Abstract
The present study was designed to investigate the incorporation of tools into the human body schema. Previous research on tool use suggests that through physical interaction with a tool, the representation of the body is adjusted to incorporate or “embody” the tool. The present experiment was conducted to test the limb-specific nature of tool embodiment. Participants were presented with images of a person holding a rake and executed hand- and foot-press responses to colored targets superimposed on the hand, foot, and rake of the image. This task was completed before and after moving a ball around a course with a hand-held rake. Consistent with previous research, a body-part compatibility effect emerged—response times (RTs) were shorter when the responding limb and target location were compatible (e.g., hand responses to targets on the hand) than when they were incompatible (e.g., hand responses to targets on the foot). Of greater theoretical relevance, hand RTs to targets presented on the hand were shorter than those to targets on the rake prior to experience, but were not different after completing the rake task. The post-experience similarity in hand RTs emerged because there was a significant reduction in RTs to targets on the rake following use. There was no significant pre-/post-experience change in hand RTs to targets on the hand or, importantly, for any response executed by the foot. These results provide new evidence that a tool is embodied in a limb-specific manner and is represented within the body schema as if it was an extension of the limb.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.



References
Bach P, Peatfield A, Tipper S (2007) Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception. Exp Brain Res 178:509–517
Berti A, Frassinetti F (2000) When far becomes near: re-mapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 12:415–420
Bonifazi S, Farnè A, Rinaldesi L, Làdavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space through tool use: spatial extension or shift of the multi-sensory area. J Neuropsychol 1:101–114
Bourgeois J, Farnè A, Coello Y (2014) Costs and benefits of tool-use on the perception of reachable space. Acta Psychol 148:91–95
Catmur C, Heyes C (2011) Time course analyses confirm independence of imitative and spatial compatibility. J Exp Psychol Hum 37:409–421
Colby C (1998) Action-oriented spatial reference frames in cortex. Neuron 20:15–24
di Pellegrino G, Làdavas E, Farnè A (1997) Seeing where your hands are. Nature 338:730
Downing PE, Jiang YH, Shuman M, Kanwisher N (2001) A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293:2470–2473
Farnè A, Làdavas E (2000) Dynamic size-change of hand peri-personal space following tool use. NeuroReport 11:1645–1649
Farnè A, Iriki A, Làdavas E (2005) Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with crossmodal extinction. Neuropsychologia 43:238–248
Farnè A, Serino A, Làdavas E (2007) Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space following tool use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 43:436–443
Graziano M, Gross C (1993) A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp Brain Res 97:96–109
Graziano M, Gross C, Yap G (1994) Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science 266:1054–1057
Imamizu H, Pütz B, Yoshioka T, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Kawato M, Mivauchi S (2000) Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403:192–195
Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport 7:2325–2330
Kao K, Goodale M (2009) Enhanced detection of visual targets on the hand and familiar tools. Neuropsychologia 47:2454–2463
Maravita A, Iriki A (2004) Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 8:79–86
Maravita A, Husain M, Clarke K, Driver J (2001) Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 35:580–585
Mazalek A, Welsh TN, Nitsche M, Reid C, Clifton P, Leighton F, Tan K (2013) Reach across the boundary: evidence of physical tool appropriation following virtual practice. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (TEI ‘13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 155–158
Peelen MV, Downing PE (2007) The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:636–648
Rademaker RL, Wu D, Bloem IM, Sack AT (2014) Intensive tool-practice and skillfulness facilitate the extension of body representations in humans. Neuropsychologia 56:196–203
Reed C, Grubb J, Steele C (2006) Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. J Exp Psychol Hum 32:166–177
Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M (1998) The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 106:283–296
Thomas R, Press C, Haggard P (2006) Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychol 121:317–330
Tomasino B, Weiss PH, Fink GR (2012) Imagined tool-use in near and far space modulates the extra-striate body area. Neuropsychologia 50:2467–2476
Vallesi A, Mapelli D, Schiff S, Amodio P, Umiltà C (2005) Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? Cognition 96:B33–B43
Welsh TN, McDougall L, Paulson SD (2014) The personification of animals and the “animalization” of humans: initial insights into cross-species body and action representation. Cognition 132:398–415
Wiggett A, Hudson M, Tipper SP, Downing PE (2011) Learning associations between action and perception: effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial priming. Brain Cogn 76:87–96
Wiggett A, Downing PE, Tipper SP (2013) Facilitation and interference in spatial and body reference frames. Exp Brain Res 225:119–131
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Canada Research Chair program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jovanov, K., Clifton, P., Mazalek, A. et al. The limb-specific embodiment of a tool following experience. Exp Brain Res 233, 2685–2694 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4342-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4342-5
Keywords
- Tool use
- Body schema
- Embodiment
- Reaction time