Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures

Experimental Brain Research volume 232, pages 975–984 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

The study assessed the ability of the central nervous system (CNS) to use echoic information from sensory substitution devices (SSDs) to rotate the shoulders and safely pass through apertures of different width. Ten visually normal participants performed this task with full vision, or blindfolded using an SSD to obtain information regarding the width of an aperture created by two parallel panels. Two SSDs were tested. Participants passed through apertures of +0, +18, +35 and +70 % of measured body width. Kinematic indices recorded movement time, shoulder rotation, average walking velocity across the trial, peak walking velocities before crossing, after crossing and throughout a whole trial. Analyses showed participants used SSD information to regulate shoulder rotation, with greater rotation associated with narrower apertures. Rotations made using an SSD were greater compared to vision, movement times were longer, average walking velocity lower and peak velocities before crossing, after crossing and throughout the whole trial were smaller, suggesting greater caution. Collisions sometimes occurred using an SSD but not using vision, indicating that substituted information did not always result in accurate shoulder rotation judgements. No differences were found between the two SSDs. The data suggest that spatial information, provided by sensory substitution, allows the relative position of aperture panels to be internally represented, enabling the CNS to modify shoulder rotation according to aperture width. Increased buffer space indicated by greater rotations (up to approximately 35 % for apertures of +18 % of body width) suggests that spatial representations are not as accurate as offered by full vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Auvray M, Myin E (2009) Perception with compensatory devices: from sensory substitution to sensorimotor extension. Cogn Sci 33:1036–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Auvray M, Hanneton S, O’Regan JK (2007) Learning to perceive with a visuo-auditory substitution system: localisation and object recognition with ‘The vOICe’. Perception 36:416–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie D, Limousin P, Peters A, Day BL (2010) Insights into the neural control of locomotion from walking through doorways in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 48:2750–2757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TC, Pinder SD, Burns CM (2011) What’s that sound? Distance determination and aperture passage from ultrasound echoes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 6:500–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Volder AG, Catalan-Ahumada M, Robert A et al (1999) Changes in occipital cortex activity in early blind humans using a sensory substitution device. Brain Res 826:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong CM, Au WW, Stamper SA (2007) Echo features used by human listeners to discriminate among objects that vary in material or wall thickness: implications for echolocating dolphins. J Acoust Soc Am 121:605–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diffrient N, Tilley A, Harman D (1981) Humanscale 1/2/3. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton RD (1992) Inherent problems of attempts to apply sonar and vibrotactile sensory aid technology to the perceptual needs of the blind. Optom Vis Sci 69:3–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer LW, Smith DL (1997) Adaptive technology. In: Blasch BB, Wiener WR, Welsh RL (eds) Foundations of orientation and mobility. AFB Press, New York, pp 231–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Fath AJ, Fajen BR (2011) Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture. Perception 40:887–904

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franchak JM, Celano EC, Adolph KE (2012) Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion. Exp Brain Res 223:301–310

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausfeld S, Power RP, Gorta A, Harris P (1982) Echo perception of shape and texture by sighted subjects. Percept Motor Skill 55:623–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes A (1984) Sonic Pathfinder: a programmable guidance aid for the blind. Electron Wireless W 90:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi T, Cinelli ME, Greig MA, Patla AE (2006a) Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: adaptation to artificially altered bodily states. Exp Brain Res 175:50–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higuchi T, Imanaka K, Patla AE (2006b) Action-oriented representation of peripersonal and extrapersonal space: insights from manual and locomotor actions. Jpn Psychol Res 48:126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes B (2001) Active artificial echolocation and the nonvisual perception of aperture passability. Hum Mov Sci 20:371–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay L (1964) An ultrasonic sensing probe as a mobility aid for the blind. Ultrasonics 2:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg WN (1962) Sonar system of the blind. Science 137:399–404

