Cerebellum as a forward but not inverse model in visuomotor adaptation task: a tDCS-based and modeling study
Despite several pieces of evidence, which suggest that the human brain employs internal models for motor control and learning, the location of these models in the brain is not yet clear. In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to manipulate right cerebellar function, while subjects adapt to a visuomotor task. We investigated the effect of this manipulation on the internal forward and inverse models by measuring two kinds of behavior: generalization of training in one direction to neighboring directions (as a proxy for inverse models) and localization of the hand position after movement without visual feedback (as a proxy for forward model). The experimental results showed no effect of cerebellar tDCS on generalization, but significant effect on localization. These observations support the idea that the cerebellum is a possible brain region for internal forward, but not inverse model formation. We also used a realistic human head model to calculate current density distribution in the brain. The result of this model confirmed the passage of current through the cerebellum. Moreover, to further explain some observed experimental results, we modeled the visuomotor adaptation process with the help of a biologically inspired method known as population coding. The effect of tDCS was also incorporated in the model. The results of this modeling study closely match our experimental data and provide further evidence in line with the idea that tDCS manipulates FM’s function in the cerebellum.
KeywordsCerebellum Visuomotor adaptation Internal forward model Internal inverse model tDCS Population coding Finite element analysis
The authors would like to thank Prof. Jun Izawa for his valuable comments throughout this research and also Dimitrios Palidis for his great comments in editing the manuscript grammatically.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
I hereby confirm that there is no conflict of interest in this research.
- Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M (2009) Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul 2(4):201.e201–207.e201. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferrucci R, Marceglia S, Vergari M, Cogiamanian F, Mrakic-Sposta S, Mameli F, Priori A (2008) Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 20(9):1687–1697. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20112 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrucci R, Giannicola G, Rosa M, Fumagalli M, Boggio PS, Hallett M, Priori A (2012) Cerebellum and processing of negative facial emotions: cerebellar transcranial DC stimulation specifically enhances the emotional recognition of facial anger and sadness. Cogn Emot 26(5):786–799. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.619520 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Laurens, J., Meng, H., & Angelaki, D. E. (2013). Computation of linear acceleration through an internal model in the macaque cerebellum. Nature neuroscience Google Scholar
- Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W, Tergau F (2003b) Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci 15(4):619–626. doi: 10.1162/089892903321662994 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science-New York then Washington, 1880–1880Google Scholar
- Yavari F, Towhidkhah F (2014) Modeling the effect of explicit information in visuomotor adaptation. Paper presented at the 22nd Iranian Conference on electrical engineering (ICEE)Google Scholar