Abstract
Motor imagery relies strongly on motor representations. Currently, it is widely accepted that both the imagery and execution of actions share the same neural representations (Jeannerod, Neuroimage 14:S103–S109, 2001). Comparing mental with actual movement durations opens a window through which to examine motor representations and how they relate to cognitive motor processes. The present experiment examined mental durations reported by participants standing upright who imagined walking either with or without an additional load while actually carrying or not carrying that same load. Results showed a robust effect of longer durations when imagining the additional load during mental walking, whereas physical walking with an additional load did not extend movement durations accordingly. However, experiencing an actual load during imagery did not influence mental durations substantially. This dissociation of load-related effects can be interpreted as being due to an interaction of motor processes and their cognitive representation along with a reduction in neural activity in vestibular and somatosensory areas during imagery of locomotion. It is argued that this effect might be specific to locomotion and not generalize to a broader range of movements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakker M, de Lange FP, Stevens JA, Toni I, Bloem BR (2007) Motor imagery of gait: a quantitative approach. Exp Brain Res 179:497–504. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0807-x
Bakker M, de Lange FP, Helmich RC, Scheeringa R, Bloem BR, Toni I (2008) Cerebral correlates of motor imagery of normal and precision gait. Neuroimage 41:998–1010. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.020
Boulton H, Mitra S (2013) Body posture modulates imagined arm movements and responds to them. J Neurophysiol 110:2617–2626. doi:10.1152/jn.00488.2013
Cerritelli B, Maruff P, Wilson P, Currie J (2000) The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 108:91–96. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00138-2
Courtine G, Papaxanthis C, Gentili R, Pozzo T (2004) Gait-dependent motor memory facilitation in covert movement execution. Cogn Brain Res 22:67–75. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.07.008
De Lange FP, Helmich RC, Toni I (2006) Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 33:609–617. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.017
Decety J, Michel F (1989) Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain Cogn 11:87–97. doi:10.1016/0278-2626(89)90007-9
Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1989) The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 34:35–42. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(89)80088-9
Decety J, Jeannerod M, Durozard D, Baverel G (1993) Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man. J Physiol 461:549–563
Dietz V (2002) Proprioception and locomotor disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:781–790. doi:10.1038/nrn939
Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A (1994) Does mental practice enhance performance? J Appl Psychol 79:481–492. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.79.4.481
Frigon A, Rossignol S (2006) Experiments and models of sensorimotor interactions during locomotion. Biol Cybern 95:607–627. doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0129-x
Gabbard C, Lee J, Gacola P (2013) Role of working memory in transformation of visual and motor representations for use in mental simulation. Cogn Neurosci 4:210–216. doi:10.1080/17588928.2013.820180
Grillner S (2006) Biological pattern generation: the cellular and computational logic of networks in motion. Neuron 52:751–766. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.008
Guillot A, Haguenauer M, Dittmar A, Collet C (2005) Effect of a fatiguing protocol on motor imagery accuracy. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:186–190. doi:10.1007/s00421-005-1400-x
Guillot A, di Rienzo F, MacIntyre T, Moran A, Collet C (2012) Imagining is not doing but involves specific motor commands: a review of experimental data related to motor inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci 6:247. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00247
Hall CR, Martin KE (1997) Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the movement imagery questionnaire. J Ment Imag 21:143–154
Horak FB, Nashner LM (1986) Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support surface configurations. J Neurophysiol 55:1369–1381
Jahn K, Deutschländer A, Stephan T, Strupp M, Wiesmann M, Brandt T (2004) Brain activation patterns during imagined stance and locomotion in functional magnet resonance imaging. Neuroimage 22:1722–1731. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.017
Jeannerod M (1995) Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia 33:1419–1432. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00073-C
Jeannerod M (2001) Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14:S103–S109. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
La Fougère C, Zwergal A, Rominger A, Förster S, Fesl G, Dieterich M, Jahn K (2010) Real versus imagined locomotion: an intraindividual [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison. Neuroimage 50:1589–1598. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.060
Lorey B, Bischoff M, Pilgramm S, Stark R, Munzert J, Zentgraf K (2009) The embodied nature of motor imagery: the influence of posture and perspective. Exp Brain Res 194:233–243. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1693-1
Lorey B, Pilgramm S, Walter B, Stark R, Munzert J, Zentgraf K (2010) Your mind’s hand: motor imagery of pointing movements with different accuracy. Neuroimage 49:3239–3247. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.038
Lotze M, Halsband U (2006) Motor imagery. J Physiol (Paris) 99:386–395. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012
Lotze M, Zentgraf K (2010) Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery. In: Guillot A, Collet C (eds) The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 31–45
Louis M, Collet C, Champeley S, Guillot A (2012) Differences in motor imagery time when predicting task duration in alpine skiers and equestrian riders. Res Q Exerc Sport 83:86–93
Maruff P, Wilson P, Trebilcock M, Currie J (1999) Abnormalities of imagined motor sequences in children with developmental coordination disorder. Neuropsychologia 37:1317–1324
Mulder T (2007) Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm 114:1265–1278. doi:10.1007/s00702-007-0763-z
Munzert J (2002) Temporal accuracy of mentally simulated transport movements. Percept Mot Skills 94:307–318
Munzert J (2008) Does level of expertise influence imagined durations in open skills? Played versus imagined durations of badminton sequences. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 6:24–38
Munzert J, Zentgraf K (2009) Motor imagery and its implications for understanding the motor system. In: Raab M, Johnson JG, Heekeren HR (eds) Progress in brain research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 219–229. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01318-1
Munzert J, Lorey B, Zentgraf K (2009) Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 60:306–326. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.024
Nashner LM (1976) Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture. Exp Brain Res 26:59–72
Papaxanthis C, Schieppati M, Gentili R, Pozzo T (2002) Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res 143:447–452. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1012-1
Reed CL (2002) Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Mem Cogn 30:1169–1178
Rieger M (2012) Motor imagery in typing: effects of typing style and action familiarity. Psychon Bull Rev 19:101–107. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0178-6
Rossignol S, Dubuc R, Gossard J-P (2006) Dynamic sensorimotor interactions in locomotion. Physiol Rev 8:89–154. doi:10.1152/00028.2005
Saimpont A, Maoulin F, Tousignant B, Jackson PL (2012) The influence of body configuration on motor imagery of walking in younger and older adults. Neuroscience 222:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.066
Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2011) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 5th edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH (1985) The growth of stability: postural control from a developmental perspective. J Mot Behav 17:131–147
Slifkin AB (2008) High loads induce differences between actual and imagined movement duration. Exp Brain Res 185:297–307. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1154-2
Stevens JA (2005) Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition 95:329–350. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.008
Taylor C, Heglund N, McMahon T, Looney T (1980) Energetic cost of generating muscular force during running. J Exp Biol 86:9–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Munzert, J., Blischke, K. & Krüger, B. Motor imagery of locomotion with an additional load: actual load experience does not affect differences between physical and mental durations. Exp Brain Res 233, 809–816 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4156-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4156-x