Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, 214:105 | Cite as

Distance modulated neuronal activity in the cortical visual areas of cats

  • I. N. Pigarev
  • E. V. Levichkina
Research Article

Abstract

During previous studies in cats and monkeys, it was found that in some neurons, responses to visual stimuli of the same angular size were dependent on the absolute distance to these stimuli. To study how widely this peculiarity of visual responses is distributed among cortical visual areas, we recorded activity of neurons in areas V4A, V2, V1, and frontal visual area on the lower bank of the cruciate sulcus. Neuronal activity was recorded at near (20 cm) or far (3 m) distances from a 3D stationary visual scene. Visual scenes were vertically corrugated light gray screens. Angular dimensions of the screens were the same at short and far distances. Eye movements were free during the test procedure. It was found that about 20% of neurons in areas V4A, V1, and frontal visual area had significantly different levels of activity, while animals were looking at the visual scenes located near or far from the eyes. No neurons with depth modulated activity were found in area V2.

Keywords

Depth selectivity 3D Cortex Area V4A Area V2 Area V1 Frontal visual area Cat Receptive fields 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are obliged to Dr. Denys Garden for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by The Russian Foundation for Basic Researches Grant 10-04-00844 and by the Research program of the Division of the biological sciences RAS.

References

  1. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (2001) Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect. Nat Neurosci 4:513–518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dobbins AC, Richard MJ, Fiser J, Allman JM (1998) Distance modulation of neural activity in the visual cortex. Science 281:552–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gurewitsch M, Chatschaturian A (1928) Zur Cytoarchitektonik der Grosshirnrinde der Feliden. Z Anat Entw Gesch 87:100–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ichikawa M, Saida S, Osa A, Munechika K (2003) Integration of binocular disparity and monocular cues at near threshold level. Vision Res 43:2439–2449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Levichkina EV, Loshkarev AA, Rodionova EI, Popova EP, Pigarev IN (2007) Whether radial receptive field organization of the fourth extrastriate crescent (area V4A) gives special advantage for analysis of the optic flow. Comparison with the first crescent (area V2). Exp Brain Res 182:215–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nadler JW, Angelaki DE, DeAngelis GC (2008) A neural representation of depth from motion parallax in macaque visual cortex. Nature 3:642–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nawrot M (2003) Eye movements provide the extra-retinal signal required for the perception of depth from motion parallax. Vision Res 43:1553–1562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Noda H, Freeman RB, Gies B, Creutzfeldt OD (1971) Neural responses in the visual cortex of awake cats to stationary and moving targets. Exp Brain Res 12:389–405Google Scholar
  9. Pigarev IN (1984) New visual area on the lower bank of cat’s cruciate sulcus. Neurophysiologia (Kiev) 16:766–773Google Scholar
  10. Pigarev IN, Rodionova EI (1998) Two visual areas located in the middle suprasylvian gyrus (cytoarchitectonic field 7) of the cat’s cortex. Neuroscience 85:717–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pigarev IN, Nothdurft HC, Kastner S (2002) Neurons with radial receptive fields in monkey area V4A: evidence of a subdivision of prelunate gyrus based on neuronal response properties. Exp Brain Res 145:199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pigarev IN, Saalmann YB, Vidyasagar TR (2009) A minimally invasive and reversible system for chronic recordings from multiple brain sites in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci Methods 181:151–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reinoso-Suárez F (1961) Topographischer Hirnatlas der Katze für experimental-physiologische Untersuchungen. Merck, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodionova EI, Revishchin AV, Pigarev IN (2004) Distant cortical locations of the upper and lower quadrants of the visual field represented by neurons with elongated and radially oriented receptive fields. Exp Brain Res 158:373–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rosenbluth D, Allman JM (2002) The effect of gaze angle and fixation distance on the responses of neurons in V1, V2, and V4. Neuron 33:143–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sakata H, Tsutsui KI, Taira M (2005) Toward an understanding of the neural processing for 3D shape perception. Neuropsychologia 43:151–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schiller PH, Slocum WM, Weiner VS (2007) How the parallel channels of the retina contribute to depth processing. Eur J Neurosci 26:1307–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sheliga BM, Prokofiev SK, Shulgovski VV, Moscvitin AA (1987) Simple method of search coil implantation into the cat’s eye. Physiol J USSR 173:133–134Google Scholar
  19. Tsutsui K, Sakata H, Naganuma T, Taira M (2002) Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science 298:376–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Westheimer G (2009) The third dimension in the primary visual cortex. J Physiol 587:2807–2816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zimmermann M (1987) Ethical principles for maintenance and use of animals in neuroscience research. Neurosci Lett 73:1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Information Transmission Problems (Kharkevich Institute)Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations