Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 217, Issue 1, pp 153–162 | Cite as

The transition from implicit to explicit representations in incidental learning situations: more evidence from high-frequency EEG coupling

  • Jan R. WesselEmail author
  • Hilde Haider
  • Michael Rose
Research Article

Abstract

Implicit learning, i.e. knowledge acquisition in incidental learning situations, is a fundamental feature of the human mind. The extraction of (and subsequent adaptation to) regular patterns in the environment facilitates everyday actions. The cognitive and neural processes accompanying the transition from subconscious (implicit) to verbally reportable (explicit) knowledge about task contingencies are of high interest to the cognitive neurosciences, since they indicate a process that generates awareness for learned associations. Previous studies indicated an important role of high-frequency coupling (gamma-band) for the process that initiates the emergence of awareness for an implicitly learned task-underlying structure. It is unclear, however, whether this EEG coupling is indicative of a general, task-independent process accompanying the shift between implicit and explicit knowledge. To test the general role of this synchrony effect, we investigated EEG gamma-band coherence in the time period where this transition takes place using a serial reaction time paradigm. As expected, we find increased coupling in the gamma-band EEG between right prefrontal and occipital electrode sites just before the behavioural manifestation of emerging explicit sequence representation. These results support both the notion of general involvement of widespread cortical associative couplings in the generation of conscious knowledge and the necessity to study emerging consciously available memory representations using fine-grained properties of behavioural data.

Keywords

Electroencephalography Coherence Implicit learning Consciousness 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barbati G, Porcaro C, Hadjipapas A, Adjamian P, Pizzella V, Romani GL, Seri S, Tecchio F, Barnes GR (2008) Functional source separation applied to induced visual gamma activity. Hum Brain Mapp 29(2):131–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carter RM, O’Doherty JP, Seymour B, Koch C, Dolan RJ (2006) Contingency awareness in human aversive conditioning involves the middle frontal gyrus. Neuroimage 29(3):1007–1012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cleeremans A, Jiménez L (2002) Implicit learning and consciousness: a graded dynamic perspective. In: French RM, Cleeremans A (eds) Implicit learning and consciousness: an empirical philosophical and computational consensus in the making. Psychology Press, London, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  4. Crick F, Koch C (2003) A framework for consciousness. Nat Neurosci 6(2):119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Debener S, Ullsperger M, Siegel M, Engel AK (2007) Towards single-trial analysis in cognitive brain research. Trends Cogn Sci 11(12):502–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dehaene S, Naccache L (2001) Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 79(1–2):1–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):9–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delorme A, Sejnowski T, Makeig S (2007) Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage 34(4):1443–1449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dienes Z (2008) Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Prog Brain Res 168:49–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dienes Z, Scott R (2005) Measuring unconscious knowledge: distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychol Res 69(5–6):338–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eimer M, Goschke T, Schlaghecken F, Sturmer B (1996) Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(4):970–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engel AK, Fries P, Singer W (2001) Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2(10):704–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frensch PA, Haider H, Runger D, Neugebauer U, Voigt S, Werg J (2002) The route from implicit learning to verbal expression of what has been learned. In: Jimenez L (ed) Attention and implicit learning. John Benjamin Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 335–366Google Scholar
  14. Haider H, Frensch PA (2005) The generation of conscious awareness in an incidental learning situation. Psychol Res 69(5–6):399–411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haider H, Frensch PA (2009) Conflicts between expected and actually performed behavior lead to verbal report of incidentally acquired sequential knowledge. Psychol Res 73(6):817–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haider H, Rose M (2007) How to investigate insight: a proposal. Methods 42(1):49–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haider H, Eichler A, Lange T (2010) An old problem: how can we distinguish between conscious and unconscious knowledge acquired in an implicit learning task? Conscious Cogn 20(3):658–672PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarvis MR, Mitra PP (2001) Sampling properties of the spectrum and coherency of sequences of action potentials. Neural Comput 13(4):717–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jung-Beeman M, Bowden EM, Haberman J, Frymiare JL, Arambel-Liu S, Greenblatt R et al (2004) Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biol 2(4):E97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jutten C, Herault J (1991) Blind separation of sources 1: an adaptive algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture. Signal Proc 24(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee TW, Girolami M, Sejnowski TJ (1999) Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources. Neural Comput 11(2):417–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lisman J (2005) The theta/gamma discrete phase code occurring during the hippocampal phase precession may be a more general brain coding scheme. Hippocampus 15(7):913–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Makeig S, Debener S, Onton J, Delorme A (2004) Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn Sci 8(5):204–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McIntosh AR, Rajah MN, Lobaugh NJ (1999) Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning. Science 284(5419):1531–1533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nissen MJ, Bullemer PT (1987) Attentional requirements for learning: evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol 19:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Persaud N, McLeod P, Cowey A (2007) Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nat Neurosci 10(2):257–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porcaro C, Ostwald D, Bagshaw AP (2010) Functional source separation improves the quality of single trial visual evoked potentials recorded during concurrent EEG-fMRI. Neuroimage 50(1):112–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quian Quiroga R, Garcia H (2003) Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising. Clin Neurophysiol 114(2):376–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reber AS (1967) Implicit learning of artificial grammars. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 6(6):855–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rose M, Haider H, Buchel C (2005) Unconscious detection of implicit expectancies. J Cogn Neurosci 17(6):918–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose M, Haider H, Buchel C (2010) The emergence of explicit memory during learning. Cereb Cortex 20(12):2787–2797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Runger D, Frensch PA (2008) How incidental sequence learning creates reportable knowledge: the role of unexpected events. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34(5):1011–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Russeler J, Henninghausen E, Munte TF, Rosler F (2003) Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Cogn Brain Res 15(2):116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schlaghecken F, Sturmer B, Eimer M (2000) Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: electrophysiological indicators. Mem Cognit 28(5):821–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seger CA (1994) Implicit learning. Psychol Bull 115(2):163–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strange BA, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Dolan RJ (2001) Anterior prefrontal cortex mediates rule learning in humans. Cereb Cortex 11(11):1040–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Willingham DB, Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1989) On the development of procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15(6):1047–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.NeuroImage Nord, Department of Systems NeuroscienceUniversity Medical Center of Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations