Putting the brakes on the brakes: negative emotion disrupts cognitive control network functioning and alters subsequent stopping ability
- 621 Downloads
The ability to inhibit unwanted responses is critical for effective control of behavior, and inhibition failures can have disastrous consequences in real-world situations. Here, we examined how prior exposure to negative emotional stimuli affects the response-stopping network. Participants performed the stop-signal task, which relies on inhibitory control processes, after they viewed blocks of either negatively emotional or neutral images. In Experiment 1, we found that neural activity was reduced following negative image viewing. When participants were required to inhibit responding after neutral image viewing, we observed activation consistent with previous studies using the stop-signal task. However, when participants were required to inhibit responding after negative image viewing, we observed reductions in the activation of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex, and parietal cortex. Furthermore, analysis of neural connectivity during stop-signal task blocks indicated that across participants, emotion-induced changes in behavioral performance were associated with changes in functional connectivity, such that greater behavioral impairment after negative image viewing was associated with greater weakening of connectivity. In Experiment 2, we collected behavioral data from a larger sample of participants and found that stopping performance was impaired after negative image viewing, as seen in longer stop-signal reaction times. The present results demonstrate that negative emotional events can prospectively disrupt the neural network supporting response inhibition.
KeywordsCognitive control Emotion Functional connectivity Mood Prefrontal cortex Neural network
This research was supported by a National Science Foundation graduate research fellowship to T. K. Patterson (DGE-0707424), start-up funds provided by the University of Oregon to E. T. Berkman, a James S. McDonnell Foundation grant to R. A. Poldrack, and a National Science Foundation grant to B. J. Knowlton (BCS-0848246). We thank Lauren Skellern, Darren Liu, Chloe Su, and Carolyn Prina for assistance with data collection and Katherine Misogas for assistance with data analysis. We also thank Jeanette Mumford for advising on the neuroimaging analyses.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2007a) Non-linear optimisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA1. FMRIB Centre, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith SM (2007b) Non-linear registration aka spatial normalisation. FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. FMRIB Centre, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Chamberlain SR, Hampshire A, Muller U, Rubia K, del Campo N, Craig K, Regenthal R, Suckling J, Roiser JP, Grant JE, Bullmore ET, Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (2009) Atomoxetine modulates right inferior frontal activation during inhibitory control: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry 65:550–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chambers CD, Bellgrove MA, Stokes MG, Henderson TR, Garavan H, Robertson IH, Morris AP, Mattingley JB (2006) Executive “brake failure” following deactivation of human frontal lobe. J Cognit Neurosci 18:444–455Google Scholar
- Cohen JR, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD (2013) Intentional and incidental self-control in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT (eds) Principles of frontal lobe function, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 417–440Google Scholar
- Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (2008) International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical report A-8. University of Florida, GainsvilleGoogle Scholar
- Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 189–239Google Scholar
- Worsley KJ (2001) Statistical analysis of activation images. In: Jezzard P, Matthews PM, Smith SM (eds) Functional MRI: an introduction to methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–270Google Scholar