Almeida J, Mahon BZ, Nakayama K, Caramazza A (2008) Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:15214–15218. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805867105
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Almeida J, Mahon BZ, Caramazza A (2010) The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychol Sci 21:772–778. doi:10.1177/0956797610371343
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Anderson SJ, Yamagishi N, Karavia V (2002) Attentional process link perception and action. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1225–1232. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1998
Article
Google Scholar
Boronat CB, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB, Tang K, Saffran EM, Kimberg DY, Detre JA (2005) Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cogn Brain Res 23:361–373. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.001
Article
Google Scholar
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buxbaum LJ (2001) Ideomotor aparxia: a call to action. Neurocase 7:445–458. doi:10.1093/neucas/7.6.445
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Buxbaum LJ, Saffran EM (2002) Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and non-apraxic subjects. Brain Lang 89:179–199. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00014-7
Article
Google Scholar
Chao LL, Martin A (2000) Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12:478–484. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0635
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Constantini M, Ambrosini E, Tieri G, Sinigaglia C, Committeri G (2010) Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Exp Brain Res 207:95–103. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2435-8
Article
Google Scholar
Ellis R, Tucker M (2000) Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol 91:451–471. doi:10.1348/000712600161934
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston. doi:10.2307/989638
Google Scholar
Goldenberg G (2009) Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 47:1449–1459. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.014
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Grèzes J, Decety J (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 40:212–222. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00089-6
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Harris IM, Murray AM, Hayward WG, O’Callaghan C, Andrews S (in press) Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representation of manipulable and non-manipulable objects. J Exp Psychol Human
Helbig HB, Graf M, Kiefer M (2006) The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 174:221–228. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0443-5
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Helbig HB, Steinwender J, Graf M, Kiefer M (2010) Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Exp Brain Res 200:251–258. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1953-8
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kellenbach ML, Brett M, Patterson K (2003) Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. J Cogn Neurosci 15(1):30–46. doi:10.1162/089892903321107800
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D (2007) What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36 ECVP Abstract Supplement
Kroliczak G, Frey SH (2009) A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. Cereb Cortex 19(10):2396–2410. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn261
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Negri GA, Lunardelli A, Reverberi C, Gigli GL, Rumiati RI (2007) Degraded semantic knowledge and accurate object use. Cortex 43:376–388. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70463-5
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Noppeney U (2009) The neural systems of tool and action semantics: a perspective from functional imaging. J Physiol Paris 102:40–49. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.009
Article
Google Scholar
Osiruak F, Aubin G, Allain P, Jarry C, Richard I, Le Gall D (2008) Object utilization and object usage: a single-case study. Neurocase 14(2):169–183. doi:10.1080/13554790802108372
Article
Google Scholar
Osiurak F, Aubin G, Allain P, Jarry C, Etcharry-Bouyx F, Richard I, Le Gall D (2008) Different constraints on grip selection in brain-damaged patients: object use versus object transport. Neuropsychologia 46:2431–2434. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.018
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Osiurak F, Jarry C, Le Gall D (2010) Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychol Rev 117(2):517–540. doi:10.1037/a0019004
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Osiurak F, Jarry C, Le Gall D (2011) Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis. New perspectives on apraxia of tool use. Neuropsychologia 49:299–312. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.041
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Pappas Z, Mack A (2008) Potentiation of action by undetected affordant objects. Vis cogn 16(7):892–915. doi:10.1080/13506280701542185
Article
Google Scholar
Pelli DG (1997) The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Randerath J, Li Y, Goldenberg G, Hermsdörfer J (2009) Grasping tools: effects of task and apraxia. Neuropsychologia 47:497–505. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.005
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
Tucker M, Ellis R (2004) Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychol 116:185–203. doi:10.1007/s00221-009-1953-8
Article
Google Scholar
Vainio L, Ellis R, Tucker M, Symes E (2006) Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping. Exp Brain Res 175:395–406. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0378-x
Article
Google Scholar
Vingerhoets G, Vandamme K, Vercammen A (2009) Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances. Brain Cogn 69:481–489. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.003
PubMed
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Vingerhoets G, Vandekerckhove E, Honore P, Vandemaele P, Achten E (2011) Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving? Hum Brain Mapp 32(6):905–918. doi:10.1002/hbm.21078
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar