Skip to main content
Log in

Interhemispheric interaction expands attentional capacity in an auditory selective attention task

Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous work from our laboratory indicates that interhemispheric interaction (IHI) functionally increases the attentional capacity available to support performance on visual tasks (Banich in The asymmetrical brain, pp 261–302, 2003). Because manipulations of both computational complexity and selection demand alter the benefits of IHI to task performance, we argue that IHI may be a general strategy for meeting increases in attentional demand. Other researchers, however, have suggested that the apparent benefits of IHI to attentional capacity are an epiphenomenon of the organization of the visual system (Fecteau and Enns in Neuropsychologia 43:1412–1428, 2005; Marsolek et al. in Neuropsychologia 40:1983–1999, 2002). In the current experiment, we investigate whether IHI increases attentional capacity outside the visual system by manipulating the selection demands of an auditory temporal pattern-matching task. We find that IHI expands attentional capacity in the auditory system. This suggests that the benefits of requiring IHI derive from a functional increase in attentional capacity rather than the organization of a specific sensory modality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P (2005) Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual field. Psychol Sci 16:637–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banich MT (1998) The missing link: the role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing. Brain Cogn 36:128–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banich MT (2003) Interactions between the hemispheres and its implications for the processing capacity of the brain. In: Hugdahl K, Davidson RJ (eds) The asymmetrical brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 261–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Banich MT, Belger A (1990) Interhemispheric interaction: how do the hemispheres divide and conquer a task? Cortex 26(1):77–94

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banich MT, Brown WS (2002) A life-span perspective on interaction between the hemispheres. Dev Neuropsychol 18:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belger A, Banich MT (1992) Interhemispheric interaction affected by computational complexity. Neuropsychologia 30(10):923–929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belger A, Banich MT (1998) Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. Neuropyschology 12(3):380–398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC (1998) Monaural asymmetries. In: Hugdahl K et al (eds) Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods and research. Wiley, Chichester, pp 45–69

  • Fecteau JH, Enns JT (2005) Visual letter matching: Hemispheric functioning or scanning biases. Neuropsychologia 43:1412–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon HW, Bogen JE (1974) Hemispheric lateralization of singing after intracarotid sodium amylobarbitone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37:727–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levy J, Trevarthen C (1976) Metacontrol of hemispheric function in human split-brain patients. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:299–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsolek CJ, Nicholas CD, Andresen DR (2002) Interhemispheric communication of abstract and specific visual-form information. Neuropsychologia 40:1983–1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner B, Taylor L, Sperry RW (1968) Lateralized suppression of dichotically presented digits after commissural section in man. Science 161(837):184–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Passarotti AM, Banich MT, Sood RK, Wong JM (2002) A generalized role of interhemispheric interaction under attentionally demanding conditions: evidence from the auditory and tactile modalities. Neuropsychologia 40:1082–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penhune VB, Zatorre RJ, Feindel WH (1999) The role of auditory cortex in retention of rhythmic patterns as studied in patients with temporal lobe removals including Heschl’s gyrus. Neuropsychologia 37:315–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz I (1990) Processing of local and global musical information by unilateral brain-damaged patients. Brain 113:1185–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz I, Morais J (1980) Modes of processing melodee and ear asymmetries in non-musicians. Neuropsychologia 18:477–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson LC, Lamb MR (1991) Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization. Cogn Psychol 23:299–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robin D, Tranel D, Damasio H (1990) Auditory perception of temporal and spectral events in patients with focal left and right cerebral lesions. Brain Lang 39:539–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scalf PE, Banich MT, Kramer AF, Narechania K, Simon CL (2007) Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33:298–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman DH, Banich MT (1998) A role for interhemispheric interaction in reducing the effects of global-local interference. J Exp Psychol Gen 128(3):283–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldorff MG, Tempelmann C, Fell J, Tegeler C, Gaschler-Markefski B, Hinrichs H, Heinz HJ, Scheich H (1999) Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp 7:49–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zatorre RJ, Belin P (2001) Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cerebral Corex 11:946–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paige E. Scalf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scalf, P.E., Banich, M.T. & Erickson, A.B. Interhemispheric interaction expands attentional capacity in an auditory selective attention task. Exp Brain Res 194, 317–322 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1739-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1739-z

Keywords

Navigation