Skip to main content
Log in

Haptic localizations for onset and offset of vibro-tactile stimuli are dissociated

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When humans explore the external world, hand and arm movements play important roles. Spatio-temporal arrangements of the environment are perceptually generated mainly by means of the sensory–motor integration of the internal model of these movements with the information obtained during the movements. In order to investigate the mechanisms of this integration process, localization tasks have been studied, and previous studies have suggested that the integration process does not work properly around the time of a hand movement. In particular, when a transient vibro-tactile stimulation is presented before, during, or after a hand movement, the stimulus is systematically mislocalized. However, it is debatable whether the tendency to mislocalize a transient stimulus indicates a general failure of the sensory-motor integration process. Here we investigated the generality of the tendency towards mislocalization by observing haptic localizations to different target types, the onset and offset of continuous vibro-tactile stimuli. We found similar types of mislocalizations in responses to the transient vibration and the onset of a continuous vibration, and a clear difference in the types of mislocalizations in responses to the onset and offset of continuous vibrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azuma R, Haggard P (1999) Effects of response type on coordinated responses during arm movement. Percept Psychophys 61:579–590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher L, Groh JM, Hughes HC (2001) Afferent delays and the mislocalization of perisaccadic stimuli. Vision Res 41:2631–2644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai RH, Pouget A, Schlag-Rey M, Schlag J (1997) Perceived geometrical relationships affected by eye-movement signals. Nature 386:601–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordo PJ (1990) Kinesthetic control of a multijoint movement sequence. J Neurophysiol 63:161–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cordo PJ, Carlton L, Bevan L, Carlton M, Kerr GK (1994) Proprioceptive coordination of movement sequences: role of velocity and position information. J Neurophysiol 71:1848–1861

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dassonville P (1995) Haptic localization and the internal representation of the hand in space. Exp Brain Res 106:434–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dyhre-Poulsen P (1975) Increased vibration threshold before movements in human subjects. Exp Neurol 47:516–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Lolley S (2001) The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 21:1361–1369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Georg K, Hamker FH, Lappe M (2008) Influence of adaptation state and stimulus luminance on peri-saccadic localization. J Vis 8(1):15.1–15.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard P, Newman CS, Blundell J, Andrew H (2000) The perceived position of the hand in space. Percept Psychophys 62:363–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horch KW, Clark FJ, Burgess PR (1975) Awareness of knee joint angle under static conditions. J Neurophysiol 38:1436–1447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskowski P (1996) Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: dissociations and hypotheses. Percept Mot Skills 82:707–730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jirsa R, Radil T, Maras L (1992) Perception of timing of movement onset in a simple reaction time task. Neuroreport 3:524–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G (1987) Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res 66:141–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson H, Van Beers RJ, Haggard P (2002) Action and awareness in pointing tasks. Exp Brain Res 146:451–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawato M, Furukawa K, Suzuki R (1987) A hierarchical neural network model for the control and learning of voluntary movements. Biol Cybern 56:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1999) Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2:1026–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey DI, Colebatch JG, Potter EK, Burke D (1983) Judgments about onset of rapid voluntary movements in man. J Neurophysiol 49:851–863

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milne RJ, Aniss AM, Kay NE, Gandevia SC (1988) Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study. Exp Brain Res 70:569–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhawan R, Kirschfeld K (2003) Analogous mechanisms compensate for neural delays in the sensory and the motor pathways: evidence from motor flash-lag. Curr Biol 13:749–753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida S, Johnston A (2002) Marker correspondence not processing latency determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Curr Biol 12:359–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paillard J, Brouchon M (1968) Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In: Freedman SJ (ed) Neurophysiolosy of spatinally oriented behavior. Dorsey, Homewood, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Post LJ, Zompa IC, Chapman CE (1994) Perception of vibrotactile stimuli during motor activity in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 100:107–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sittig AC, Denier van der Gon JJ, Gielen CCAM (1987) The contribution of afferent information on position and velocity demonstrated to the control of slow and fast human forearm movements. Exp Brain Res 67:33–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sperry RW (1950) Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43:482–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terao M, Watanabe J, Yagi A, Nishida S (2008) Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent time interval. Nat Neurosci 11:541–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P (2001) Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements. J Neurophysiol 85:1914–1922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Holst E (1954) Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. Br J Anim Behav 2:89–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe J, Noritake A, Maeda T, Tachi S, Nishida S (2005) Perisaccadic perception of continuous flickers. Vision Res 45:413–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junji Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watanabe, J., Nakatani, M., Ando, H. et al. Haptic localizations for onset and offset of vibro-tactile stimuli are dissociated. Exp Brain Res 193, 483–489 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1711-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1711-y

Keywords

Navigation