A mechanism for decision rule discrimination by supplementary eye field neurons
- 251 Downloads
A decision to select an action from alternatives is often guided by rules that flexibly map sensory inputs to motor outputs when certain conditions are satisfied. However, the neural mechanisms underlying rule-based decision making remain poorly understood. Two complementary types of neurons in the supplementary eye field (SEF) of macaques have been identified that modulate activity differentially to interpret rules in an ocular go–nogo task, which stipulates that the animal either visually pursue a moving object if it intersects a visible zone (‘go’), or maintain fixation if it does not (‘nogo’). These neurons discriminate between go and nogo rule-states by increasing activity to signal their preferred (agonist) rule-state and decreasing activity to signal their non-preferred (antagonist) rule-state. In the current study, we found that SEF neurons decrease activity in anticipation of the antagonist rule-state, and do so more rapidly when the rule-state is easier to predict. This rapid decrease in activity could underlie a process of elimination in which trajectories that do not invoke the preferred rule-state receive no further computational resources. Furthermore, discrimination between difficult and easy trials in the antagonist rule-state occurs prior to when discrimination within the agonist rule-state occurs. A winner-take-all like model that incorporates a pair of mutually inhibited integrators to accumulate evidence in favor of either the decision to pursue or the decision to continue fixation accounts for the observed neural phenomena.
KeywordsAbstract rule Accumulator model Decision making Primates Smooth pursuit Supplementary eye field
This study was supported by grants from National Eye Institute (EY-117720) and The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute.
- Deco G, Rolls ET, Albantakis L, Romo R (2012). Brain mechanisms for perceptual and reward-related decision-making. Progr Neurobiol. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.010
- Ditterich J (2010) A comparison between mechanisms of multi-alternative perceptual decision making: ability to explain human behavior, predictions for neurophysiology, and relationship with decision theory. Front Neurosci 4(184):1–24Google Scholar
- Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller EK (2001) Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 312:291–316Google Scholar
- Fukushima J, Akao T, Shichinohe N, Kurkin S, Kaneko CRS, Fukushima K (2011) Neuronal activity in the caudal frontal eye fields of monkeys during memory-based smooth pursuit eye movements: comparison with the supplementary eye fields. Cereb Cortex 21:1910–1924PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detectability and psychophysics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jantz JJ, Watanabe M, Everling S, Munoz DP (2013) Threshold mechanism for saccade initiation in the frontal eye field and superior colliculus. J NeurophysiolGoogle Scholar
- MacMillan NA, Creelman CD (1991) Detection theory: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Ratcliff R, Cherian A, Segraves MA (2003) A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. J neurophysiol 90(3):1392–1407Google Scholar
- Ratcliff R, Hasegawa YT, Hasegawa RP, Smith PL, Segraves MA (2007) Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task. J neurophysiol 97(2):1756–1774Google Scholar
- Zhang J (2012) The effects of evidence bounds on decision-making: theoretical and empirical developments. Front Psychol 3Google Scholar