Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research suggests that motor actions are intentionally generated by recollecting their sensory consequences. Whereas this has been shown to apply to visual or auditory consequences in the environment, surprisingly little is known about the contribution of immediate, body-related consequences, such as proprioceptive and tactile reafferences. Here, we report evidence for a contribution of vibrotactile reafferences to action selection by using a response–effect compatibility paradigm. More precisely, anticipating actions to cause spatially incompatible vibrations delayed responding to a small but reliable degree. Whereas this observation suggests functional equivalence of body-related and environment-related reafferences to action control, the future application of the described experimental procedure might reveal functional peculiarities of specific types of sensory consequences in action control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The first explicit distinction of body-related and environment-related effects appeared under the labels of “resident” and “remote” effects (James 1890; cf. Janczyk et al. 2009; Pfister and Kunde 2013). We consider the present wording of body- vs. environment-related effects to be more intuitive, however.

  2. Condition order had a rather pronounced impact on the RT data in this experiment. All reported effects, however, are significant (and slightly more pronounced) when controlling for order by including it as an additional between-subjects factor in the reported ANOVAs.

References

  • Ansorge U (2002) Spatial intention-response compatibility. Acta Psychol 109:285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badets A, Koch I, Toussaint L (2013) Role of an ideomotor mechanism in number processing. Exp Psychol 60:34–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutzi IB, Hommel B (2009) The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychol Res 73:425–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner B, Hommel B (2001) Effect anticipation and action control. J Exp Psychol Hum 27:229–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frings C, Rothermund K, Wentura D (2007) Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets. Q J Exp Psychol 60:1367–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frings C, Amendt A, Spence C (2011) When seeing doesn’t matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted. J Exp Psychol Hum 37:1174–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frings C, Larra M, Gräbener A, Moeller B, Schächinger H (2013a) Stress disrupts distractor-based retrieval of SR episodes. Biol Psychol 93:58–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frings C, Moeller B, Rothermund K (2013b) Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated. Atten Percept Psychophys 75:700–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaschler R, Nattkemper D (2012) Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation. Frontiers Psychol 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00578

  • Giesen C, Rothermund K (2011) Affective matching moderates S–R binding. Cogn Emot 25:342–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG (1970) A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. J Exp Psychol 86:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harleß E (1861) Der Apparat des Willens [The Apparatus of Will]. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 38:50–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbart JF (1825) Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik [Psychology as a science newly founded on experience, metaphysics, and mathematics]. August Wilhelm Unzer, Königsberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbort O, Butz MV (2012) Too good to be true? Ideomotor theory from a computational perspective. Frontiers Psychol 3:494. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwig A, Horstmann G (2011) Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements. Psychon Bull Rev 18:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herwig A, Waszak F (2012) Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers Psychol 3:444. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwig A, Prinz W, Waszak F (2007) Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Q J Exp Psychol 60:1540–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann J (1993) Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung [Prediction and Realisation: The function of anticipations in human behavioural control and perception]. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann J, Lenhard A, Sebald A, Pfister R (2009) Movements or targets: what makes an action in action effect learning? Q J Exp Psychol 62:2433–2449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (1993) Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychol Res 55:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B (2009) Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychol Res 73:512–526

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard J, Gazzaley A, Morsella E (2011) Traditional response interference effects from anticipated action outcomes: a response–effect compatibility paradigm. Acta Psychol 138:106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890/1981) The principles of psychology, vol 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Janczyk M, Skirde S, Weigelt M, Kunde W (2009) Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance. Hum Mov Sci 28:437–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk M, Pfister R, Crognale MA, Kunde W (2012a) Effective rotations: action-effects determine the interplay of mental and manual rotations. J Exp Psychol Gen 141:489–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk M, Pfister R, Kunde W (2012b) On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. J Psychol 220:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Janczyk M, Heinemann A, Pfister R (2012c) Instant attraction: immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulus- and goal-driven actions. Frontiers Psychol 3:446. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller PE, Koch I (2006) Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Adv Cogn Psychol 2:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch I, Kunde W (2002) Verbal response–effect compatibility. Mem Cogn 30:1297–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieghoff V, Brass M, Prinz W, Waszak F (2009) Dissociating what and when of intentional actions. Frontiers Hum Neurosci 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn S, Elsner B, Prinz W, Brass M (2009) Busy doing nothing: evidence for nonaction-effect binding. Psychon Bull Rev 16:542–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde W (2001) Response–effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum 27:387–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde W (2003) Temporal response–effect compatibility. Psychol Res 67:153–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde W, Koch I, Hoffmann J (2004) Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. Q J Exp Psychol 57:87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde W, Lozo L, Neumann R (2011) Effect-based control of facial expressions. Evidence from action-effect compatibility. Psychon Bull Rev 18:820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde W, Pfister R, Janczyk M (2012) The locus of tool-transformation costs. J Exp Psychol Hum 38:703–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig S, Sutter C, Müsseler J (2012) Crosstalk between proximal and distal action effects during tool use. J Psychol 220:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotze HR (1852) Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele [Medical psychology or the physiology of the mind]. Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller B, Frings C (2011) Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets. Exp Brain Res 72:2176–2183

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattkemper D, Ziessler M, Frensch PA (2010) Binding in voluntary action control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34:1092–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oriet C, Stevanovski B, Jolicoeur P (2001) Theory of event coding: interesting, but underspecified. Behav Brain Sci 24:897–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Janczyk M (2012) Harleß’ apparatus of will: 150 years later. Psychol Res 76:561–565

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Janczyk M (2013) Confidence intervals for two sample means: calculation, interpretation, and a few simple rules. Adv Cogn Psychol 9:74–80

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Kunde W (2013) Dissecting the response in response–effect compatibility. Exp Brain Res 224:647–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Kiesel A, Melcher T (2010) Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychol 135:316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Kiesel A, Hoffmann J (2011) Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychol Res 75:61–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Schwarz KA, Janczyk M (2012) Ubi irritatio, ibi affluxus: a 19th century perspective on haemodynamic brain activity. Cortex 48:1061–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister R, Dignath D, Hommel B, Kunde W (2013) It takes two to imitate: anticipation and imitation in social interaction. Psychol Sci 24(10):2117–2121

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1990) A common coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1992) Why don’t we perceive our brain states? Eur J Cogn Psychol 4:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger M (2007) Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing. Acta Psychol 126:138–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruge H, Krebs RM, Wolfensteller U (2012) Early markers of ongoing action-effect learning. Frontiers Psychol 3:522. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders AF (2001) How specific and common is common coding? Behav Brain Sci 24:903–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin YK, Proctor RW (2012) Testing boundary conditions of the ideomotor hypothesis using a delayed response task. Acta Psychol 141:360–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin YK, Proctor RW, Capaldi EJ (2010) A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychol Bull 136:943–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stock A, Stock C (2004) A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychol Res 68:176–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1913) Ideo-motor action. Psychol Rev 20:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensteller U, Ruge H (2011) On the timescale of stimulus-based action-effect learning. Q J Exp Psychol 64:1273–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; DFG) to Wilfried Kunde (Ku 1964/2-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology III, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany

    Roland Pfister, Markus Janczyk, Marcel Gressmann & Wilfried Kunde

  2. Psychology Department, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA

    Lisa R. Fournier

Authors
  1. Roland Pfister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Janczyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcel Gressmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lisa R. Fournier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wilfried Kunde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Pfister.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Gressmann, M. et al. Good vibrations? Vibrotactile self-stimulation reveals anticipation of body-related action effects in motor control. Exp Brain Res 232, 847–854 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3796-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3796-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation