Skip to main content
Log in

It is all me: the effect of viewpoint on visual–vestibular recalibration

Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participants performed a visual–vestibular motor recalibration task in virtual reality. The task consisted of keeping the extended arm and hand stable in space during a whole-body rotation induced by a robotic wheelchair. Performance was first quantified in a pre-test in which no visual feedback was available during the rotation. During the subsequent adaptation phase, optical flow resulting from body rotation was provided. This visual feedback was manipulated to create the illusion of a smaller rotational movement than actually occurred, hereby altering the visual–vestibular mapping. The effects of the adaptation phase on hand stabilization performance were measured during a post-test that was identical to the pre-test. Three different groups of subjects were exposed to different perspectives on the visual scene, i.e., first-person, top view, or mirror view. Sensorimotor adaptation occurred for all three viewpoint conditions, performance in the post-test session showing a marked under-compensation relative to the pre-test performance. In other words, all viewpoints gave rise to a remapping between vestibular input and the motor output required to stabilize the arm. Furthermore, the first-person and mirror view adaptation induced a significant decrease in variability of the stabilization performance. Such variability reduction was not observed for the top view adaptation. These results suggest that even if all three viewpoints can evoke substantial adaptation aftereffects, the more naturalistic first-person view and the richer mirror view should be preferred when reducing motor variability constitutes an important issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  • Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS (2009) Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation 25:29–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong TR (1970) Feedback and perceptual-motor skill learning: a review of information feedback and manual guidance training techniques. Technical Report No. 25, Human Performance Center, University of Michigan

  • Blouin J, Guillaud E, Bresciani JP, Guerraz M, Simoneau M (2010) Insights into the control of arm movement during body motion as revealed by EMG analyses. Brain Res 1309:40–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani JP, Blouin J, Sarlegna F, Bourdin C, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM (2002) On-line versus off-line vestibular-evoked control of goal-directed arm movements. NeuroReport 13:1563–1566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani JP, Gauthier GM, Vercher J, Blouin J (2005) On the nature of the vestibular control of arm-reaching movements during whole-body rotations. Exp Brain Res 164:431–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan M (2001) Embodiment, perception, and virtual reality. LNAI 2117:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creem-Regehr SH, Willemsen P, Gooch AA, Thompson WB (2005) The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception 34:191–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaud E, Simoneau M, Gauthier GM, Blouin J (2006) Controlling reaching movements during self-motion: body-fixed versus Earth-fixed targets. Mot Control 10:330–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LR, Jenkin M, Zikovitz DC (2000) Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self-motion. Exp Brain Res 135:12–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay JC, Pick HLJ (1966) Gaze-contingent prism adaptation: optical and motor factors. J Exp Psychol 72:640–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M (2007) Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 14:52–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Israël I, Chapuis N, Glasauer S, Charade O, Berthoz A (1993) Estimation of passive horizontal linear whole-body displacement in humans. J Neurophysiol 70:1270–1273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Israël I, Sievering D, Koenig E (1995) Self-rotation estimate about the vertical axis. Acta Otolaryngol 115:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanenko Y, Grasso R, Israël I, Berthoz A (1997) Spatial orientation in humans: perception of angular whole-body displacements in two-dimensional trajectories. Exp Brain Res 117:419–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jürgens R, Nasios G, Becker W (2003) Vestibular, optokinetic, and cognitive contribution to the guidance of passive self-rotation toward instructed targets. Exp Brain Res 151:90–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kammers MPM, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC (2009) The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 47:204–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Körding KP, Wolpert DM (2004) The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9839–9842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC (1999) Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 354:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJH (2003) Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 34:2181–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Knapp JM (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Hettinger LJ, Haas MW (eds) Virtual and adaptive environments. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JM, Blascovich JJ, Beall AC (1999) Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 31:557–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo JA, Kaber DB, Endsley MR, Powanusorn P, Myung S (1998) The effect of automated compensation for incongruent axes on teleoperator performance. Hum Factors 40:541–553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahncke HW, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM (2006) Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog Brain Res 157:81–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, Armani M (2007) Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:142–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen TS (1990) Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 21:247–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Platz T, Eickhof C, van Kaick S, Engel U, Pinkowski C et al (2005) Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 19:714–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proteau L, Marteniuk RG, Levesque L (1992) A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: evidence indicating specificity of practice. Q J Exp Psychol A 44:557–575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redding GM, Rossetti Y, Wallace B (2005) Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:431–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ring H, Rosenthal N (2005) Controlled study of neuroprosthetic functional electrical stimulation in sub-acute post-stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 37:32–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salamin P, Thalmann D (2010) Providing the best third-person perspective to a video-through HMD. VRLAB-CONF-2010-003

  • Salamin P, Thalmann D, Vexo F (2006) Benefits of a third-person perspective in virtual and augmented reality. Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. ACM, New-York, pp 27–30

  • Schubert T, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht H (2001) The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence 10:266–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siekierka EM, Eng K, Bassetti C, Blickenstorfer A, Cameirao MS et al (2007) New technologies and concepts for rehabilitation in the acute phase of stroke: a collaborative matrix. Neurodegener Dis 4:57–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Summers JJ, Kagerer FA, Garry MI, Hiraga CY, Loftus A et al (2007) Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a TMS study. J Neurol Sci 252:76–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarr MJ, Warren WH (2002) Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond. Nat Neurosci 5(Suppl):1089–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1997) Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J Mot Behav 29:147–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay L (2010) Vision and goal-directed movement: neurobehavioral perspectives. In: Elliott D, Khan M (eds) Vision and movement: control of directed action. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 281–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay L, Proteau L (1998) Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. Res Q Exerc Sport 69:284–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ustinova KI, Perkins J, Szostakowski L, Tamkei LS, Leonard WA (2010) Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment: potential for virtual rehabilitation. Acta Psychol (Amst) 133:180–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welch RB, Widawski MH, Harrington J, Warren DH (1979) An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation. Percept Psychophys 25:126–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7:225–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Max Planck Society and also by WCU (World Class University) program funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology through the National Research Foundation of Korea (R31-10008). The authors thank Heike Bischoff, Michael Kerger, and Betty Mohler for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Heinrich H. Bülthoff or Jean-Pierre Bresciani.

Appendix

Appendix

Avatar Embodiment Questionnaire

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schomaker, J., Tesch, J., Bülthoff, H.H. et al. It is all me: the effect of viewpoint on visual–vestibular recalibration. Exp Brain Res 213, 245–256 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2723-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2723-y

Keywords

Navigation