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JK, Zatorre RJ (2008) Generalized learning of visual-to-auditory substitution in sighted individuals. Brain Res 1242:263–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolarik AJ, Cirstea S, Pardhan S (2013a) Discrimination of virtual auditory distance using level and direct-to-reverberant ratio cues. J Acoust Soc Am 134:3395–3398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolarik AJ, Cirstea S, Pardhan S (2013b) Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues. Exp Brain Res 224:623–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolarik AJ, Pardhan S, Cirstea S, Moore BCJ (2013c) Using acoustic information to perceive room size: effects of blindness, room reverberation time, and stimulus. Perception 42:985–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent B, Christian TNA (2007) A sonar system modeled after spatial hearing and echolocating bats for blind mobility aid. Int J Phys Sci 2:104–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DN (1993) Body-environment coupling. In: Neisser U (ed) The perceived self: Ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 43–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Klatzky RL, Golledge RG, Cicinelli JG, Pellegrino JW, Fry PA (1993) Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:73–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mershon DH, Ballenger WL, Little AD, McMurtry PL, Buchanan JL (1989) Effects of room reflectance and background noise on perceived auditory distance. Perception 18:403–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan JK, Noë A (2001) A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 24:939–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philips G (2013) The miniguide ultrasonic mobility aid. GDP Research. http://www.gdp-research.com.au/minig_1.htm. Accessed 14 May 2013

  • Renier L, Collignon O, Poirier C et al (2005) Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision. Neuroimage 26:573–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rice CE, Feinstein SH (1965) Sonar system of the blind: size discrimination. Science 148:1107–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roentgen UR, Gelderblom GJ, Soede M, de Witte LP (2008) Inventory of electronic mobility aids for persons with visual impairments: a literature review. J Vis Impair Blind 102:702–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Roentgen UR, Gelderblom GJ, Soede M, de Witte LP (2009) The impact of electronic mobility devices for persons who are visually impaired: a systematic review of effects and effectiveness. J Vis Impair Blind 103:743–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum LD, Gordon MS, Jarquin L (2000) Echolocating distance by moving and stationary listeners. Ecol Psychol 12:181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkman BN, Nilsson ME (2010) Human echolocation: blind and sighted persons’ ability to detect sounds recorded in the presence of a reflecting object. Perception 39:483–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkman BN, Nilsson ME (2011) Human echolocation: pitch versus loudness information. Perception 40:840–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanucci JK, Geuss MN (2010) Duck! Scaling the height of a horizontal barrier to body height. Atten Percept Psychophys 72:1338–1349

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen TA, Pittenger JB (1995) Human echolocation as a basic form of perception and action. Ecol Psychol 7:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supa M, Cotzin M, Dallenbach KM (1944) “Facial vision”: the perception of obstacles by the blind. Am J Psychol 57:133–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng S, Puri A, Whitney D (2012) Ultrafine spatial acuity of blind expert human echolocators. Exp Brain Res 216:483–488. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2951-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler L, Arnott SR, Goodale MA (2011) Neural correlates of natural human echolocation in early and late blind echolocation experts. PLoS ONE 6:e20162. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020162

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer AL (1997) Visual guidance of passing under a barrier. Early Dev Parent 6:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren WH, Whang S (1987) Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:371–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmut K, Barnett AL (2010) Locomotor adjustments when navigating through apertures. Hum Mov Sci 29:289–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yavuzer G, Ergin S (2002) Effect of an arm sling on gait pattern in patients with hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:960–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor Melvyn Goodale, Takahiro Higuchi and an anonymous reviewer for very helpful comments that improved a previous version of this paper, and thank Anika Sharma for assistance in collecting and analysing data. The research was supported by the Vision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), Postgraduate Medical Institute at Anglia Ruskin University.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andrew J. Kolarik

    Present address: Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vision and Eye Research Unit (VERU), Postgraduate Medical Institute, Anglia Ruskin University, Eastings 204, East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK

    Andrew J. Kolarik, Matthew A. Timmis, Silvia Cirstea & Shahina Pardhan

  2. Sport and Exercise Sciences Research Group, Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK

    Matthew A. Timmis

  3. Department of Computing and Technology, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK

    Silvia Cirstea

Authors
  1. Andrew J. Kolarik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew A. Timmis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silvia Cirstea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shahina Pardhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Kolarik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolarik, A.J., Timmis, M.A., Cirstea, S. et al. Sensory substitution information informs locomotor adjustments when walking through apertures. Exp Brain Res 232, 975–984 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3809-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3809-5

Keywords

search

Navigation