Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-finger interaction during involuntary and voluntary single finger force changes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two types of finger interaction are characterized by positive co-variation (enslaving) or negative co-variation (error compensation) of finger forces. Enslaving reflects mechanical and neural connections among fingers, while error compensation results from synergic control of fingers to stabilize their net output. Involuntary and voluntary force changes by a finger were used to explore these patterns. We hypothesized that synergic mechanisms will dominate during involuntary force changes, while enslaving will dominate during voluntary finger force changes. Subjects pressed with all four fingers to match a target force that was 10% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). One of the fingers was unexpectedly raised 5.0 mm at a speed of 30.0 mm/s. During finger raising the subject was instructed “not to intervene voluntarily”. After the finger was passively lifted and a new steady-state achieved, subjects pressed down with the lifted finger, producing a pulse of force voluntarily. The data were analyzed in terms of finger forces and finger modes (hypothetical commands to fingers reflecting their intended involvement). The target finger showed an increase in force during both phases. In the involuntary phase, the target finger force changes ranged between 10.71 ± 1.89% MVC (I-finger) and 16.60 ± 2.26% MVC (L-finger). Generally, non-target fingers displayed a force decrease with a maximum amplitude of −1.49 ± 0.43% MVC (L-finger). Thus, during the involuntary phase, error compensation was observed—non-lifted fingers showed a decrease in force (as well as in mode magnitude). During the voluntary phase, enslaving was observed—non-target fingers showed an increase in force and only minor changes in mode magnitude. The average change in force of non-target fingers ranged from 21.83 ± 4.47% MVC for R-finger (M-finger task) to 0.71 ± 1.10% MVC for L-finger (I-finger task). The average change in mode of non-target fingers was between −7.34 ± 19.27% MVC for R-finger (L-finger task) and 7.10 ± 1.38% MVC for M-finger (I-finger task). We discuss a range of factors affecting force changes, from purely mechanical effects of finger passive lifting to neural synergic adjustments of commands to individual fingers. The data fit a recently suggested scheme that merges the equilibrium-point hypothesis (control with referent configurations) with the idea of hierarchical synergic control of multi-element systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbib MA, Iberall T, Lyons D (1985) Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand. In: Goodwin AW, Darian-Smith I (eds) Hand function and the neocortex. Berlin, Springer Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin M, Kaiser E, Milz S (2008) Structure-function relationships in tendons: a review. J Anatomy 212:211–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler TJ, Kilbreath SL, Gorman RB, Gandevia SC (2005). Selective recruitment of single motor units in human flexor digitorum superficialis muscle during flexion of individual fingers. J Physiol 564:301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Danion F, Schoner G, Latash ML, Li S, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks. Biol Cybern 88:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrer M (1981) Interdependent and independent actions of the fingers. In: Tubiana R (ed) The hand. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG (1966) Functional tuning of the nervous system with control of movement or maintenance of a steady posture. II. Controllable parameters of the muscle. Biophysics 11:565–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG (1986) Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (λ-model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18:17–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman AG, Levin MF (1995) Positional frames of reference in motor control: their origin and use. Behav Brain Sci 18:723–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand IM, Latash ML (1998) On the problem of adequate language in motor control. Mot Control 2:306–313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak S, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2007) Hierarchies of synergies: an example of the two-hand, multi-finger tasks. Exp Brain Res 179:167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keen DA, Fuglevand AJ (2004) Distribution of motor unit force in human extensor digitorum assessed by spike-triggered averaging and intraneural microstimulation. J Neurophysiol 91:2515–2523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbreath SL, Gandevia SC (1994) Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects. J Physiol 479:487–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klous M, Danna-dos-Santos A, Latash ML (2010) Multi-muscle synergies in a dual postural task: evidence for the principle of superposition. Exp Brain Res 202:457–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2008) Synergy. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2010a) Motor control: in search of physics of the living systems. J Hum Kinet 24:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML (2010b) Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis. Mot Control 14:294–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Li ZM, Zatsiorsky VM (1998) A principle of error compensation studied within a task of force production by a redundant set of fingers. Exp Brain Res 122:131–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schoner G (2001) Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 141:153–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2002) Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Mot Control 11:276–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Latash ML, Friedman J, Kim SW, Feldman AG, Zatsiorsky VM (2010) Prehension synergies and control with referent hand configurations. Exp Brain Res 202:213–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leijnse JNAL (1997) Measuring force transfers in the deep flexors of the musician’s hand: theoretical analysis, clinical examples. J Biomech 30:873–882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZM, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (1998) Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem. Exp Brain Res 119:276–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2003) Finger interaction during multi-finger tasks involving finger addition and removal. Exp Brain Res 150:230–236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liddell EGT, Sherrington CS (1924) Reflexes in response to stretch (myotatic reflexes). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 96:212–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson SP (1998) Passive properties of human skeletal muscle during stretch maneuvers. A review. Scand J Med Sci Sport 8:65–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JR, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2009) Interaction of finger enslaving and error compensation in multiple finger force production. Exp Brain Res 192:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JR, Budgeon MK, Latash ML, Zatsiorsky VM (2010) Stabilization of the total force in multi-finger pressing tasks studied with the ‘inverse piano’ technique. Hum Move Sci (in press)

  • Matthews PBC (1959) The dependence of tension upon extension in the stretch reflex of the soleus of the decerebrate cat. J Physiol 47:521–546

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty PA, Cresswell AG (2004) Recruitment of single human low-threshold motor units with increasing loads at different muscle lengths. J Electromyography Kinesiol 14:369–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rack PMH, Westbury DR (1969) The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol 204:443–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rathelot JA, Strick PL (2006) Muscle representation in the macaque motor cortex: an anatomical perspective. PNAS 103:8257–8262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanes JN, Donoghue JP, Thangaraj V, Edelman RR, Warach S (1995) Shared neural substrates controlling hand movements in human motor cortex. Science 268:1775–1777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schieber MH (1995) Muscular production of individuated finger movements: the roles of extrinsic finger muscles. J Neuroscience 15:284–297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schieber MH, Hibbard LS (1993) How somatotopic is the motor cortex hand area. Science 261:489–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz JP, Danion F, Latash ML, Schoner G (2002) Understanding finger coordination through analysis of the structure of force variability. Biol Cybern 86:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapkova EY, Shapkova AL, Goodman SR, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) Do synergies decrease force variability? A study of single-finger and multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 188:411–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK, Park J, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2006) Adjustments of prehension synergies in response to self-triggered and experimenter-triggered load and torque perturbations. Exp Brain Res 175:641–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vigouroux L, Ferry M, Colloud F, Paclet F, Cahouet V, Quaine F (2008) Is the principle of minimization of secondary moments validated during various fingertip force production conditions? Hum Mov Sci 27:396–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (1998) Coordinated force production in multi-finger tasks: finger interaction and neural network modeling. Biol Cybern 79:139–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Li ZM, Latash ML (2000) Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production. Exp Brain Res 131:187–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Gregory RW, Latash ML (2002) Force and torque production in static multifinger prehension: biomechanics and control. II. Control. Biol Cybern 87:40–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2008) What do synergies do? Effects of secondary constraints on multi-digit synergies in accurate force-production tasks. J Neurophys 99:500–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was in part supported by NIH grants AG-018751, NS-035032, and AR-048563.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA

    J. R. Martin, V. M. Zatsiorsky & M. L. Latash

Authors
  1. J. R. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. M. Zatsiorsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. L. Latash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, J.R., Zatsiorsky, V.M. & Latash, M.L. Multi-finger interaction during involuntary and voluntary single finger force changes. Exp Brain Res 208, 423–435 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2492-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2492-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation