Skip to main content

Coordination of muscles to control the footpath during over-ground walking in neurologically intact individuals and stroke survivors

A Correction to this article was published on 24 March 2018

This article has been updated


The central nervous system (CNS) is believed to use the abundant degrees of freedom of muscles and joints to stabilize a particular task variable important for task success, such as footpath during walking. Stroke survivors often demonstrate impaired balance and high incidences of falls due to increased footpath variability during walking. In the current study, we use the uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach to investigate the role of motor abundance in stabilizing footpath during swing phase in healthy individuals and stroke survivors. Twelve stroke survivors and their age- and gender-matched controls walked over-ground at self-selected speed, while electromyographic and kinematic data were collected. UCM analysis partitioned the variance of muscle groups (modes) across gait cycles into “good variance” (i.e., muscle mode variance leading to a consistent or stable footpath) or “bad variance” (i.e., muscle mode variance resulting in an inconsistent footpath). Both groups had a significantly greater “good” than “bad” variance, suggesting that footpath is an important task variable stabilized by the CNS during walking. The relative variance difference that reflects normalized difference between “good” and “bad” variance was not significantly different between groups. However, significant differences in muscle mode structure and muscle mode activation timing were observed between the two groups. Our results suggest that though the mode structure and activation timing are altered, stroke survivors may retain their ability to explore the redundancy within the neuromotor system and utilize it to stabilize the footpath.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Change history

  • 24 March 2018

    In the original publication of the article, the corrections for the typographical errors in the equations for variance that affects the footpath (VORT) and the total variance (VTOT) should be as following:


  1. Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2009) Variability in spatiotemporal step characteristics and its relationship to walking performance post-stroke. Gait Posture 29:408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauby CE, Kuo AD (2000) Active control of lateral balance in human walking. J Biomech 33:1433–1440

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Begg R, Best R, Dell’Oro L, Taylor S (2007) Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. Gait Posture 25:191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein NA (1967) The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Black DP, Smith BA, Wu J, Ulrich BD (2007) Uncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome. Exp Brain Res 183:511–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cirstea M, Levin MF (2000) Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 123:940–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark DJ, Ting LH, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2010) Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. J Neurophysiol 103:844–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cockrell JR, Folstein MF (2002) Mini-mental state examination. Geriatr Psychiatry 140

  9. Coscia M, Monaco V, Martelloni C, Rossi B, Chisari C, Micera S (2015) Muscle synergies and spinal maps are sensitive to the asymmetry induced by a unilateral stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 12:39

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Danna-dos-Santos A, Slomka K, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2007) Muscle modes and synergies during voluntary body sway. Exp Brain Res 179:533–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Freitas SMSF, Scholz JP, Stehman AJ (2007) Effect of motor planning on use of motor abundance. Neurosci Lett 417:66–71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Freitas SMSF, Gera G, Scholz JP (2011) Timing variability of reach trajectories in left versus right hemisphere stroke. Brain Res 1419:19–33

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfand I, Tsetlin M (1966) On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In: Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems. Moscow Nauka (in Russian, published in English in 1971 by Cambridge MA: MIT Press), pp 9–26

  14. Gera G, Freitas S, Latash M, Monahan K, Schoner G, Scholz J (2010) Motor abundance contributes to resolving multiple kinematic task constraints. Mot Control 14:83–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grasso R, Bianchi L, Lacquaniti F (1998) Motor patterns for human gait: backward versus forward locomotion. J Neurophysiol 80:1868–1885

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grasso R, Ivanenko YP, Zago M et al (2004) Distributed plasticity of locomotor pattern generators in spinal cord injured patients. Brain 127:1019–1034. doi:10.1093/brain/awh115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ivanenko Y, Grasso R, Macellari V, Lacquaniti F (2002) Control of foot trajectory in human locomotion: role of ground contact forces in simulated reduced gravity. J Neurophysiol 87:3070–3089

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ivanenko Y, Poppele R, Lacquaniti F (2009) Distributed neural networks for controlling human locomotion: lessons from normal and SCI subjects. Brain Res Bull 78:13–21

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Exp Brain Res 152:281–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2004) Muscle modes during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: effect of instability and additional support. Exp Brain Res 157:18–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krishnan C, Ranganathan R, Kantak SS, Dhaher YY, Rymer WZ (2012) Active robotic training improves locomotor function in a stroke survivor. J Neuroeng Rehabil 9:57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Krishnan C, Kotsapouikis D, Dhaher YY, Rymer WZ (2013a) Reducing robotic guidance during robot-assisted gait training improves gait function: a case report on a stroke survivor. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:1202–1206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krishnan V, Rosenblatt NJ, Latash ML, Grabiner MD (2013b) The effects of age on stabilization of the mediolateral trajectory of the swing foot. Gait Posture 38:923–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kutch JJ, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2012) Challenges and new approaches to proving the existence of muscle synergies of neural origin. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002434

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Latash ML, Gorniak S, Zatsiorsky VM (2008) Hierarchies of synergies in human movements. Kinesiology 40:29

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Papi E, Rowe PJ, Pomeroy VM (2015) Analysis of gait within the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis: stabilisation of the centre of mass during gait. J Biomech 48:324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pohl PS, Duncan PW, Perera S, Liu W, Lai SM, Studenski S, Long J (2002) Influence of stroke-related impairments on performance in 6-minute walk test. J Rehabil Res Dev 39:439–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ranganathan R, Krishnan C (2012) Extracting synergies in gait: using EMG variability to evaluate control strategies. J Neurophysiol 108:1537–1544

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Reisman DS, Scholz JP (2003) Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis. Brain 126:2510–2527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scholz JP, Schoner G (1999) The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task. Exp Brain Res 126:289–306

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Srivastava S, Kao PC, Kim SH et al (2014) Assist-as-needed robot-aided gait training improves walking function in individuals following stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng

  32. Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 93:609–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tresch MC, Cheung VC, d’Avella A (2006) Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. J Neurophysiol 95:2199–2212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tropea P, Monaco V, Coscia M, Posteraro F, Micera S (2013) Effects of early and intensive neuro-rehabilitative treatment on muscle synergies in acute post-stroke patients: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10:0003–0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tseng Y-W, Scholz JP, Schöner G, Hotchkiss L (2003) Effect of accuracy constraint on joint coordination during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 149:276–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2006) Muscle synergies involved in preparation to a step made under the self-paced and reaction time instructions. Clin Neurophysiol 117:41–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Winter DA (1992) Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. Phys Ther 72:45–53

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the Delaware Rehabilitation Institute (DRI) research core in helping with recruitment, scheduling, and clinical evaluations of the subjects.


This work was supported by Grant R01HD038582 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shraddha Srivastava.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

John P. Scholz: Deceased.

A correction to this article is available online at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, S., Kao, PC., Reisman, D.S. et al. Coordination of muscles to control the footpath during over-ground walking in neurologically intact individuals and stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res 234, 1903–1914 (2016).

Download citation


  • Stroke
  • Locomotion
  • Footpath variability
  • Uncontrolled manifold hypothesis