Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 231, Issue 4, pp 495–500 | Cite as

Spontaneous EEG fluctuations determine the readiness potential: is preconscious brain activation a preparation process to move?

  • Han-Gue Jo
  • Thilo Hinterberger
  • Marc Wittmann
  • Tilmann Lhündrup Borghardt
  • Stefan Schmidt
Research Article

Abstract

It has been repeatedly shown that specific brain activity related to planning movement develops before the conscious intention to act. This empirical finding strongly challenges the notion of free will. Here, we demonstrate that in the Libet experiment, spontaneous fluctuations of the slow electro-cortical potentials (SCPs) account for a significant fraction of the readiness potential (RP). The individual potential shifts preceding self-initiated movements were classified as showing a negative or positive shift. The negative and positive potential shifts were analyzed in a self-initiated movement condition and in a no-movement condition. Comparing the potential shifts between both conditions, we observed no differences in the early part of the potential. This reveals that the apparently negative RP emerges through an unequal ratio of negative and positive potential shifts. These results suggest that ongoing negative shifts of the SCPs facilitate self-initiated movement but are not related to processes underlying preparation or decision to act.

Keywords

Free will Intention to move Libet experiment Slow cortical potential Readiness potential 

Supplementary material

221_2013_3713_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (142 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 142 kb)

References

  1. Bennett MR, Hacker PMS (2003) Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar
  2. Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Canavan AGM, Rockstroh B (1990) Slow potential of the cerebral cortex and behavior. Physiol Rev 70(1):1–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):9–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guggisberg AG, Mottat AM (2013) Timing and awareness of movement decisions: does consciousness really come too late? Front Hum Neurosci 7:385. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00385 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haggard P (2008) Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(12):934–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haggard P, Eimer M (1999) On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 126(1):128–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herrmann CS, Pauen M, Min BK, Busch NA, Rieger JW (2008) Analysis of a choice-reaction task yields a new interpretation of Libet’s experiment. Int J Psychophysiol 67:151–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keller I, Heckhausen H (1990) Readiness potentials preceding spontaneous motor acts: voluntary vs. involuntary control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:351–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kornhuber HH, Deecke L (1965) Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflügers Archive 284(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kotchoubey B (2012) Why are you free? Neurobiology and psychology of voluntary action. Nova Sci Pub, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Libet B (1985) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behav Brain Sci 8(4):529–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106(3):623–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCallum WC, Curry SH (1993) Slow potential changes in the human brain. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller J, Shepherdson P, Trevena J (2011) Effects of clock monitoring on electroencephalographic activity: is unconscious movement intention an artifact of the clock? Psychol Sci 22(1):103–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitzdorf U (1985) Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol Rev 65(1):37–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rigoni D, Kühn S, Sartori G, Brass M (2011) Inducing disbelief in free will alters brain correlates of preconscious motor preparation: the brain minds whether we believe in free will or not. Psychol Sci 22(5):613–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schlegel A, Alexander P, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Roskies A, Tse PT, Wheatley T (2013) Braking up the wrong free: readiness potentials reflect processes independent of conscious will. Exp Brain Res 229(3):329–335Google Scholar
  18. Schurger A, Sitt JD, Dehaene S (2012) An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(42):E2904–E2913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shibasaki H, Hallet M (2006) What is the bereitschaftspotential? Clin Neurophysiol 117(11):2341–2356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sirigui A, Daprati E, Ciancia S, Giraux P, Nighoghossian N, Posada A, Haggard P (2004) Altered awareness of voluntary action after damage to the parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 7(1):80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Trevena J, Miller J (2010) Brain preparation before a voluntary action: evidence against unconscious movement initiation. Conscious Cogn 19:447–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. VaezMousavi SM, Barry RJ (1993) Positive and negative shifts of the readiness potential: preparatory effects. Int J Psychophysiol 15(2):105–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Han-Gue Jo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Thilo Hinterberger
    • 3
  • Marc Wittmann
    • 4
  • Tilmann Lhündrup Borghardt
    • 1
  • Stefan Schmidt
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychosomatic MedicineUniversity Medical Center FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Transcultural Health StudiesEuropean University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder)Germany
  3. 3.Research Section of Applied Consciousness Sciences, Department of Psychosomatic MedicineUniversity Medical Center RegensburgRegensburgGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental HealthFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations