Abstract
Previous work from our laboratory indicates that interhemispheric interaction (IHI) functionally increases the attentional capacity available to support performance on visual tasks (Banich in The asymmetrical brain, pp 261–302, 2003). Because manipulations of both computational complexity and selection demand alter the benefits of IHI to task performance, we argue that IHI may be a general strategy for meeting increases in attentional demand. Other researchers, however, have suggested that the apparent benefits of IHI to attentional capacity are an epiphenomenon of the organization of the visual system (Fecteau and Enns in Neuropsychologia 43:1412–1428, 2005; Marsolek et al. in Neuropsychologia 40:1983–1999, 2002). In the current experiment, we investigate whether IHI increases attentional capacity outside the visual system by manipulating the selection demands of an auditory temporal pattern-matching task. We find that IHI expands attentional capacity in the auditory system. This suggests that the benefits of requiring IHI derive from a functional increase in attentional capacity rather than the organization of a specific sensory modality.


References
Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P (2005) Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual field. Psychol Sci 16:637–643
Banich MT (1998) The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn 36:128–157
Banich MT (2003) Interactions between the hemispheres and its implications for the processing capacity of the brain. In: Hugdahl K, Davidson RJ (eds) The asymmetrical brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 261–302
Banich MT, Belger A (1990) Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex 26(1):77–94
Banich MT, Brown WS (2002) A life-span perspective on interaction between the hemispheres. Dev Neuropsychol 18:1–10
Belger A, Banich MT (1992) Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia 30(10):923–929
Belger A, Banich MT (1998) Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. Neuropyschology 12(3):380–398
Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC (1998) Monaural asymmetries. In: Hugdahl K et al (eds) Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods and research. Wiley, Chichester, pp 45–69
Fecteau JH, Enns JT (2005) Visual letter matching: Hemispheric functioning or scanning biases. Neuropsychologia 43:1412–1428
Gordon HW, Bogen JE (1974) Hemispheric lateralization of singing after intracarotid sodium amylobarbitone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37:727–738
Levy J, Trevarthen C (1976) Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:299–312
Marsolek CJ, Nicholas CD, Andresen DR (2002) Interhemispheric communication of abstract and specific visual-form information. Neuropsychologia 40:1983–1999
Milner B, Taylor L, Sperry RW (1968) Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science 161(837):184–186
Passarotti AM, Banich MT, Sood RK, Wong JM (2002) A generalized role of interhemispheric interaction under attentionally demanding conditions: evidence from the auditory and tactile modalities. Neuropsychologia 40:1082–1096
Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ, Feindel WH (1999) The role of auditory cortex in retention of rhythmic patterns as studied in patients with temporal lobe removals including Heschl’s gyrus. Neuropsychologia 37:315–331
Peretz I (1990) Processing of local and global musical information by unilateral brain-damaged patients. Brain 113:1185–1205
Peretz I, Morais J (1980) Modes of processing melodee and ear asymmetries in non-musicians. Neuropsychologia 18:477–489
Robertson LC, Lamb MR (1991) Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cogn Psychol 23:299–330
Robin D, Tranel D, Damasio H (1990) Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions. Brain Lang 39:539–555
Scalf PE, Banich MT, Kramer AF, Narechania K, Simon CL (2007) Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:298–329
Weissman DH, Banich MT (1998) A role for interhemispheric interaction in reducing the effects of global-local interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 128(3):283–308
Woldorff MG, Tempelmann C, Fell J, Tegeler C, Gaschler-Markefski B, Hinrichs H, Heinz HJ, Scheich H (1999) Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 7:49–66
Zatorre RJ, Belin P (2001) Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cerebral Corex 11:946–953
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scalf, P.E., Banich, M.T. & Erickson, A.B. Interhemispheric interaction expands attentional capacity in an auditory selective attention task. Exp Brain Res 194, 317–322 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1739-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1739-z