Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 233, Issue 11, pp 3323–3332 | Cite as

Inertial torque during reaching directly impacts grip-force adaptation to weightless objects

  • T. Giard
  • F. Crevecoeur
  • J. McIntyre
  • J.-L. Thonnard
  • P. LefèvreEmail author
Research Article


A hallmark of movement control expressed by healthy humans is the ability to gradually improve motor performance through learning. In the context of object manipulation, previous work has shown that the presence of a torque load has a direct impact on grip-force control, characterized by a significantly slower grip-force adjustment across lifting movements. The origin of this slower adaptation rate remains unclear. On the one hand, information about tangential constraints during stationary holding may be difficult to extract in the presence of a torque. On the other hand, inertial torque experienced during movement may also potentially disrupt the grip-force adjustments, as the dynamical constraints clearly differ from the situation when no torque load is present. To address the influence of inertial torque loads, we instructed healthy adults to perform visually guided reaching movements in weightlessness while holding an unbalanced object relative to the grip axis. Weightlessness offered the possibility to remove gravitational constraints and isolate the effect of movement-related feedback on grip force adjustments. Grip-force adaptation rates were compared with a control group who manipulated a balanced object without any torque load and also in weightlessness. Our results clearly show that grip-force adaptation in the presence of a torque load is significantly slower, which suggests that the presence of torque loads experienced during movement may alter our internal estimates of how much force is required to hold an unbalanced object stable. This observation may explain why grasping objects around the expected location of the center of mass is such an important component of planning and control of manipulation tasks.


Grip-force Torque load Weightlessness Adaptation Motor control 



The authors thank the subjects for their participation and A. Barrea, D. Cordova Bulens, B. Delhaye and V. Théate for their help during the parabolic flight campaigns.


This research was supported by a grant from the European Space Agency (ESA), PRODEX and IAP (Belspo), and ARC (Belgium). J. McIntyre is supported by Université Paris Descartes, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, the Conseil Régional Ile de France and by a grant from the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES).

Compliance with ethical standards


The scientific responsibility for this work rests with its authors.

Supplementary material

221_2015_4400_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (7 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 6 kb)


  1. Augurelle A-S, Penta M, White O, Thonnard J-L (2003) The effects of a change in gravity on the dynamics of prehension. Exp Brain Res 148:533–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cornbleet PJ, Gochman N (1979) Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis. Clin Chem 25:432–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crevecoeur F, Thonnard JL, Lefèvre P (2009) Forward models of inertial loads in weightlessness. Neuroscience 161:589–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crevecoeur F, McIntyre J, Thonnard J-L, Lefèvre P (2010a) Movement stability under uncertain internal models of dynamics. J Neurophysiol 104:1301–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crevecoeur F, Thonnard J-L, Lefèvre P (2010b) Sensorimotor mapping for anticipatory grip force modulation. J Neurophysiol 104:1401–1408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Crevecoeur F, Giard T, Thonnard J-L, Lefèvre P (2011) Adaptive control of grip force to compensate for static and dynamic torques during object manipulation. J Neurophysiol 106:2973–2981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Danion F, Diamond JS, Flanagan JR (2012) The role of haptic feedback when manipulating nonrigid objects. J Neurophysiol 107:433–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Danion F, Diamond JS, Flanagan JR (2013) Separate contributions of kinematic and kinetic errors to trajectory and grip force adaptation when transporting novel hand-held loads. J Neurosci 33:2229–2236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. De Gregorio M, Santos VJ (2013) Precision grip responses to unexpected rotational perturbations scale with axis of rotation. J Biomech 46:1098–1103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Flanagan JR, Tresilian JR (1994) Grip load force coupling—a general control strategy for transporting objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:944–957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1993) Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 95:131–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1995) The stability of precision grip forces during cyclic arm movements with a hand-held load. Exp Brain Res 105:455–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Flanagan JR, Wing AM (1997) The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. J Neurosci 17:1519–1528PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Flanagan JR, Tresilian J, Wing AM (1993) Coupling of grip force and load force during arm movements with grasped objects. Neurosci Lett 152:53–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM (2003) Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 13:146–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Flanagan JR, Bowman MC, Johansson RS (2006) Control strategies in object manipulation tasks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 16:650–659CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodwin A, Jenmalm P, Johansson RS (1998) Control of grip force when tilting objects: effect of curvature of grasped surfaces and applied tangential torque. J Neurosci 18:10724–10734PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermsdörfer J, Marquardt C, Philipp J (2000) Moving weightless objects. Exp Brain Res 132:52–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Johansson R, Westling G (1984) Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res 56:550–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kinoshita H, Bäckström L, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (1997) Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with a precision grip. J Neurophysiol 78:1619–1630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kutz DF, Wölfel A, Timmann D, Kolb FP (2009) Dynamic torque during a precision grip task comparable to picking a raspberry. J Neurosci Methods 177:80–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nowak D, Hermsdörfer J, Schneider E, Glasauer S (2004) Moving objects in a rotating environment: rapid prediction of Coriolis and centrifugal force perturbations. Exp Brain Res 157:241–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Westling G, Johansson RS (1984) Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 53:277–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. White O, McIntyre J, Augurelle A-S, Thonnard J-L (2005) Do novel gravitational environments alter the grip-force/load-force coupling at the fingertips? Exp Brain Res 163:324–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wing AM, Lederman SJ (1998) Anticipating load torques produced by voluntary movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:1571–1581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Giard
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Crevecoeur
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. McIntyre
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • J.-L. Thonnard
    • 2
    • 6
  • P. Lefèvre
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.ICTEAMUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.IoNSUniversité catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.CNRS, Centre d’Etudes de la SensorimotricitéUniversité Paris DescartesParisFrance
  4. 4.Fundacion Tecnalia Research & InnovationSan SebastiánSpain
  5. 5.IKERBASQUE Research FoundationBilbaoSpain
  6. 6.Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine DepartmentUniversité Catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations