2012) Fascia: the tensional network of the human body. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- van der Wal JC, Drukker J (1988) The occurrence of muscle spindles in relation to the architecture of the connective tissues in the lateral cubical region of the rat. In: Hník P, Soukup T, Vejsada R, Zelená J (eds) Mechanoreceptors: development, structure, and function. Springer, Boston, pp 345–346Google Scholar