Trans-saccadic processing of visual and motor planning during sequential eye movements
How the brain maintains perceptual continuity across eye movements that yield discontinuous snapshots of the world is still poorly understood. In this study, we adapted a framework from the dual-task paradigm, well suited to reveal bottlenecks in mental processing, to study how information is processed across sequential saccades. The pattern of RTs allowed us to distinguish among three forms of trans-saccadic processing (no trans-saccadic processing, trans-saccadic visual processing and trans-saccadic visual processing and saccade planning models). Using a cued double-step saccade task, we show that even though saccade execution is a processing bottleneck, limiting access to incoming visual information, partial visual and motor processing that occur prior to saccade execution is used to guide the next eye movement. These results provide insights into how the oculomotor system is designed to process information across multiple fixations that occur during natural scanning.
KeywordsConcurrent processing Eye movements Attention Saccadic suppression
This work was supported by grants from the Department of Science & Technology and the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India. S. Ray was supported by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India. We thank Dr. A. Sripati, Dr. S.J. Heinen and A. Ramakrishnan for their critical comments on the manuscript.
- Becker W (1993) in Contemporary ocular motor and vestibular research: a tribute to David A Robinson. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 496–503Google Scholar
- Bonnet C, Dresp B (2001) RT studies of sensory magnitude and perceptual processing. Psychologica 28:63–86Google Scholar
- Hayhoe MM, Lachter J, Moeller P (1992) In: Rayner K (ed) Eye movements and visual cognition: scene perception and reading. Springer, New York, pp 130–145Google Scholar
- Holt EB (1903) Eye movements and central anesthesia. Psychol Rev 4:3–45Google Scholar
- Mackay DM (1970) Mislocation of test flashes during saccadic image displacements. Nature 227:731–733Google Scholar
- Sperling G (1990) Comparion of perception in the moving and stationary eye. In: Kowler E (ed) Eye movements their role in visual, cognitive processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 307–351Google Scholar
- Welford AT (1952) The ‘psychological refractory period’ and the timing of high-speed performance: a review and a theory. Br J Psychol 43:2–19Google Scholar